UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.  )



Filed by the Registrant [×]Filed by a Party other than Registrant  



Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

[×]Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

EVANS BANCORP, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)



Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[×]No fee required.

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.



(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:


(2)A group of hands putting their hands together

Description automatically generatedAggregate number2024 Notice of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)Per unit price or other underlying valueAnnual meeting of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculatedShareholders and state how it was determined):Proxy Statement

(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously.  Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)Amount Previously Paid:

(2)Form, Schedule, or Registration Statement No.:

(3)Filing Party:

(4)Date Filed:


 

A close-up of a message

Description automatically generated

Dear Valued Shareholders, Clients, Associates and Friends,

I am pleased to begin my report by recognizing the committed efforts of our team in again performing and delivering results against a backdrop of interest rate volatility and economic challenges which continued and accelerated throughout the year. Evans delivered historic net income performance of $24.2 million during 2023, though not in a typical manner. Margin pressures constrained operating income as a result of further extraordinary levels of Federal Reserve rate actions to combat inflation, which severely increased deposit costs and competition for deposits. Through this period, Evans successfully maintained its deposit relationships and liquidity position. Loan and asset yields however, did not rise as extensively as funding, which was where margin pressure emanated. Growth was also muted by higher rates, with stressed project economics and slack mortgage demand, despite some quality commercial lending growth. The Bank sought to address these pressures by carefully controlling costs and executing projects and investments aimed at driving operational efficiencies and scalability.

The major development for the year was the sale of The Evans Agency. For 23 years, The Evans Insurance Agency has been an integral part of Evans Bank, through the acquisition of over 15 insurance agencies and the delivery of strong non-interest income to supplement our earnings. This year, after extensive diligence, the Bank executed the strategic sale of the Agency to Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG), an American based global insurance brokerage and risk management services firm, for $40 million or almost 20 years of earnings. While not repeatable operating income, this transaction resulted in significant value creation, including tangible book value growth of $4.59 per share, an after-tax gain of $13.5 million, and the elimination of $12 million of goodwill and other intangibles. The sale created a significant return of capital and provides strategic flexibility to redeploy back into our core banking franchise to create further value.

In addition to the financial benefits of the Evans Agency sale, there were no job eliminations - all insurance team members were offered positions and continue working with existing colleagues and leadership. The acquisition of the Agency provides staff with significant opportunities to grow in their careers and flourish with expanded offerings of insurance, risk management and benefits services in an insurance-only platform with substantial resources, focus, and an unrivaled toolkit.  For clients and the community, we chose a partner that is values based, cares deeply about culture and clients, and provides a greater breadth of insurance expertise in many specialty areas.  Additionally, clients are experiencing continuity, as our former insurance associates and leadership continue to work on their behalf.  This includes a relationship to service the Bank as our insurance broker and a continuing referral relationship between Evans Bank and our colleagues joining AJG.

Evans Bank’s performance in 2023 was characterized by resiliency. Growth, while difficult to come by, was attained through commercial business and lending activity. A restructuring of the balance sheet to reduce lower yielding assets was one of the strategic opportunities afforded with the capital generated by the Insurance Agency sale, allowing us to pay down borrowings with proceeds, which is anticipated to improve returns in 2024 and into the future. All these actions were taken to deliver results in a challenging environment.



O:\Finance Share\Finance\Proxy\2012\HTML Files\proxy_files\72c7d75686af498g1.jpgWe continue to be focused on shareholder returnMarch 22, 2018, with an increase in dividends of approximately 5% to $1.32/share. 

It is expected that headwinds for community and regional financial institutions will persist for some time, putting pressure on margins and funding until interest rates recede with evidence of a Federal Reserve easing cycle to support slowing economic activity.





To Our Shareholders:



On behalf of the Board of Directors, I cordially invite you to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Evans Bancorp, Inc.  The Annual Meeting this year will be held at Evans Bancorp, Inc.,  One Grimsby Drive, Hamburg, NY 14075, onThursday, April 26,  2018 at 9:00 a.m.  The formal Notice of the Annual Meeting is set forth on the following page.

The enclosed Notice and Proxy Statement contain details concerning the business to come before the 2018 Annual Meeting.  The Board of Directors of Evans Bancorp recommends a vote “FOR” the election of Robert G. Miller, Jr., Kimberley A. Minkel, Christina P. Orsi, Michael J. Rogers, and Oliver H. Sommer for a three year term. The Board of Directors of Evans Bancorp also recommends a vote “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, and “FOR” ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as Evans Bancorp’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2018.

To Vote:

Your vote is important, regardless of whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting in person.  I urge you to sign, date, and return the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided as promptly as possible. In this way, you can be sure that your shares will be voted at the meeting.  If you are voting “FOR” the election of the nominated directors, “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, and “FOR” ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as Evans Bancorp, Inc.’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2018, you need only date, sign and return the proxy card.

Voting is tabulated by an independent firm; therefore, to ensure that your vote is received in a timely manner, please mail the white proxy card in the envelope provided - do not return the proxy card to Evans Bancorp, Inc.

To Attend the Annual Meeting:

To ensure that our reservation count will be accurate, if you plan to attend the meeting, please complete the appropriate section on the white proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided - do not return the proxy card to Evans Bancorp, Inc.

PLEASE NOTE THAT, DUE TO LIMITED SEATING, WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE GUESTS OF OUR SHAREHOLDERS AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, AND MUST LIMIT ATTENDANCE TO SHAREHOLDERS ONLY.

Thank you for your confidence and support.

Sincerely,

O:\Finance Share\Finance\Proxy\2012\HTML Files\proxy_files\72c7d75686af498g2.jpg

David J. Nasca

President and Chief Executive Officer




 

A group of orange rectangular objects

Description automatically generated

Other Highlights

A newly formed Growth team, including Commercial, Retail and Consumer Banking, and Marketing, began to realize the benefits of their new alignment in 2023. The Commercial Team produced 4.1% growth in the commercial portfolio and welcomed a 30-year Rochester Commercial Banking veteran as new Regional Director, responsible for building and leading the Commercial and Industrial (C&I) team to further establish the Bank in the Rochester market.  The Wealth Management program grew net new assets and increased Assets Under Management by 9% over 2022.   A new “Orange” consumer product suite featuring two savings accounts and three checking accounts, including a BankOn certified no-fee checking account, was launched and created strong customer acquisition. 

Evans made significant strides in technology and operational effectiveness this year, with upgrades and enhancements to both systems and client experience.  The adoption of Glia and Illuma technology allows the Customer Experience Center to communicate with clients more efficiently via a variety of channels. Digital banking enhancement remains a priority and planning continues for future implementation, and progress on the commercial efficiency project resulted in more effective loan workflows and streamlined processing.

Evans was once again certified as a Great Place to Work by its associates, based on feedback they provided in the annual associate survey. Leadership continued to balance business needs and changing workforce dynamics by instituting a renewed hybrid model combining onsite collaboration and remote work.  In a benchmark culture survey, 83% of associates stated they experience others exhibiting our Core Values (focus on customers, live your passion, showcase your talent, take ownership, value others, and do the right thing) on a consistent basis, and experience our culture norms (belonging, agility, purpose, collaboration, influence, impact and accountability) on a frequent basis.

We reinforced our deep commitment to Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Awareness (IDEA) with an emphasis on our Inclusive Strategic Plan to better empower Evans associates to further our culture and recruit and promote associates with diverse backgrounds. We adopted an Employee Resource Group structure and established a Culture Ambassador program to further inclusion and belonging at Evans, and enhanced alignment of the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Advisory Council. Externally, we are continuing to build communication that reflects our IDEA focus and activities.

On the philanthropic front, Evans Bank’s signature community partnership, Work/Life Solutions, was recognized nationally for its effectiveness during FINRA’s National “Financial Wellness at Work” Conference held in Buffalo. The program, which was expanded for employees of nonprofit organizations serving East Buffalo, continues to positively impact the lives of those in participating organizations by increasing their financial standing and access to services. 

Evans associates continued to serve the community through volunteerismin 2023. Our Financial Fitness team, which is comprised of dozens of associates from across lines of business and support functions, facilitated 76 workshops for over 1,700 participants on varying topics, including Fraud Prevention, Savings Options, Budgeting and Insurance for Business.  Over 50 of the workshops were conducted in low- or moderate-income neighborhoods in Buffalo and Rochester. 

As we begin 2024, we are passionately committed to driving value for all our stakeholders and addressing head-on the economic headwinds that continue to impact the Financial Services Industry. We greatly value and appreciate your trust and confidence in Evans to deliver on this commitment.

A close-up of a signature

Description automatically generated


 











 

Picture 4

This page intentionally left blank


EVANS BANCORP, INC.

One Grimsby Drive

Hamburg, NY 14075

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

April 26, 2018

The ThirtiethNotice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders 

Date

May7, 2024

Time

9:00 a.m. EST

Location

Virtual Meeting: meetnow.global/MFSSWY9

Record Date

March 11, 2024

Items of Business

(1)To elect the four nominees named in the Proxy Statement as directors of the Company, each for a three-year term and until his or her successor is elected and qualified.

(2)To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers.

(3)To ratify the appointment of Crowe LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024.

(4)To act upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Evans Bancorp, Inc., a New York corporation (the "Company"), will be held on Thursday, April 26,  2018 at 9:00 a.m. at Evans Bancorp, Inc.,  One Grimsby Drive, Hamburg, NY,Proxy Materials for the following purposes:

(1)To elect the five nominees named in the Proxy Statement as directors of the Company for a three-year term,  each until the election and qualification of his or her successor.

(2)To approve,Shareholder Meeting to be Held on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers.

(3)To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2018.

(4)To act upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON APRIL 26, 2018

The Company’s Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Report, which includes the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, are available on the Company’s website at www.evansbancorp.com.

May 7, 2024 

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 5, 201811, 2024 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

You may access the Annual Meeting by visiting meetnow.global/MFSSWY9.   By attending the meeting virtually, you will be able to participate in the Annual Meeting, including voting and asking questions.

A copyIf you are a registered shareholder (i.e., you hold your shares through our transfer agent, Computershare), you do not need to register to attend the Annual Meeting virtually on the Internet. Registered shareholders can attend and vote at the Annual Meeting by logging in with their voter control number. The control number can be found on the proxy card, notice, or email you previously received.

Shareholders who hold their shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, must register in advance to vote and/or ask questions at the Annual Meeting. To register, shareholders must submit proof of their proxy power (legal proxy) reflecting their Evans Bancorp, Inc. holdings along with their name and email address to Computershare at legalproxy@computershare.com. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 22, 2024. Shareholders will receive a confirmation email with a control number from Computershare regarding their registration. 

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting virtually, you are encouraged to vote in advance of the Company's Annual ReportMeeting. Registered shareholders can vote shares online, by telephone or by regular mail in advance of the Annual Meeting. To access your proxy materials and vote online, please visit www.envisionreports.com/EVBN and follow the instructions. If you wish to vote by telephone, please call 1-800-652-8683 using a touch-tone phone and follow the prompted instructions. You may also vote by mail by requesting a paper proxy card. Shareholders and Annual Report on Form 10-K forwho hold their shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, should follow voting instructions provided by the Company’s 2017 fiscal year are enclosed for your reference.intermediary. 

Please complete and return the enclosed proxy card in the accompanying postage-paid, addressed envelope as soon as you have had an opportunity to review the attached Proxy Statement.

By Order of the Board of Directors

A close-up of a signature

Description automatically generated 

Picture 11

Robert G. Miller, Jr.

Secretary



Hamburg,

Michelle A. Baumgarden

Secretary

Williamsville, New York

March 22, 201825, 2024






 

EVANS BANCORP, INC.

One Grimsby Drive

Hamburg, NY 14075

PROXY STATEMENT

Dated March 22, 2018

For the Annual MeetingTable of Shareholders to be held April 26, 2018

GENERAL INFORMATION

This Proxy Statement is furnished to the shareholders of Evans Bancorp, Inc., a New York corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the solicitation of proxies for use at the Thirtieth Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "Annual Meeting") to be held at Evans Bancorp, Inc.,  One Grimsby Drive, Hamburg, NY, on Thursday, April 26, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. and at any adjournments thereof.  To obtain directions to be able to attend our Annual Meeting and vote in person, please contact Michelle Baumgarden at (716) 926-2000.

Shares of common stock represented by a proxy in the form enclosed, properly executed, will be voted in the manner instructed, or if no instructions are indicated, “FOR” the election of director nominees named therein, “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, and “FOR” ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2018.  The proxy given by the enclosed proxy card may be revoked at any time before it is voted by delivering to the Secretary of the Company a written revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.  Any shareholder of record may vote in person at the Annual Meeting, whether or not he or she has previously given a proxy.  Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not have the effect of revoking a proxy unless you give proper written notice of revocation to the Secretary before the proxy is exercised or you vote by written ballot at the meeting.    If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and you wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy from the organization that holds your shares.

The enclosed proxy is being solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company.  The total cost of solicitation of proxies in connection with the Annual Meeting will be borne by the Company.

This Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy are first being mailed to shareholders on or about March 22, 2018.

The following proposals will be considered at the meeting:

Proposal I – To elect the  five nominees named herein as directors of the Company to hold office for the term of three years. 

Proposal II – To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers (“Say on Pay”).

Proposal III – To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2018.

The Board of Directors of the Company unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” election of the directors identified as nominees under Proposal I and “FOR” Proposals II and III.

1


Voting Securities

Only holders of shares of common stock of record at the close of business on March 5, 2018 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and at all adjournments thereof.  At the close of business on March 5, 2018, the Company had 4,787,550 shares of common stock outstanding.  For all matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share.

A quorum of shareholders is necessary to hold a valid Annual Meeting.  A majority of shares entitled to vote, present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting.  Broker non-votes and abstentions will be counted as being present or represented at the Annual Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum.  A broker non-vote occurs on an item when a broker is not permitted to vote on that item without timely instruction from the beneficial owner of the shares and no instruction is given.

Vote Required and Board RecommendationsContents



 

Proxy Summary

 

  

 

  i

General Information

Voting Securities

  

 

 

  

 

Voting Required and Board Recommendations

  

 

 

  

Plurality Vote—Proposal I

  

Vote Required

 

Board Recommendation

  

 

Majority Vote—Proposals II and III

  

 

I.

Election of Directors

 

Plurality of the votes cast

“FOR” election of the nominated directors

  

 

II.

Advisory “Say-on-Pay” Vote

Majority of the votes cast

“FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation paid to our named executive officers

III.

Ratification of Appointment of Independent Public Accounting Firm for 2018

Majority of the votes cast

“FOR” ratification of the appointment of KMPG LLP

Plurality Vote – Proposal I

Under New York law and the Company's bylaws, directors are elected by the affirmative vote, in person or by proxy, of a plurality of the votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum is present.  Only votes actually cast will be counted for the purpose of determining whether a particular nominee received more votes than the persons, if any, nominated for the same seat on the Board of Directors.  This means that, for Proposal I, the five director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement will be elected if they receive more affirmative votes than any other nominees.  If, as the Company anticipates, the five director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement are unopposed, they each only need to receive a single vote to be elected.  In this instance, withholding authority to vote for a particular candidate will have no effect on the results of Proposal I.

Majority Vote – Proposals II and III

The approval of the Say on Pay advisory vote (Proposal II) and the ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal III) require for adoption the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote on the proposal at the Annual Meeting.

2


Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes

 

Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting.  However, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be treated as votes “cast” at the Annual Meeting, and will have no effect on the outcome of any of the proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting.

If you hold your shares (i.e., they are registered) through a bank, broker or other nominee in “street name” but you do not provide the firm that holds your shares with your specific voting instructions, it will only be allowed to vote your shares on your behalf in its discretion on “routine” matters, but it cannot vote your shares in its discretion on your behalf on any “non-routine” matters.  This result is known as a “broker non-vote”.  Proposal I relating to the election of your Board’s nominees for Directors and Proposal II relating to Say on Pay are considered “non-routine” matters.  Proposal III relating to the appointment of the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2018 is considered a “routine” matter.  While your broker will have discretionary authority to vote your uninstructed shares “for” or “against” or “abstaining” from voting on Proposal III, your broker will have no discretionary authority to vote your shares on Proposals I and II at the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares in street name, please follow the voting instructions sent to you by your bank, broker or other nominee.

Security Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial
Owners

  

The following table sets forth information, as

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Proposal I—Election of March 5, 2018, concerning:Directors

Required Vote

 

Information Regarding Directors, Director Nominees and
Each person whom we know beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock.

Each of our directors and nominees for the Board of Directors.

Each of our Named Executive Officers as defined below under “Executive Compensation”.

All of our directors and executive officers as a group.

  

Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to our securities.  Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned.  The number of shares beneficially owned by each person as of March 5, 2018 includes shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire on or within 60 days after March  5, 2018 upon the exercise of vested stock options and also includes shares of restricted stock that are subject to forfeiture and transfer restrictions until the vesting date thereof.  For each person or group included in the table below, percentage ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person, calculated as described in the previous sentence, by the sum of the 4,787,550 shares of common stock outstanding on March 5, 2018 plus the number of shares of common stock that such person or group has the right to acquire on or within 60 days after March 5, 2018. Beneficial ownership representing less than one percent is denoted with an "*".

 

3

10 

 


Name of Beneficial Owner

Number of Shares Beneficially Owned

 

Percent of Class



 

 

 

Directors, Director Nominees and Officers 

 

 

 

Michael A. Battle

1,048 

 

*

James E. Biddle, Jr. 

20,979 

 

*

John B. Connerton (1)

24,055 

 

0.50%

Jody L. Lomeo

1,074 

 

*

Robert G. Miller, Jr. (2)

104,602 

 

2.17%

Kimberley A. Minkel

-

 

*

David J. Nasca (3)

119,399 

 

2.46%

John R. O’Brien†

11,630 

 

*

Christina P. Orsi

-

 

*

David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr.

2,136 

 

*

Michael J. Rogers

4,591 

 

*

Oliver Sommer

924 

 

*

Nora B. Sullivan

2,603 

 

*

Thomas H. Waring, Jr. (4)

12,505 

 

*

Lee C. Wortham

10,334 

 

*

Directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group; 15 persons (5)

315,880 

 

6.43%



 

 

 

 Mr. O’Brien announced his resignation as a director effective March 31, 2018.



 

5% Security Holders

 

 

 

 

RMB Capital Management, LLC (6)
115 S. LaSalle Street, 34th Floor
Chicago, IL 60603

441,862 

 

9.23%

Manulife Financial Corporation (7)

200 Bloor Street East

Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4W 1E5

333,519 

 

6.97%

FJ Capital Management LLC (8)

1313 Dolley Madison Blvd., Suite 306

McLean, VA 22101

254,208 

 

5.31%

Maltese Capital Management LLC (9)

150 East 52nd Street, 30th Floor

New York, NY 10022

 

240,000 

 

5.01%

  

 

(1)

Includes 18,578 shares that Mr. Connerton may acquire by exercise of options exercisable on March 5, 2018 or within 60 days thereafter and 2,111 shares of restricted stock that are subject to forfeiture and transfer restrictions until the vesting date thereof.

4


(2)

Includes 37,008 shares that Mr. Miller may acquire by exercise of options exercisable on March 5, 2018 or within 60 days thereafter and 3,466 shares of restricted stock that are subject to forfeiture and transfer restrictions until the vesting date thereof.

(3)

Includes 2,149 shares owned jointly by Mr. Nasca and his wife, 552 shares owned by Mr. Nasca’s children, 69,528 shares that Mr. Nasca may acquire by exercise of options exercisable on March 5, 2018 or within 60 days thereafter and 6,293 shares of restricted stock that are subject to forfeiture and transfer restrictions until the vesting date thereof.

(4)

Includes 1,076  shares held by Mr. Waring’s wife. 

(5)

Includes 125,114 shares that such persons may acquire by exercise of options exercisable on March 5, 2018 or within 60 days thereafter.

(6)

Based on the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2018 by RMB Capital Holdings, LLC (reporting shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 441,862 shares), RMB Capital Management, LLC (reporting shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 441,862 shares), Iron Road Capital Partners LLC. (reporting shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 12,821 shares), RMB Mendon Managers, LLC (reporting shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 338,397 shares) and Mendon Capital Advisors Corp. (reporting shared voting and shared dispositive power with respect to 90,644 shares).

(7)

Based on the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2018 on behalf of Manulife Financial Corporation (“MFC”) and MFC’s indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries, Manulife Asset Management (US) LLC (“MAM (US)”), Manulife Asset Management (North America) Limited ("MAM (NA)"), and Manulife Asset Management Limited ("MAML").  MAM (US) reported sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 332,511 shares. MAM (NA) reported sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 28 shares. MAML reported sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 980 shares.

(8)

Based on the most recently available Form 13G filed with the SEC on February 23, 2018 by Financial Opportunity Fund LLC of which FJ Capital Management LLC is the managing member (reported shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 254,208 shares) and Martin S. Friedman, the managing member of FJ Capital Management LLC (reported shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 254,208 shares).

(9)

Based on the most recently available Form 13D/A filed with the SEC on March 8, 2017 by Maltese Capital Management LLC (“Maltese”) (reporting shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 240,000 shares) and Terry Maltese (managing member of Maltese) (reporting shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 240,000 shares).

5


Equity Compensation Plans.  All equity compensation plans maintained by the company were approved by the Company’s shareholders.  Shown below is certain information as of December 31, 2017 concerning the shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under existing equity compensation plans.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders

 

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options

 

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options

 

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (1)

Evans Bancorp, Inc. 2009 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan

 

 

228,320 

 

$

20.81 

 

107,824 

Evans Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Option and Long-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Term Incentive Plan

 

 

12,900 

 

 

15.52 

 

-    

Evans Bancorp, Inc 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

 

-    

 

 

-    

 

114,944 

Total

 

 

241,220 

 

$

20.53 

 

222,768 

(1) This column excludes shares reflected under the column “Number of Securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options.”

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) requires the Company's officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Company's common stock, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC.  Officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company and written representations from the Company's officers and directors, the Company believes that during or with respect to fiscal year 2017, all reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act were timely filed.

PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Company's bylaws provide for a classified board of directors, with three classes of directors, each nearly as equal in number as possible.  Each class serves for a three-year term, and one class is elected each year.  The Board of Directors is authorized by the Company's bylaws to fix from time to time, the number of directors that constitute the whole Board of Directors.  The Board size has been set at thirteen members.  The nominees for director at the 2018 Annual Meeting are: Robert G. Miller, Jr. Kimberley A. Minkel, Christina P. Orsi, Michael J. Rogers, and Oliver H. Sommer, for terms to expire at the 2021 Annual Meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any nominee would be unable or unwilling to serve, if elected. In the event that any nominee for director becomes unavailable and a vacancy exists, it is intended that the Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors will recommend a substitute nominee for approval by the Board of Directors.

Required Vote

Under New York law and the Company’s bylaws, directors are elected by the affirmative vote, in person or by proxy, of a plurality of the votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum is present.  Only votes actually

6


cast will be counted for the purpose of determining whether a particular nominee received more votes than the persons, if any, nominated for the same seat on the Board of Directors.  This means that, for Proposal I, the five director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement will be elected if they receive more affirmative votes than any other nominees.  Votes to withhold in an uncontested election and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this vote.

Unless otherwise directed, the persons named in the proxy card intend to vote shares as to which proxies are received “FOR” the director nominees: Robert G. Miller, Jr. Kimberley A. Minkel, Christina P. Orsi, Michael J. Rogers, and Oliver H. Sommer .

THE COMPANY’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

INFORMATION REGARDING DIRECTORS, DIRECTOR NOMINEES

AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following tables set forth the names, ages, and positions of the director nominees, the directors continuing in office, and the executive officers of the Company:

Nominees for Director:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Age

 

Position

 

Term to Expire

 

Independent*

Robert G. Miller, Jr. †

 

61

 

Director

 

2021

 

No



 

 

 

Secretary of the Company

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

President of The Evans Agency, LLC

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Executive Vice President of Evans Bank, N.A.

 

 

 

 

Kimberley Minkel

 

52

 

Director

 

2021

 

Yes

Christina Orsi

 

46

 

Director

 

2021

 

Yes

Michael J. Rogers

 

60

 

Director

 

2021

 

Yes

Oliver H. Sommer

 

50

 

Director

 

2021

 

Yes

† Executive Officer

* Independence has been determined by the Company’s Board of Directors as defined in the listing rules of NYSE American.

Directors Continuing in Office and Executive Officers:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Age

 

Position

 

Term Expires

 

Independent*

Michael A. Battle

 

62

 

Director

 

2020

 

Yes

James E. Biddle, Jr.

 

56

 

Director

 

2020

 

Yes

Jody L. Lomeo

 

49

 

Director

 

2020

 

Yes

David J. Nasca †

 

60

 

Director

 

2019

 

No



 

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer of the

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Company

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer of

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Evans Bank, N.A.

 

 

 

 

David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr.

 

48

 

Director

 

2019

 

Yes

Nora B. Sullivan

 

60

 

Director

 

2020

 

Yes

Thomas H. Waring, Jr.

 

60

 

Director

 

2019

 

Yes

Lee C. Wortham

 

60

 

Director

 

2019

 

Yes

John B. Connerton †

 

51

 

Treasurer of the Company

 

---

 

---



 

 

 

Chief Financial Officer of Evans Bank, N.A.

 

 

 

 

† Executive Officer

*  Independence has been determined by the Company’s Board of Directors as defined in the listing rules of NYSE American.

7


Directors, Director Nominees and Executive Officer Information.

Set forth below are the biographies of (1) each of the nominees and continuing directors containing information regarding the person’s service as a director, business experience, director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Board to determine that the person should serve as a director for the Company, and (2) the executive officers of the Company.

Nominees for Director

  

Mr. Miller has been a director of the Company since 2001 and has served as the Secretary of the Company since April 2010.  He has served as the President of The Evans Agency, LLC (“TEA”), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, since 2000 and as Executive Vice President of Evans Bank, N.A. (the  “Bank”) since December 2009.  He also has served as the President of Evans National Financial Services, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, since May 2002.  Mr. Miller’s substantial experience in the financial services industry gives him a solid foundation from which to advise the Board with respect to financial service acquisition opportunities, and his experience overseeing a financial sales force provides him with a practical background on matters such as developing strategies to succeed in a highly competitive marketplace.

 

Ms. Minkel has been President and Executive Director of the Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority (“NFTA”) since 2010.  Ms. Minkel is responsible for managing a transportation system including light rail, bus, paratransit, and two airports within Western New York.  Ms. Minkel manages an annual $225 million operating and capital budget that provides efficient and professional transportation services while engaging with board members, over 1,500 employees, stakeholders, and the general public in a manner consistent with the needs of a diverse community.  Before her role as President and Executive Director of the NFTA, Ms. Minkel served as Director of Risk, Health, Safety, and Environmental Quality for the NFTA.  In this role, she provided functional leadership within the areas of risk management including loss control, environmental, and safety.  We believe Ms. Minkel’s extensive executive experience and community leadership qualify her to serve on our Board of Directors.

12 

 

Ms. Orsi has been Associate Vice President of the Office of Economic Development for the University at Buffalo (“UB”) since 2015.  In this role, Ms. Orsi leads UB’s Business and Entrepreneur Partnership with a focus on connecting business with UB faculty for collaboration on research and development; enabling business access to programs like START UP NY to help companies grow in New York State; and supporting the commercialization of faculty inventions to move the from idea to market.  From 2007-2015, Ms. Orsi was the Executive Director of the Regional Economic Development Council and Regional Director for Western New York for the Empire State Development Corporation.  In this role, Ms. Orsi provided strategic direction for the Regional Economic Development Council, established collaboration among diverse leaders throughout Buffalo Niagara, and led implementation of the Buffalo Billion Investment Strategy.  We believe that Ms. Orsi’s extensive knowledge of economic development programs, private sector policy issues, and government agencies at the state, regional, and municipal levels qualify her to serve on our Board of Directors.

  

Mr. Rogers has been a director of the Company since 2011.  He is a certified public accountant in New York State and the managing member of a real estate development company, Oakgrove Development, LLC, a position he has held since 2009.  Mr. Rogers was the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Great Lakes Bancorp, Inc., the parent company of Greater Buffalo Savings Bank, from 2006 to 2008.  From 2004 to 2006, Mr. Rogers worked as an independent consultant, principally on Sarbanes-Oxley initiatives and business rationalization reviews.  Mr. Rogers worked at KPMG LLP, a leading accounting firm, from 1984 to 2004, serving as an audit partner from 1995 to 2004.  In his role as an auditor at KPMG LLP, Mr. Rogers worked on several engagements for financial institutions, particularly banks.  His many years of experience have provided Mr. Rogers with a very strong knowledge base on the banking industry.  His previous roles as an audit partner, SEC reviewing partner, and CFO also demonstrate his high level of

8


competence in the areas of finance and accounting in general, and SEC reporting in particular, qualify him to be our Audit Committee Chairman and a member of the Board’s Enterprise Risk Committee, and provide the Board an additional expert on these matters in an increasingly complex regulatory environment.

Mr. Sommerhas been a director of the Company since April 2017.  He has been a partner with The River Group, a management consulting firm assisting CEOs and senior executive transform their organizations and leaders in order to achieve strategic intent, since July 2013.  His role includes leading the marketing, business development, practice development, client engagement management, infrastructure establishment, and recruiting efforts.  Prior to his role with The River Group, Mr. Sommer was Executive Vice President, Corporate Development, with First Niagara Financial Group, Inc. (now part of KeyCorp.) from 2010 – 2013, providing financial services to individuals, families and businesses across Upstate New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut and Massachusetts.  Mr. Sommer was the President of Aston Associates / Aston Strategic Capital, a boutique advisory firm for financial institutions and their investors, from 2004 – 2010, and Managing Director from 1996 – 2003.  We believe Mr. Sommer’s extensive experience in the financial services industry in a variety of roles, but in particular in corporate strategy and development, make him well-qualified to serve on our Board of Directors and its Enterprise Risk Committee. 

 

Directors Continuing in Office and Executive Officers

  

Mr. Battlehas been a director of the Company since August 2016.  He has been a partner of the Washington, DC office of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, specializing in white collar criminal defense, as a member of the firm’s Litigation Department since April 2016.  Mr. Battle’s practice focuses on commercial and civil litigation, white collar criminal matters, and appeals.  Prior to his role with Barnes & Thornburg, Mr. Battle was a senior partner of Schlam, Stone & Dolan LLP from 2010 – April 2016 and was a partner of Fulbright & Jaworski LLP from 2007 – 2010.  He was Director of the Executive Office for United States Attorneys from 2005 – 2007, providing administrative oversight of all 93 United States Attorneys and serving as a liaison between the United States Attorneys and the Justice Department and other federal agencies.  Mr. Battle served as United States Attorney with the United States Attorney’s Office, Western District of New York, from 2002 – 2005.  From 1996 – 2002, he was appointed by Governor George Pataki (and subsequently elected) to serve as Judge for Erie County Family Court, providing rulings in thousands of family-law and matrimonial cases.  Mr. Battle served as Attorney in Charge with the New York State Attorney’s Office, Buffalo Regional Office, from 1995 – 1996.  He was the Assistant Federal Defender with the Federal Defender’s Office, Western New York, from 1992 – 1995 and Assistant United States Attorney with the United States Attorney’s Office, Western District of New York, from 1985 – 1992.  Mr. Battle began his career as an Attorney with the Legal Aid Society of New York, Civil Division, from 1981 – 1985.  We believe that Mr. Battle’s wide-ranging and extensive legal and governance experience make him a valuable member of our Board and its

15 

  Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

  

Mr. Biddle has been a director of the Company since 2001.  He has served as the Chairman and Treasurer of Mader Construction Co., Inc., since 2001.  Mr. Biddle also has served as the Chief Financial Officer of Bullis Investors, LLC, since 2007.  In addition, Mr. Biddle has served as the Vice President and Treasurer of Arric Corp., an environmental remediation company.  Mr. Biddle has extensive experience in the construction sector, an attribute that enables him to assist the Board in understanding the opportunities and risks of a large component of our loan portfolio.  In addition, his experience as a treasurer provides the Board with skills in assessing risk and exercising diligence, which are functions relevant to his service on the Board’s Enterprise Risk Committee.  We believe that Mr. Biddle’s work in the construction industry, his continuing executive experience, and his proven financial acumen make him a very valuable member of our Board and its Human Resources and Compensation Committee and Enterprise Risk Committee.

Mr.  Lomeo has been a director of the Company since April 2017.  He has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Kaleida Health, a healthcare provider in Western New York, since April of 2014 and served as interim CEO from January 2014 - February 2014.  In addition to Kaleida Health, since 2014 he has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Great Lakes Health System of Western New York, the parent organization responsible for integrating the clinical activities of Kaleida Health, Erie

9


County Medical Center Corporation (ECMC), University at Buffalo and the Center for Hospice & Palliative Care.  Mr. Lomeo served as CEO of ECMC from 2009 - 2014.  We believe Mr. Lomeo’s significant executive experience and community leadership qualify him to serve as an integral member of our Board of Directors and its Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

Mr. Nasca has been a director of the Company since 2006.  Mr. Nasca also serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank.  He has held the position of President of the Company and the Bank since 2006, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank since 2007.  Mr. Nasca served as Chief Operating Officer of LifeStage, LLC, a health care services startup company, from October 2005 to August 2006.  From June 2004 to July 2005, Mr. Nasca served as Executive Vice President of Strategic Initiatives of First Niagara Financial Group.  Mr. Nasca held the position of Executive Vice President, Consumer Banking Group, Central New York Regional Executive of First Niagara Financial Group from June 2002 through June 2004.  From October 2000 to June 2002, Mr. Nasca served as President and CEO of Iroquois Financial, Inc. and Cayuga Bank which were wholly owned by First Niagara Financial Group.  Mr. Nasca serves as President and CEO of the Company and the Bank pursuant to an employment agreement with the Company and the Bank.  As President and CEO, Mr. Nasca provides our Board with information gained from hands-on management of our operations, identifying our near-term and long-term challenges and opportunities.  The Board has determined that Mr. Nasca’s significant experience in the banking industry over the past 30 years, including operational, financial, and executive roles, as well as his unique perspective as leader of our management team, qualifies him for service as a member of our Board of Directors.

Mr. Pfalzgrafhas been a director of the Company since 2014.  He has been a Managing Partner of Rupp, Baase, Pfalzgraf, Cunningham LLC, a law firm specializing in private business enterprises ranging from closely-held family businesses to multi-national corporations, since April 2000.  Mr. Pfalzgraf leads the firm’s corporate practice group, working primarily with private business enterprises ranging from closely-held family businesses to multi-national corporations.  He assists clients with all corporate needs including business formations, restructurings, mergers and acquisitions, financing and investment, development, labor and employment issues, and commercial transactions.  Mr. Pfalzgraf’s extensive legal and business experience makes him a valuable member of our Board of Directors as well as its Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and Human Resource and Compensation Committee.

Ms. Sullivan has been a director since 2013.  She is President of Sullivan Capital Partners, LLC, a financial services company providing investment banking and consulting services to closely-held private businesses.  Ms. Sullivan focuses on strategic planning, mergers and acquisitions, and governance matters.  Prior to founding Sullivan Capital Partners in 2004, Ms. Sullivan worked for Citigroup Private Bank from 2000 to 2004, providing wealth management and private equity services to high net worth clients.  From 1995 to 1999, Ms. Sullivan was Executive Vice President of Rand Capital Corporation, a publicly traded closed-end investment management company providing capital and managerial expertise to small and mid-size businesses.  Ms. Sullivan began her career in the legal profession where she held various positions with significant legal responsibility and acquired a solid foundation in corporate related matters and business transactions. In 2015, Ms. Sullivan joined the board of directors of 22nd Century Group, Inc. a publicly traded company that is in the plant biotechnology industry and is a leader in tobacco harm reduction. She is currently and has been a member of the board of directors of several privately held businesses, working closely with fellow board members, management and ownership on strategic planning initiatives, developing exit strategies and implementing sound governance practices.  We believe Ms. Sullivan’s unique combination of legal experience and financial services expertise qualifies her to serve on our Board of Directors, and as a member of the Board’s Audit Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

Mr. Waring has been a director of the Company since 1998.  He has owned and managed Waring Financial Group, a financial planning, insurance and financial services and sales firm since 1996.  Waring Financial Group was renamed GCW Risk and Benefit Solutions LLC in 2016.  Mr. Waring is the majority member of GCW Capital Group, LLC. Additionally, Mr. Waring is the majority member of GCW Capital, LLC, a

10


fee only independent registered investment advisory entity formed in August 2014 and registered with the SEC.  GCW Capital, LLC and GCW Risk and Benefit Solutions, LLC market themselves to the public under the brand GCW Capital Group, LLC.  He has also been the managing member of Family & Business Directions, LLC, a fee-based consulting business serving family-held and closely-held business owners, their families, and key executives, since 2010.  In 2015, Mr. Waring became a member of Mallard Advisory Group, LLC.  The firm consists of principals with diverse backgrounds and expertise in serving businesses facing ownership and other major transitions. Mr. Waring’s financial services experience provides the Board with a deeper understanding of the products and services which the Company needs to provide in the marketplace to remain competitive, as well as the delivery of those products and services. He has also been the managing member of Family & Business Directions, LLC, a fee-based consulting business serving family-held and closely-held business owners, their families, and key executives, since 2010.  Mr. Waring frequently advises high net worth individuals, family business owners and closely-held business owners.  He is experienced in providing strategic planning and development advice, including designing and implementing executive and key employee benefits.  We believe that Mr. Waring’s qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors, as Chairman of the Human Resource and Compensation Committee and as a member of the Board’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee include his extensive sales and marketing experience with a financial services company, as well as his executive leadership and management experience. 

Mr. Wortham has been a director of the Company since 2011 and has served as Vice Chairman since April 2012.  He has been a Partner in Barrantys LLC, a consultant and service provider to wealthy families and family offices, since 2007.  Prior to his role with Barrantys, Mr. Wortham was an Executive Vice President of First Niagara Financial Group from 2005 to 2007, where his responsibilities included wealth management, risk management, and corporate marketing.  From 1999 to 2005, Mr. Wortham was the Executive Vice President of Global Private Client Services, Product Development, and Central Operations for The Bank of New York.  Mr. Wortham held several positions at Chase Manhattan Bank and Chemical Bank (currently JP Morgan Chase & Co.) from 1985 to 1999, including leading the Global Private Bank’s activities in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa while based in London, England.  He started his career at M&T Bank in retail banking from 1980 to 1985.  Mr. Wortham’s extensive experience in the financial services industry makes him a valuable member of our Board, and its Audit, Human Resource and Compensation, and Enterprise Risk Committees.  His expertise has been valuable in helping the Board evaluate the Company’s strategies to diversify its product offerings and revenue streams as a growing and competitive financial institution.

Mr. Connerton was appointed Treasurer of the Company and Chief Financial Officer of the Bank on November 30, 2015.  Prior to his appointment as Treasurer of the Company he had served as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company between 2002 and 2010 and again between 2013 and 2015. He has also served as Senior Vice President and Treasurer of the Bank since 2010.  Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Connerton was a Senior Auditor specializing in auditing and consulting for banking, healthcare and manufacturing clients at Deloitte & Touche LLP.

11


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Independence of Directors

21 

Board of Director Committees

23 

Director Compensation 

28 

Evans Bank Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2023  

31 

Human Resource and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

39 

Human Resource and Compensation Committee Report

40 

Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

41 

 

Executive Summary

41 

    Executive Compensation Philosophy

43 

Employment and Change in Control Agreements with our NEOs

45 

Pay Versus Performance Table

53 

Transactions with Related Persons

65 

Audit Committee Report

66 

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

67 

Proposal II — Advisory Vote on the Compensation Paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers

General

68 

Non-Binding Resolution

68 

Required Vote

68 

Proposal III — Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Required Vote

69 

Other Matters

69 

Shareholder Proposals for 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

70 


Proxy Summary

    Annual Meeting of Shareholders 

Date & Time

Location

Record Date

May 7, 2024

at 9:00 a.m. EST

Virtual Meeting

meetnow.global/MFSSWY9

March 11, 2024

Matters to be Voted Upon

Item

Board
Recommendation

Page

1.To elect the four nominees named in the Proxy Statement as directors of the Company, each for a three-year term and until his or her successor is elected and qualified.

FOR

2.To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers.

FOR

65 

3.To ratify the appointment of Crowe LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024.

FOR

66 

How to Vote as a Registered Shareholder

Picture 6

Picture 7

Picture 8

Mail

Phone

Internet

request, complete and return
a paper proxy card

toll-free 1-800-652-8683

within the USA, US territories

and Canada

www.envisionreports.com/EVBN

Picture 9

At the Virtual Meeting

by electronic vote at the

virtual meeting

i


EVANS BANCORP, INC.

6460 Main Street

Williamsville, NY 14221

Proxy Statement

Dated March 25, 2024 

For the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 7, 2024 

General Information

This Proxy Statement is furnished to the shareholders of Evans Bancorp, Inc., a New York corporation (the “Company”), in connection with the solicitation of proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held virtually at meetnow.global/MFSSWY9on Tuesday, May 7,  2024 at 9:00 a.m. EST and at any adjournments thereof.

Shares of common stock represented by a properly executed proxy will be voted in the manner instructed, or if no instructions are indicated, “FOR” the election of the director nominees named therein, “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, and “FOR” ratification of the appointment of Crowe LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2024. A proxy may be revoked at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by delivering to the Secretary of the Company a written revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting at the meeting. Any shareholder of record may vote at the Annual Meeting, whether or not he or she has previously given a proxy. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not have the effect of revoking a proxy unless you give proper written notice of revocation to the Secretary before the proxy is exercised or you vote by written ballot at the meeting. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy from the organization that holds your shares.

The enclosed proxy is being solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company. The total cost of solicitation of proxies in connection with the Annual Meeting will be borne by the Company.

Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

We are relying upon a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rule that allows us to furnish proxy materials to shareholders over the Internet. As a result, on or about March 25, 2024, we sent by mail or e-mail a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, including our Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders, over the Internet and how to vote. Internet availability of our proxy materials is designed to expedite receipt by shareholders and lower the cost and environmental impact of our Annual Meeting. However, if you received such a notice and would prefer to receive paper copies of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials.

If you received your proxy materials via e-mail, the e-mail contains voting instructions, including a control number required to vote your shares, and links to the Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to Shareholders on the Internet. If you received your proxy materials by mail, the Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement, proxy card and 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K are enclosed.

If you hold our common stock through more than one account, you may receive multiple copies of these proxy materials and will have to follow the instructions for each in order to vote all of your shares of our common stock.

www.edocumentview.com/EVBN

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials

for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be Held on May 7, 2024:

Our Proxy Statement and 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available

at www.edocumentview.com/EVBN

1


General Information

Questions and Answers About Our Annual Meeting

Q.Why Did I Receive this Proxy Statement?

Our Board is soliciting your proxy to vote at the meeting because you were a shareholder of our Company as of March 11, 2024, the Record Date, and are entitled to vote.

This Proxy Statement summarizes the information you need to know in order to cast a vote at the meeting.

Q.What Am I Voting On?

You are voting on three items:

election of directors named in this Proxy Statement

approval, by a non-binding advisory vote, of the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers (“Say on Pay”)

ratification of the appointment of Crowe LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2024 

Q.How Do I Vote?

Shareholders of record – registered shareholders

If you are a shareholder of record, there are four ways to Vote:

Picture 10

Picture 11

Picture 12

Picture 13

By Telephone

By Internet

By Mail

At the Virtual Meeting

toll-free 1-800-652-8683 within the USA, US territories and Canada

www.envisionreports.com/EVBN

request, complete and return a paper proxy card

by electronic vote at the virtual meeting

Street name holders

Shares of our common stock that are held in a brokerage account in the name of the broker or by a bank, trustee, or other nominee are held in “street name.” If your shares are held in street name, you should follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank, trustee, or other nominee. If you hold your shares in street name and wish to vote at the meeting, please obtain instructions on how to vote at the meeting from your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee.

Q.What Are the Voting Recommendations of the Board of Directors?

Matter

Board
Recommendation

Election of the four directors named in this Proxy Statement

FOR EACH NOMINEE

Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers (“Say on Pay”)

FOR

Ratification of the appointment of Crowe LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2024

FOR

If you return a properly executed proxy card without instructions, the persons named as proxies will vote your shares in accordance with the recommendations of our Board.

2


General Information

Q.Will Any Other Matters Be Voted On?

We do not know of any other matters that will be brought before the shareholders for a vote at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter is properly brought before the meeting, your signed paper or electronic proxy gives authority to the proxy holders, with full power of substitution, to vote your shares at their discretion.

Q.Why Haven’t I Received a Printed Copy of the Proxy Statement or Annual Report?

We are taking advantage of Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules that allow companies to furnish proxy materials to shareholders via the Internet. This allows us to avoid printing and mailing proxy materials to shareholders who prefer to review the materials online. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or “Notice,” by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials, unless you submit a specific request.

The Notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the Proxy Statement and annual report as well as how to submit your proxy over the Internet. If you received the Notice and would still like to receive a printed copy of the proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting these materials included in the Notice. We plan to mail the Notice to shareholders on or about March 25, 2024. 

Q.Who Can Attend the Annual Meeting Virtually?

Any Evans Bancorp, Inc. shareholder as of the close of business on the Record Date may attend the virtual meeting. To participate in the Annual Meeting, visit meetnow.global/MFSSWY9.  

You will need the control number included in the shaded box on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.  The meeting will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time on May 7, 2024.  We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time leaving ample time for check in.

Shareholders who hold their shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, must register in advance to vote and/or ask questions at the Annual Meeting. To register, shareholders must submit proof of proxy power (legal proxy) reflecting their Evans Bancorp, Inc. holdings along with their name and email address to Computershare at legalproxy@computershare.com. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 22, 2024. Shareholders will receive a confirmation email with a control number from Computershare regarding their registration.

Q.Who Is Entitled to Vote at the Meeting? 

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date of March 11, 2024 are entitled to receive notice of and to participate virtually in the Annual Meeting. If you were a shareholder of record on that date, you will be entitled to vote all of the shares you held on that date at the meeting, or at any postponement or adjournment thereof.

Q.How Many Votes Do I Have?

You will have one vote for each share of our common stock you owned at the close of business on the Record Date.

Q.What Constitutes a Quorum for the Annual Meeting?

The presence of the holders of a majority (greater than 50%) of the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting constitutes a quorum. Presence may be in person or by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present and entitled to vote at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum. Virtual attendance at our Annual Meeting constitutes presence in person for purposes of a quorum at the meeting.

Q.What Vote Is Required to Approve Each Proposal?

With respect to Item 1, subject to our majority voting policy described under the heading “Corporate Governance – Independence of Directors – Director Majority Voting Policy” in this Proxy Statement, directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast, without regard to either broker non-votes or abstentions. Plurality voting means that the number of candidates who receive the highest number of votes will be elected.  Brokers do not have discretionary authority with respect to the election of directors.

3


General Information

With respect to Items 2 and 3, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is required for approval, assuming a quorum is present. With respect to Item 2, because this vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board; however, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee and the Board have in the past considered and will continue to consider the outcome of the vote when making decisions for future executive compensation arrangements.

Brokers have discretionary authority to vote with respect to the ratification of the appointment of independent registered public accountants. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote with respect to the other proposals. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on Items 1, 2 and 3.

Q.What if I am a Beneficial Owner and Do Not Give Voting Instructions to My Broker? What is a Broker Non-Vote?

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held in “street name” (i.e., held of record by a broker, bank, trustee, or other nominee), you must instruct the broker, bank, trustee or other nominee how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker, bank, trustee or other nominee does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a “broker non-vote.” In these cases, the nominee can register your shares as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required. For the 2024 meeting, your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors or on the advisory vote to approve the Company’s executive compensation (the “Say-on-Pay” vote). If you do not provide voting instructions, a broker non-vote will occur and your shares will not be voted on these matters. Accordingly, it is particularly important that beneficial owners instruct their brokers how they wish to vote their shares.

Q.Can I Change My Vote or Revoke My Proxy?

Yes. You may change or revoke your proxy by sending in a new proxy card with a later date, casting a new vote by telephone or Internet or sending a written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary at Evans Bancorp, Inc., 6460 Main Street Williamsville, NY 14221. If you attend the meeting virtually and wish to vote at the meeting, you may request that your previously submitted proxy be revoked.

Q.How Will My Shares Be Voted if I Submit a Proxy Without Indicating My Vote?

If you submit a properly executed proxy without indicating your vote, your shares will be voted as follows:

FOR each director nominee named in this Proxy Statement;

FOR the approval, by a non-binding advisory vote, of the Company’s executive compensation; and

FOR ratification of the appointment of Crowe LLP as our independent registered public accountants for 2024.  

Q.Who to contact if I have questions about my shareholder information? 

You can contact Computershare Investor Services by phone 888-294-8217 or by mail at P.O. Box 505005, Louisville, KY 40233-5005.  

Voting Securities

Only holders of shares of common stock of record at the close of business on March 11, 2024 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and at all adjournments thereof. At the close of business on March 11, 2024, the Company had 5,508,593 shares of common stock outstanding. For all matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share.

A quorum of shareholders is necessary to hold a valid Annual Meeting. A majority of shares entitled to vote, present virtually or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Broker non-votes and abstentions will be counted as being present or represented at the Annual Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs on an item when a broker is not permitted to vote on that item without timely instruction from the beneficial owner of the shares and no instruction is given.

4


Vote Required and Board Recommendations

Proposal

Vote Required

Board Recommendation

I.Election of Directors

Plurality of the votes cast, subject to the majority

voting policy adopted by the Board of Directors

“FOR” election of the nominated
directors

IIAdvisory “Say-on-Pay” Vote

Majority of the votes cast

“FOR” the approval, on an advisory
basis, of the compensation paid to
our named executive officers

III.Ratification of Appointment of Independent Public Accounting Firm for 2024

Majority of the votes cast

“FOR” ratification of the
appointment of Crowe LLP

Plurality Vote – Proposal I

Subject to our majority voting policy described under the heading “Corporate Governance – Independence of Directors – Director Majority Voting Policy” in this Proxy Statement, under New York law and the Company’s bylaws, directors are elected by the affirmative vote, virtually or by proxy, of a plurality of the votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum is present, without regard to broker non-votes or abstentions. This means that, for Proposal I, the four director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement will be elected if they receive more affirmative votes than any other nominees. However, under our majority voting policy, any director nominee who receives a greater number of votes “WITHHELD” than “FOR” their election must tender their resignation for the Board’s consideration.

Majority Vote – Proposals II and III

Proposals II and III must be approved by a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. This means that, in order for each of these proposals to be approved by the Company’s shareholders, the number of votes cast “For” a particular proposal must be greater than the number of votes cast “Against” that proposal.

Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes

If you hold your shares (i.e., they are registered) through a bank, broker or other nominee in “street name” but you do not provide the firm that holds your shares with your specific voting instructions, it will only be allowed to vote your shares on your behalf in its discretion on “routine” matters, but it cannot vote your shares in its discretion on your behalf on any “non-routine” matters. This result is known as a “broker non-vote”. Proposal I relating to the election of your Board’s nominees for Directors and Proposal II relating to Say on Pay are considered “non-routine” matters. Proposal III relating to the appointment of the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2024 is considered a “routine” matter. While your broker will have discretionary authority to vote your uninstructed shares “for” or “against” or “abstain” from voting on Proposal III, your broker will have no discretionary authority to vote your shares on Proposals I and II at the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares in street name, please follow the voting instructions sent to you by your bank, broker or other nominee.

Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting. However, broker non-votes will not be treated as votes “cast” at the Annual Meeting and will have no effect on the outcome of any of the proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting. Likewise, for Proposals I, II, and III, abstentions will not be treated as votes “cast” at the Annual Meeting and will have no effect on the outcome of these Proposals.

Security Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth information, as of March 11, 2024, concerning:

Each person whom we know beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock.

Each of our directors and nominees for the Board of Directors.

Each of our Named Executive Officers, as defined below under “Executive Compensation”.

All of our directors and executive officers as a group.

5


General Information

Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to our securities. Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned. The number of shares beneficially owned by each person as of March 11, 2024 includes shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire on or within 60 days after March 11, 2024 upon the exercise of vested stock options and also includes shares of restricted stock that are subject to forfeiture and transfer restrictions until the vesting date thereof. For each person or group included in the table below, percentage ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person, calculated as described in the previous sentence, by the sum of the 5,508,593 shares of common stock outstanding on March 11, 2024 plus the number of shares of common stock that such person or group has the right to acquire on or within 60 days after March 11, 2024. Beneficial ownership representing less than one percent is denoted with an asterisk “*”.



 

 

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

Number of Shares Beneficially Owned

 

Percent of Class

Directors, Director Nominees and Officers

 

 

 

Michael A. Battle

4,452

 

*

John B. Connerton (1)

28,953

 

*

Dawn DePerrior

1,227

 

*

Robert A. James

1,227

 

*

Jody L. Lomeo

5,978

 

*

Kevin D. Maroney (2)

11,638

 

*

Robert G. Miller, Jr. (3)

76,353

 

1.38%

Kimberley A. Minkel

3,903

 

*

David J. Nasca (4)

140,026

 

2.52%

Christina P. Orsi

3,843

 

*

Kenneth D. Pawlak (5)

5,752

 

*

David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr.

5,540

 

*

Michael J. Rogers

7,995

 

*

Nora B. Sullivan

6,060

 

*

Thomas H. Waring, Jr. (6)

17,819

 

*

Lee C. Wortham

20,538

 

*

Directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group; 16 persons (7)

341,304

 

6.11%



 

 

 

FJ Capital Management LLC (8)

540,233 

 

9.81%

7901 Jones Branch Drive, Suite 210, McLean, VA 22102

 

 

 



 

 

 

PL Capital Advisors, LLC (9)

522,649 

 

9.49%

750 Eleventh Street South, Suite 202, Naples, FL 34102

 

 

 



 

 

 

BlackRock Inc. (10)

364,824 

 

6.62%

50 Hudson Yards, New York, NY 10001

 

 

 



 

 

 

Manulife Financial Corporation (11)

297,988 

 

5.41%

200 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4W 1E5

 

 

 



 

 

 

Vanguard Group (12)

279,679 

 

5.08%

100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355

 

 

 



 

 

 

6


(1)

Includes 9,503 shares that Mr. Connerton may acquire by exercise of options exercisable on March 11, 2024 or within 60 days thereafter and 4,042 shares of restricted stock that are subject to forfeiture and transfer restrictions until the vesting date thereof.

(2)

Mr. Maroney discontinued service on the Board of Directors following the Annual Meeting.

(3)

Includes 16,160 shares that Mr. Miller may acquire by exercise of options exercisable on March 11, 2024 or within 60 days thereafter.  Mr. Miller discontinued service on the Board of Directors following the Annual Meeting.

(4)

Includes 2,344 shares owned jointly by Mr. Nasca and his wife, 552 shares owned by Mr. Nasca’s children, 44,865 shares that Mr. Nasca may acquire by exercise of options exercisable on March 11, 2024 or within 60 days thereafter and 10,338 shares of restricted stock that are subject to forfeiture and transfer restrictions until the vesting date thereof.

(5)

Includes 7,057 shares that Mr. Pawlak may acquire by exercise of options exercisable on March 11, 2024 or within 60 days thereafter and 3,672 shares of restricted stock that are subject to forfeiture and transfer restrictions until the vesting date thereof. 

(6)

Includes 1,321 shares held by Mr. Waring’s wife.

(7)

Includes 77,585 shares that such persons may acquire by exercise of options exercisable on March 11, 2024 or within 60 days thereafter.

(8)

Based on the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 6, 2024. According to that report, the aggregate holdings consist of 540,233 shares held by Financial Opportunity Fund LLC of which FJ Capital Management LLC is the managing member.  Martin Friedman is the managing member of FJ Capital Management LLC (reporting shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 540,233 shares).

(9)

Based on the most recently available Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on September 7, 2023 on behalf of PL Capital Advisors, LLC, Richard J. Lashley, a managing member of PL Capital Advisors, and John W. Palmer, a managing member of PL Capital Advisors. PL Capital Advisors, Richard J. Lashley, and John W. Palmer reported shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 522,649 shares.

(10)

Based on the most recent available Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 26, 2024 on behalf of BlackRock, Inc.  BlackRock, Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 358,827 and sole dispositive power with respect to 364,824 shares.

(11)

Based on the most recently available Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024 on behalf of Manulife Financial Corporation (“MFC”) and MFC’s indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries, Manulife Investment Management (US) LLC (“MIM (US)”), and Manulife Investment Management Limited (“MIML”). MIM (US) reported sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 296,539 shares, and MIML reported sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 1,449 shares.

(12)

Based on the most recently available Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024 on behalf of The Vanguard Group.  The Vanguard Group reported shared voting power of 2,371 shares, sole dispositive power of 275,406 shares, and shared dispositive power of 4,273 shares. 

Equity Compensation Plans. All equity compensation plans maintained by the Company were approved by the Company’s shareholders. Shown below is certain information as of December 31, 2023 concerning the shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under existing equity compensation plans. 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders

 

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options

 

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options

 

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (1)

Evans Bancorp, Inc. 2019 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan

 

 

47,090 

 

$

33.30 

 

184,300 

Evans Bancorp, Inc. 2009 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan

 

 

108,270 

 

$

29.83 

 

-    

Evans Bancorp, Inc Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

 

-    

 

 

-    

 

34,175 

Total

 

 

155,360 

 

$

32.25 

 

218,475 

(1)This column excludes shares reflected under the column “Number of Securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options.”

7


Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) requires the Company’s officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Company’s common stock, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. Officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company and written representations from the Company’s officers and directors, the Company believes that during or with respect to fiscal year 2023, all reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act were timely filed, except that Mr. Nasca and Mr. Connerton each filed a report on Form 4 that was one day late for transactions relating to the issuance of restricted stock units of 2,394 and 939, respectively.

8


Proposal I – Election of Directors

The Company’s bylaws provide for a classified board of directors, with three classes of directors, each nearly as equal in number as possible. Each class serves for a three-year term, and one class is elected each year. The Board of Directors is authorized by the Company’s bylaws to fix from time to time, the number of directors that constitute the whole Board of Directors. The Board size has been set at twelve members. The nominees for director at the 2024 Annual Meeting are: Dawn DePerrior, Kimberley A. Minkel, Christina P. Orsi, and Michael J. Rogers - for terms to expire at the 2027 Annual Meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any nominee would be unable or unwilling to serve, if elected. In the event that any nominee for director becomes unavailable and a vacancy exists, it is intended that the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors will recommend a substitute nominee for approval by the Board of Directors.

Required Vote

Subject to our majority voting policy described under the heading “Corporate Governance – Independence of Directors – Director Majority Voting Policy” in this Proxy Statement, under New York law and the Company’s bylaws, directors are elected by the affirmative vote, in person or by proxy, of a plurality of the votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum is present, without regard to either broker non-votes or abstentions. This means that, for Proposal I, the four director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement will be elected if they receive more affirmative votes than any other nominees. 

Unless otherwise directed, the persons named in the proxy card intend to vote shares as to which proxies are received “FOR” each of the director nominees:  Dawn DePerrior, Kimberley A. Minkel, Christina P. Orsi, and Michael J. Rogers.

THE COMPANY’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

9


Proposal I – Election of Directors

Information Regarding Directors, Director Nominees and
Executive Officers

Corporate Governance 

11 of 12 Board Members are independent

All members of the Audit, Human Resource and Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees are independent

Positions of Chairman and CEO have been separated since 2001

All directors are in compliance with stock ownership requirements

A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated

A pie chart with numbers and a number

Description automatically generatedA pie chart with text on it

Description automatically generatedA pie chart with numbers and a number

Description automatically generated

Board Qualifications Tenure Gender Age

10


Proposal I – Election of Directors

The following tables set forth the names, ages, and positions of the director nominees, the directors continuing in office, and the executive officers of the Company:

Nominees for Director:



 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Age

 

Position

 

Term to Expire

Dawn DePerrior

 

65

 

Director

 

2027

Kimberley A. Minkel

 

58

 

Director

 

2027

Christina P. Orsi

 

52

 

Director

 

2027

Michael J. Rogers

 

66

 

Director

 

2027

Directors Continuing in Office and Executive Officers:



 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Age

 

Position

 

Term Expires

Michael A. Battle

 

68

 

Director

 

2026

Robert A. James

 

56

 

Director

 

2026

Jody L. Lomeo

 

55

 

Director

 

2026

David J. Nasca †

 

66

 

Director

 

2025



 

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company

 

 



 

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer of Evans Bank, N.A.

 

 

David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr.

 

54

 

Director

 

2025

Nora B. Sullivan

 

66

 

Director

 

2026

Thomas H. Waring, Jr.

 

66

 

Director

 

2025

Lee C. Wortham

 

66

 

Director

 

2025

John B. Connerton †

 

57

 

Treasurer of the Company

 

---



 

 

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Evans Bank, N.A.

 

 

Kenneth D. Pawlak †

 

59

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Growth Officer

 

---



 

 

 

of Evans Bank, N.A.

 

 

Executive Officer

11


Proposal I – Election of Directors

Directors, Director Nominees and Executive Officer Information

Set forth below are the biographies of (1) each of the nominees and continuing directors containing information regarding the person’s service as a director, business experience, director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Board to determine that the person should serve as a director for the Company, and (2) the executive officers of the Company.

Nominees for Director

  Dawn DePerrior  

A close-up of a person

Description automatically generated

Age: 65

Director Since:  2023

Committees:

Audit, Enterprise Risk

Biographical Information

Ms. DePerrior has been a director of the Company since 2023. She was most recently a Managing Director, Advisory Services, for Ernst & Young. She led multiple business transformation initiatives powered by technology and aimed at improving customer experiences and business results. A lifelong digital leader, DePerrior has led all aspects of information technology, including business transformation, cyber security, digitization, data, analytics, innovation, mergers and acquisition integration, finance and strategy. Her 40-year career is defined by its breadth and depth of experiences, enabling her to bring creative ideas and inspire large teams to solve their most complex problems.

Ms. DePerrior and the team she led received the University of Rochester’s prestigious Meliora award for digitizing patient care delivery processes and electronic health records.  She was twice recognized as one of Rochester’s “Technology Women of the Year.”  Previously, Ms. DePerrior was a member of the board of directors for Fairport Savings Bank.

We believe that Ms. DePerrior’s vast knowledge and experience within information technology, cyber security, finance and strategy, and digitization, among others, qualify her to serve on our Board of Directors and its Audit Committee and Enterprise Risk Committee.

12


Proposal I – Election of Directors

  Kimberley A. Minkel  

Picture 2

Independent Director

Age: 58

Director Since:  2018

Committees:

Human Resource and Compensation, Enterprise Risk

Biographical Information

Ms. Minkel has been a director of the Company since 2018. She has been President and Executive Director of the Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority (“NFTA”) since 2010. Ms. Minkel is responsible for managing a transportation system including light rail, bus, paratransit, and two airports within Western New York. She manages an annual $360 million operating and capital budget that provides efficient and professional transportation services while engaging with board members, over 1,600 employees, stakeholders, and the general public in a manner consistent with the needs of a diverse community. Before her role as President and Executive Director of the NFTA, Ms. Minkel served as Director of Risk, Health, Safety, and Environmental Quality for the NFTA. In this role, she provided functional leadership within the areas of risk management including loss control, environmental, and safety.

We believe Ms. Minkel’s extensive executive experience and community leadership qualify her to serve on our Board of Directors and its Human Resource and Compensation Committee and Enterprise Risk Committee.

  Christina P. Orsi  

A person with long hair

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Independent Director

Age: 52

Director Since:  2018

Committees:

Corporate Governance and Nominating, Committees, are independent, as affirmatively determined by the Board, consistent with the criteria established by NYSE AmericanHuman Resource and as required by our bylaws.Compensation

Biographical Information

 

The BoardMrs. Orsi has conducted an annual reviewbeen a director of director independencethe Company since 2018. She is President of the John R. Oishei Foundation, the most comprehensive private foundation in Western New York, focusing on a broad range of interrelated issues, and offering philanthropic support that goes far beyond funding.  Mrs. Orsi is responsible for guiding the long-term strategic direction of the Foundation, supporting and empowering staff to respond quickly and effectively to the community’s needs, and driving its mission to improve the quality of life for all current nomineesWestern New Yorkers.  Prior to that she was the Associate Vice President of the Office of Economic Development for election as directorsthe University at Buffalo (“UB”) since 2015. In this role, Mrs. Orsi lead UB’s Business and all continuing directors.  DuringEntrepreneur Partnership with a focus on connecting business with UB faculty for collaboration on research and development; enabling business access to programs like START UP NY to help companies grow in New York State; and supporting the commercialization of faculty inventions to move the from idea to market. From 2007-2015, she was the Executive Director of the Regional Economic Development Council and Regional Director for Western New York for the Empire State Development Corporation. In this review,role, Mrs. Orsi provided strategic direction for the Regional Economic Development Council, established collaboration among diverse leaders throughout Buffalo Niagara, and led implementation of the Buffalo Billion Investment Strategy.

We believe that Mrs. Orsi’s extensive knowledge of economic development programs, private sector policy issues, and government agencies at the state, regional, and municipal levels qualify her to serve on our Board considered transactions and relationships during the prior year between each director or any member of his or her immediate family and the CompanyDirectors and its subsidiaries, affiliatesCorporate Governance and principal shareholders, including those of the type described below under “Transactions with Related Persons.”  The Board also examined transactionsNominating Committee and relationships between directors or their affiliatesHuman Resource and members of senior management or their affiliates.  The purpose of this review was to determine whether any such relationships or transactions were inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent.Compensation Committee.

 

As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that the nominees Kimberley Minkel, Christina Orsi,

13


Proposal I – Election of Directors

 Michael J. Rogers  and Oliver H. Sommer meet the Company’s standard of independence, as do the following continuing directors: Michael A. Battle, James E. Biddle, Jr., Jody L. Lomeo, David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr., Nora B. Sullivan, Thomas H. Waring, Jr., and Lee C. Wortham.   David J. Nasca and Robert G. Miller, Jr. were determined not to be independent because they are currently executive officers of the Company. 

A person wearing glasses and a suit

Description automatically generated with low confidence

Independent Director-Vice Chairman

 

Leadership Structure.Age:  John R. O’Brien66

Director Since:  2011

Committees:

Audit (Chair),

Enterprise Risk

Biographical Information

Mr. Rogers has served as Chairmanbeen a director of the Company’s BoardCompany since 2011. He is a certified public accountant in New York State and the managing member of Directorsa real estate development company, Oakgrove Development, LLC, a position he has held since April 2012.2009. Mr. Rogers was the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Great Lakes Bancorp, Inc., the parent company of Greater Buffalo Savings Bank, from 2006 to 2008. From 2004 to 2006, he worked as an independent consultant, principally on Sarbanes-Oxley initiatives and business rationalization reviews. Mr. Rogers worked at KPMG LLP, a leading accounting firm, from 1984 to 2004, serving as an audit partner from 1995 to 2004. In his capacityrole as Chairman,an auditor at KPMG LLP, Mr. O’Brien chairs meetingsRogers worked on several engagements for financial institutions, particularly banks.

We believe Mr. Rogers’ many years of experience have provided him with a very strong knowledge base of the Boardbanking industry. His previous roles as an audit partner, SEC reviewing partner, and executive sessionsCFO also demonstrate his high level of competence in the areas of finance and accounting in general, and SEC reporting in particular, and qualify him to be our Audit Committee Chair and a member of the Board, coordinates the activities of the other independent directors,Board’s Enterprise Risk Committee, and performs such other duties and responsibilities asprovides the Board of Directors may determine.  These duties also include chairing meetingsan additional expert on these matters in an increasingly complex regulatory environment.

14


Directors Continuing in Office and Executive Officers

  Michael A. Battle  

A person in a suit

Description automatically generated with low confidence

Independent Director

Age:  68

Director Since:  2016

Committees:

Enterprise Risk, Corporate Governance and Nominating (Chair)

Biographical Information

Mr. Battle has been a director of the Company’s shareholders, overseeing the preparation of agendas for meetingsCompany since 2016. He has been a partner of the Board, keeping directors informed throughWashington, DC office of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, specializing in white collar criminal defense, as a member of the timely distributionfirm’s Litigation Department since April 2016. Mr. Battle’s practice focuses on commercial and civil litigation, white collar criminal matters, and appeals. Prior to his role with Barnes & Thornburg, Mr. Battle was a senior partner of informationSchlam, Stone & Dolan LLP from 2010 – April 2016 and reports, maintaining contact withwas a partner of Fulbright & Jaworski LLP from 2007 – 2010. He was Director of the Company’s CEO between meetings to stay current on developmentsExecutive Office for United States Attorneys from 2005 – 2007, providing administrative oversight of all 93 United States Attorneys and to determine when it may be appropriate to alert the Board to significant pending developments, serving as a liaison between independent directorsthe United States Attorneys and the CEO with respect to sensitive issues,Justice Department and other matters.federal agencies. Mr. Battle served as United States Attorney with the United States Attorney’s Office, Western District of New York, from 2002 – 2005. From 1996 – 2002, he was appointed by Governor George Pataki (and subsequently elected) to serve as Judge for Erie County Family Court, providing rulings in thousands of family-law and matrimonial cases. Mr. Battle served as Attorney in Charge with the New York State Attorney’s Office, Buffalo Regional Office, from 1995 – 1996. He was the Assistant Federal Defender with the Federal Defender’s Office, Western New York, from 1992 – 1995 and Assistant United States Attorney with the United States Attorney’s Office, Western District of New York, from 1985 – 1992. Mr. Battle began his career as an Attorney with the Legal Aid Society of New York, Civil Division, from 1981 – 1985.

 

We believe that Mr. O’Brien has announced his intention to retire as Chairman of the BoardBattle’s wide-ranging and asextensive legal and governance experience make him a valuable member of theour Board of Directors effective March 31, 2018.  The Company has announced that, effective April 1, 2018, Mr. Wortham will succeed Mr. O’Brien as Chairman and Mr. Sommer will succeed Mr. Wortham as Vice Chairman.

We separated the positionsits Enterprise Risk Committee and Chair of Chairman and CEO in 2001.  While the separation of these positions is not required by our bylaws, we believe that it is the most appropriate leadership structure for us at this time.  We believe that it is advantageous to separate the two positions in order to provide for independent director control over Board agenda and information flow, encourage open and lively communication between the independent directors and management, and to help balance the leadership of the Board.

Board of Directors Stock Ownership. Upon his or her first election or appointment to the Board of Directors, a new director must hold, or must obtain within 60 calendar days after such election or appointment, not less than $10,000 aggregate market value of the Company's common stock, based on the trailing 365-day average price.  A new director has a period of 5 years from the beginning of such director’s term of office to obtain the required $50,000 aggregate market value of the Company’s common stock, discussed below under “Board of Director Committees – Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee”.  The value of a new director’s qualifying shares at the beginning of his or her term in office will be determined as of the date purchased or the date on which the individual becomes a director, whichever value is greater.  As of the date of this Proxy Statement, all directors are in compliance with the Board of Directors stock ownership requirements.Committee.

12

15

 


Directors Continuing in Office 

  Robert A. James  

A person in a suit and tie

Description automatically generated

 

 

OversightAge:  56

Director Since:  2023

Committees:

Audit,  Human Resource and Compensation

Biographical Information

Mr. James has been a director of Risk Management.  the Company since 2023.  In 2017,2023, Mr. James joined CGT Staffing, a Pittsburgh-based staffing company with a national scope, as Chief Diversity and Strategic Growth Officer.  He is responsible for the design and implementation of innovative strategies to drive company market share growth. Prior to joining CGT Staffing, Mr. James served as Vice President for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Corporate Strategies for Allegheny Health Network/Highmark Health, a $24 billion national, blended health organization based in Pittsburgh, PA.  In this role, Mr. James was responsible for implementing and advising upon Highmark Health’s non-Allegheny Health Network affiliates a comprehensive diversity, equity, and inclusion strategy.  He joined Highmark in 2015 as Supplier Diversity Program Director.  Prior to joining Allegheny Health Network and Highmark Health, he served in a legal advisory role with the Office of Minority and Women Inclusion at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  A practicing lawyer for more than 20 years, Mr. James spent several years facilitating Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) financings nationally for capital projects through a U.S. Department of Education program.

We believe Mr. James’ expertise in diversity, equity, and inclusion and legal experience qualify him to serve on our Board of Directors established an Enterprise Risk Committee (“ERC”), which is responsible for overseeing and approving company-wide risk management practices throughout the Company, overseeing management’s risk assessment process and risk management infrastructure, reviewing management’s risk-management framework in the context of the Company’s size and business activities, and advising on risks that the Company may face. The ERC will review and discuss with management, at least annually, the Company’s risk governance structure and the Company’s risk management and risk assessment guidelines and policies regarding market, credit, operations, liquidity, funding, reputation and franchise risk, and the Company’s risk tolerance. The ERC will review at least quarterly the major risk exposures of the Company and its business units against established risk management methodologiesAudit Committee and targets. The Board’s role in the Company’s risk oversight process includes receiving reports, at least quarterly, from members of senior management on areas of material risk to the Company, including operational, financial, credit, liquidity, legal and regulatory, and strategic and reputational risks.  The full Board (or the appropriate committee in the case of risks that are under the purview of a particular committee) receives these reports from the appropriate “risk owner” within the organization to enable it to understand our risk identification, risk management and risk mitigation strategies.  When a committee receives the report, the chairman of the relevant committee reports on the discussion to the full Board during the committee reports portion of the next Board meeting.  This enables the Board and its committees to coordinate the risk oversight role, particularly with respect to risk interrelationships.  The Board’s role in the Company’s risk oversight process has not directly impacted its leadership structure.

Compensation Risk.    The Human Resource and Compensation Committee considers riskCommittee.

  Jody L. Lomeo  

A person wearing glasses and a suit

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Independent Director

Age:  55

Director Since:  2017

Committees:

Corporate Governance and its influence on the Company's compensation programs. This Committee reviews each compensation element individuallyNominating, Human Resource and in the aggregate to ensure that the overall compensation program providesCompensation (Chair)

Biographical Information

Mr. Lomeo has been a balanced perspective that ultimately aligns pay with performance while also ensuring bonus / incentive programs do not motivate inappropriate risk-taking.  Equity award levels and practices are set to foster shared interests between management and shareholders, but are not considered by the Committee to be at levels that would drive inappropriate behavior. In the Committee's judgment, the compensation policies and practicesdirector of the Company do not give rise to material risks.

since 2017. As of December 31, 2020 Mr. Lomeo retired as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Kaleida Health, a healthcare provider in Western New York. He served as Kaleida Health’s President and CEO since 2014. In addition to Kaleida Health, since 2014 he served as the Company is subject to guidance issued byPresident and Chief Executive Officer of the FDIC,Great Lakes Health System of Western New York, the FRBparent organization responsible for integrating the clinical activities of Kaleida Health, Erie County Medical Center Corporation (ECMC), University at Buffalo and the OCC designed to ensure that incentive compensation arrangements at banking organizations appropriately tie rewards to longer-term performance and do not undermine the safety and soundnessCenter for Hospice & Palliative Care. Mr. Lomeo served as CEO of the firm or create undue risks to the financial system.  This guidance embodies three core principles, which are: (1) incentive compensation arrangements at a banking organization should provide employees incentives that appropriately balance risk and financial results in a manner that does not encourage employees to expose their organizations to imprudent risks; (2) these arrangements should be compatible with effective controls and risk management, and (3) these arrangements should be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the organization’s board of directors.  ECMC from 2009 – 2014.

We believe thatMr. Lomeo’s significant executive experience and community leadership qualify him to serve as an integral member of our incentive compensation programs are in compliance with this guidance.Board of Directors and its Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and to Chair our Human Resource and Compensation Committee.

16


Directors Continuing in Office 

  David J. Nasca  

A person in a suit and tie

Description automatically generated

 

Policy for Age:  66

Director Attendance at Annual MeetingSince:.  It is the policy  2006

Committees:

Enterprise Risk

Biographical Information

Mr. Nasca has been a director of the Company that all directors be present at the Annual Meeting, barring unforeseen or extenuating circumstances.  All directors who were then serving were present at the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting.    

13


Shareholder Communications with the Board of Directors.    Shareholders and other parties interested in communicating directly with the Company’s Board of Directors may do so by writing to the Evans Bancorp, Inc. Board of Directors, One Grimsby Drive, Hamburg, NY 14075.  All correspondence received under this process is compiled and summarized by the Executive Assistant tosince 2006. Mr. Nasca also serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and presented to the Board of Directors, in accordance with our Policy for Communication to the Board of Directors.  Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters are handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee, as set forth in our Employee Complaint Procedure for AccountingPresident and Auditing Matters.  Each of these policies is available in the Governance Documents section of the Company’s website (www.evansbancorp.com), which can be found under the “Corporate Overview” tab.

Code of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer of the Bank. He has held the position of President of the Company and Principalthe Bank since 2006, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank since 2007. Mr. Nasca served as Chief Operating Officer of LifeStage, LLC, a health care services startup company, from October 2005 to August 2006. From June 2004 to July 2005, He served as Executive Vice President of Strategic Initiatives of First Niagara Financial Officers.  Group. Mr. Nasca held the position of Executive Vice President, Consumer Banking Group, Central New York Regional Executive of First Niagara Financial Group from June 2002 through June 2004. From October 2000 to June 2002, Mr. Nasca served as President and CEO of Iroquois Financial, Inc. and Cayuga Bank which were wholly owned by First Niagara Financial Group.

We believe Mr. Nasca provides our Board with information gained from hands-on management of our operations, identifying our near-term and long-term challenges and opportunities. The CompanyBoard has a "Chief Executive Officer/Treasurer/Controller Code of Ethics," which is applicable to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer.  The "Chief Executive Officer/Treasurer/ControllerCode of Ethics" is availabledetermined that Mr. Nasca’s significant experience in the Governance Documents sectionbanking industry over the past 39 years, including operational, financial, and executive roles, as well as his unique perspective as leader of the Company’s website (www.evansbancorp.com), which can be found under the “Corporate Overview” tab.  The Company intends to post amendments to or waivers from its codeour management team, qualifies him for service as a member of ethics at this location on its website.

Board Meetings and Attendance atour Board of Director and Committee Meetings.  The Company’s Board of Directors met eleven times during fiscal 2017,  including one strategic planning meeting.  Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of: (1) all meetings of the Company’s Board of Directors (held during the period for which he or she served as a director) and (2) all meetings held by the committees of the Company’s Board of Directors on which he or she served (during the periods that he or she served).Directors.

Availability of Committee Charters and Other Corporate Governance Documents.  Current copies of the written charters for the Audit Committee, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, copies of the Company's "Chief Executive Officer/Treasurer/Controller Code of Ethics" and the "Code of Conduct," the "Policy for Communication to the Board of Directors," and the “Employee Complaint Procedure for Accounting and Auditing Matters” are available in the Governance Documents section of the Company's website (www.evansbancorp.com), which can be found under the “Corporate Overview” tab.

BOARD OF DIRECTOR COMMITTEES

The Company’s Board of Directors has four outstanding committees: the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee and the Enterprise Risk Committee.  The members of each committee have been nominated by the Chairman of the Board of Directors and approved by the full Board.  The names of the members of the Audit Committee, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, together with a brief description of their functions, are set forth below.

 

 

Audit Committee:



  David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr.  

 

 

Michael J. Rogers, Chairman

Nora B. Sullivan

John R. O'Brien

Lee C. Wortham

The Audit Committee met six times during fiscal 2017.  The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing the financial information of the Company that will be provided to shareholders and others, overseeing the systems of internal controls which management and the Board of Directors have established, selecting and monitoring the performance of the Company’s independent auditors, and overseeing the Company’s audit and financial reporting processes.  The Board of Directors has determined that John R. O’Brien, Michael J.

14


Rogers, Nora B. Sullivan and Lee C. Wortham each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K, and that each member of the Audit Committee is an "independent director" in accordance with applicable NYSE American listing requirements, including the heightened independence requirements applicable to Audit Committee members, and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act.  The Board of Directors has adopted an Audit Committee Charter, which is available in the Governance Documents section of the Company's website at www.evansbancorp.com, which can be found under the “Corporate Overview” tab.

Human Resource and Compensation Committee:

Thomas H. Waring, Jr., Chairman

John R. O’Brien

James E. Biddle, Jr.

Lee C. Wortham

David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr.

 

 

The Human Resource and Compensation Committee met six times during fiscal 2017.  The Human Resource and Compensation Committee is responsible for administering the Company’s 2009 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan and awarding new grants thereunder, for administering the Evans Excels Performance Incentive Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Executive Severance Plan, the SERP Plans (defined below), the Deferred Compensation Plan, and the Executive Incentive Retirement Plan for making such determinations and recommendations as the Human Resource and Compensation Committee deems necessary or appropriate regarding the remuneration and benefits of employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and, in addition, for reviewing with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and providing a report recommending to the Board of Directors whether the Compensation Discussion and Analysis should be included in the Proxy Statement.

A person in a suit

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

 

The Human Resource and Compensation Committee has the authority to act on behalf of the Board of Directors in setting compensation policy, administering Board or shareholder approved compensation plans, approving benefit programs and making decisions for the Board with respect to compensation of senior management.  Except as otherwise required by the applicable rules of the SEC or the NYSE American, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee may delegate any of its responsibilities to a subcommittee comprised of one or more members of the Human Resource and Compensation Committee, the Board or members of management.  As discussed in more detail below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company’s executive officers may attend Human Resource and Compensation Committee meetings to present data and analysis and to make recommendations regarding compensation, benefit plans and promotions for executive officers other than the President and CEO.  The Human Resource and Compensation Committee, on an annual basis, reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to CEO and other officer compensation, evaluates the performance of the CEO and the other executive officers in light of those goals and objectives, and determines and recommends compensation levels for the CEO and the other executive officers to the full Board of Directors based on this evaluation.

The Human Resource and Compensation Committee also has the authority to review and recommend to the full Board for approval director compensation, including board fees, committee fees and additional compensation, including awards of restricted stock and stock options.

In carrying out its duties, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee has the authority to retain, at the Company’s expense, to oversee the work of, and to terminate, a compensation consultant.  The Human Resource and Compensation Committee also has the authority to retain independent counsel and other advisors at the Company’s expense.  The Committee did not engage an independent compensation consultant or other advisor during 2017.  During 2016, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners, an executive compensation consultant specializing in community bank compensation plans, to provide advisory services regarding executive and director compensation.

15


The Committee reviews and re-approves, on an annual basis, its committee charter and the Company’s compensation philosophy, which is described in greater detail below.  The Committee also conducts an annual self-assessment to confirm the Committee’s satisfactory completion of its responsibilities under its committee charter. As a result of its 2017 self-assessment, the Committee concluded that it was meeting its objectives as set forth in its committee charter.Independent Director

 

The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Human Resource and Compensation Committee is an “independent director,” in accordance with applicable NYSE American listing requirements, including the heightened independence requirements applicable to compensation committee members.  The Board of Directors has adopted a Human Resource and Compensation Committee Charter, which is available in the Governance Documents section of the Company’s website at Age:www.evansbancorp.com,  which can be found under the “Corporate Overview” tab  54

 

Director Since:  2014

Committees:

Corporate Governance and Nominating, Committee:Human Resource and Compensation

 

David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr., Chairman

Thomas H. Waring, Jr.

Nora B. Sullivan

Jody L. Lomeo

John R. O’Brien

Michael A. Battle

 

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee met five times during fiscal 2017.  Its purpose is to assist the Board in developing and implementing corporate governance guidelines for the Company, and to provide oversight of the corporate governance affairs of the Company, including strategic planning.  It is also charged with the responsibility of identifying and recommending to the Board candidates for director nominees to be presented to the shareholders for their consideration at the Annual Meetings of Shareholders, and to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors.  The director nominees for the Annual Meeting were selected by a majority of the independent directors of the full Board.  The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is an "independent director," in accordance with applicable NYSE American listing requirements. The Board of Directors has adopted a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter, which is available in the Governance Documents section of the Company’s website at www.evansbancorp.comwhich can be found under the “Corporate Overview” tab.

Biographical Information

 

The Company's bylaws set out the procedure to be followed by shareholders desiring to nominate directors for consideration at an annual meeting of shareholders.  Under the Company's bylaws, shareholder director nominations must be submitted to the Secretary of the Company in writing not less than 14 days nor more than 50 days immediately preceding the date of the annual meeting.  If less than 21 days notice of the annual meeting is given to shareholders, nominations must be mailed or delivered to the Secretary of the Company not later than the close of business on the seventh day following the day on which the notice of meeting was mailed.  Such notification must contain the following information to the extent known by the notifying shareholder: (a) name and address of each proposed nominee; (b) the principal occupation of each proposed nominee; (c) the total number of shares of common stock of the Company that will be voted for each proposed nominee; (d) the name and residence address of the notifying shareholder; and (e) the number of shares of common stock of the Company owned by the notifying shareholder.  Candidates for nomination to the Board of Directors must meet criteria established from time to time by the Board of Directors or a duly authorized committee of the Board.  Additionally, the Company's bylaws require that, in order to serve asMr. Pfalzgrafhas been a director of the Company an individual must be less than 70 yearssince 2014. He has been a Managing Partner of age.  The Company’s bylaws provide thatRupp, Pfalzgraf LLC, a Director who obtainslaw firm specializing in private business enterprises ranging from closely-held family businesses to multi-national corporations, since April 2000. Mr. Pfalzgraf leads the age of seventy (70) years old during his or her term as a Director may remain in office through the expiration of his or her term.  Nominations not made in accordancefirm’s corporate practice group, working primarily with the bylaws of the Company may be disregarded by the presiding officer of the meeting, in his or her discretion,private business enterprises ranging from closely-held family businesses to multi-national corporations. He assists clients with all corporate needs including business formations, restructurings, mergers and upon his or her instruction, the inspectors of election may disregard all votes cast for each such nominee.  However, in the event that any such nominee is nominated by more than one shareholder, the nomination shall be honored,acquisitions, financing and all votes cast in favor of such nominee shall be counted if at least one nomination for that person complies with the provisions of the bylaws of the Company.investment, development, labor and employment issues, and commercial transactions.

 

16


The process whereby the Corporate GovernanceWe believe Mr. Pfalzgraf’s extensive legal and Nominating Committee identifies director candidates may include identificationbusiness experience makes him a valuable member of individuals well-known in the community in which the Company operates and individuals recommended to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee by current directors or officers who know those individuals through business or other professional relationships, as well as recommendations of individuals to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee by shareholders and customers.  The Company has not historically received director candidate recommendations from its shareholders.  However, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider qualified nominees recommended by shareholders, and there is no difference in the manner in which the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will evaluate director candidates recommended by shareholders, as opposed to director candidates presented for consideration to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee by directors, officers or otherwise.  The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, in conjunction with the CEO, maintain a list of potential director candidates based upon community reputation and contacts, record of accomplishment, and skill set.  Additionally, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews committee and Board assessments for competencies and needs and seeks to identify candidates that will assist in the continued development and enhancement of theour Board of Directors.  In its evaluation of prospective director candidates, the Corporate GovernanceDirectors, and Nominating Committee considers an individual's independence (as defined in the listing rules of the NYSE American),to serve as well as his or her skills and experience relative to the needs of the Company.  Director candidates meet personally with the membersa member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and are interviewed to determine their satisfactionthe Human Resource and Compensation Committee.

17


Directors Continuing in Office

  Nora B. Sullivan  

A person smiling for the camera

Description automatically generated with low confidence

Independent Director

Age:  66

Director Since:  2013

Committees:

Audit, Corporate Governance and Nominating,
Enterprise Risk
(Chair)

Biographical Information

Ms. Sullivan has been a director of the criteria referredCompany since 2013.  She is President of Sullivan Capital Partners, a financial services company providing investment banking and consulting services to above.  Althoughclosely-held private businesses. Ms. Sullivan focuses on strategic planning, mergers and acquisitions, and governance matters. Prior to founding Sullivan Capital Partners in 2004, she worked for Citigroup Private Bank from 2000 to 2004, providing wealth management and private equity services to high-net-worth clients.  From 1995 to 1999, Ms. Sullivan was Executive Vice President of Rand Capital Corporation, a publicly traded closed-end investment management company providing capital and managerial expertise to small and mid-size businesses.  She began her career in the Companylegal profession where she held various positions with significant legal responsibility and acquired a solid foundation in corporate related matters and business transactions.  She is currently and has no policy regarding diversity,been a member of the charterboard of thedirectors of several privately held businesses, working closely with fellow board members, management, and ownership on strategic planning initiatives, developing exit strategies and implementing sound governance practices.

We believe Ms. Sullivan’s unique combination of legal experience and financial services expertise qualifies her to serve on our Board of Directors and its Audit Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, provides that diversity is oneand to Chair our Enterprise Risk Committee.

18


Directors Continuing in Office

  Thomas H. Waring, Jr.  

A person wearing glasses

Description automatically generated with low confidence

Independent Director

Age:  66

Director Since:  1998

Committees:

Corporate Governance
and Nominating, Human Resource and Compensation

Biographical Information

Mr. Waring has been a director of the criteriaCompany since 1998. He is the Nominating Committee may consider when selecting individualssole and managing member of STW Southwest, LLC which employes Mr. Waring to recommend forprovide professional services to Note Advisors, LLC and GCW Risk and Benefit Solutions, LLC. Mr. Waring is a principal and co-owner of Note Advisors, LLC, a fee only independent registered investment advisory entity formed in August 2014 and registered with the SEC. Mr. Waring’s financial services experience and business consulting provides the Board membership, together with independence, sound judgment, skill, integrity, willingness to make the required time commitment,a deeper understanding of financial statementsthe products and knowledge of and experienceservices which the Company needs to provide in the Company’smarketplace to remain competitive, as well as the delivery of those products and its subsidiaries’ businesses,services. Mr. Waring frequently advises high net worth individuals, family business owners and the interplayclosely-held business owners. He is experienced in providing strategic planning and development advice, including designing and implementing executive and key employee benefits.

We believe that Mr. Waring’s qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors and as a candidate’s experience with the experience of other membersmember of the Board of Directors.  After working with the CEO to meet with and interview Ms.  Minkel  and Ms.  Orsi, theBoard’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recommended them for nomination to the Board.and Human Resource and Compensation Committee include his extensive sales and marketing experience with a financial services company, as well as his executive leadership and management experience.

 Lee C. Wortham  

A person in a suit

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATIONIndependent Director -

Chairman

 

Director Compensation Philosophy.Age:  The Company’s Director Compensation Program is designed to provide a compensation amount and structure that will attract and retain highly competent, skilled and engaged individuals for Board service.  Compensation is delivered in both cash and equity.  This split in compensation aligns director compensation with long term shareholder value and provides directors with an appropriate compensation for service.66

 

Director Fees.Since:  Each2011

Committees:

Audit, Corporate Governance
and Nominating, Enterprise Risk, Human Resource and Compensation

Biographical Information

Mr. Wortham has been a director of the Company also servessince 2011 and has served as Chairman since April 2018. He has been a Partner and COO at Barrantys LLC, a consultant and service provider to wealthy families and family offices, since 2007. Prior to his role with Barrantys, Mr. Wortham was an Executive Vice President of First Niagara Financial Group from 2005 to 2007, where his responsibilities included wealth management, risk management, and corporate marketing. From 1999 to 2005, he was the Executive Vice President of Global Private Client Services, Product Development, and Central Operations for The Bank of New York. Mr. Wortham held several positions at Chase Manhattan Bank and Chemical Bank (currently JP Morgan Chase & Co.) from 1985 to 1999, including leading the Global Private Bank’s activities in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa while based in London, England. He started his career at M&T Bank in retail banking from 1980 to 1985.

We believe Mr. Wortham’s extensive experience in the financial services industry makes him a valuable member of the Board of Directors of the Bank. Non-employee directors do not receive compensation for attending meetings of the Bank’s Board, but do receive committee meeting fees.  It is the policy of the Board that employee directors are not paid for their service on the Company's or the Bank's Board of Directors in addition to their regular employee compensation.

During fiscal 2017:

Non-employee directors were paid a retainer at the rate of $1,125 in cash, payable on a monthly basis, and $1,125 per month in shares of restricted stock payable as a lump sum grant equal to $13,500 at the February board meeting.  The number of shares of restricted stock awarded is calculated by dividing $13,500 by the closing price for a share of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE American on the date of grant.  In February 2017, each non-employee director, except for Mr. Lomeo, Mr. Sommer, and Ms. Henderson received a grant of 340 shares of restricted stock, at a grant date fair value of $39.70 per share, for service during 2017.   Mr. Lomeo and Mr. Sommer each received a grant of 260 shares of restricted stock, at a grant date fair value of $39.00 per share, equal to $10,140 for his service as a director beginning in April 2017 through December 2017. Ms. Henderson received a grant of 113 shares

17


of restricted stock, at a grant date fair value of $39.70 per share equal to $4,486 for her service as a director during 2017 prior to retirement as of March 31, 2017.  Each restricted stock grant vests 100% on the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to full acceleration of vesting upon an individual’s death, disability, retirement or involuntary termination in connection with a change in control of the Company.  Vesting of restricted stock grants is accelerated on a pro-rated basis upon the individual’s resignation. 

Non-employee directors were paid an annual cash retainer fee per committee as follows, with the fee paid over the course of the year in 12 equal monthly installments. In recognition of their heightened responsibilities, each committee chairperson is entitled to an increased annual retainer as described below.  Members of the Enterprise Risk Committee did not receive an annual retainer and instead were paid per meeting attended, as set forth below.

·

Audit Committee: Chairperson $5,800, Member $3,200

·

Human Resources and Compensation Committee: Chairperson $3,800, Member $2,600

·

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee: Chairperson $2,400, Member $1,600

·

Enterprise Risk Committee: Chairperson $600 per meeting, Member $400 per meeting

Non-employee directors received $400 for attendance at a strategic planning meeting held outside of normal monthly Board meetings and regular committee meetings.

In addition to the annual service fee described above and Board meeting fees, the individual serving as Chairman of the Company’sour Board of Directors, and its Audit, Corporate Governance and Nominating, Enterprise Risk, and Human Resource and Compensation Committees. His expertise has been valuable in helping the Bank’s Board of Directors is entitledevaluate the Company’s strategies to receive an annual fee of $40,000.  He or she does not receive committee meeting fees while servingdiversify its product offerings and revenue streams as Chairman.a growing and competitive financial institution.

19


Executive Officers

  John B. Connerton  

Picture 38

 

Age:In addition to the annual service fee described above and Board and committee meeting fees, the individual serving as Vice Chairman  57

Biographical Information

Mr. Connerton was appointed Treasurer of the Company’s BoardCompany and Chief Financial Officer of Directorsthe Bank on November 30, 2015. Prior to his appointment as Treasurer of the Company, he had served as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company between 2002 and 2010 and again between 2013 and 2015. He has also served as Executive Vice President and Treasurer of the Bank’s Board of Directors is entitledBank since 2010. Prior to receive an annual fee of $5,000.joining the Company, Mr. Connerton was a Senior Auditor specializing in auditing and consulting for banking, healthcare and manufacturing clients at Deloitte & Touche LLP.

 

18

 


 

Director Compensation.  The following table provides information with regard to the compensation paid to the Company's non-employee directors for their service during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($) (1)

 

Stock Awards
($) (2)(3)

 

Change in Pension Value and Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($) (4)

 

Total
($)

Michael A. Battle

 

15,763 

 

13,498 

 

-    

 

29,261 

James E. Biddle, Jr.

 

30,476 

 

13,498 

 

3,539 

 

47,513 

Marsha S. Henderson (5)

 

6,875 

 

4,486 

 

-    

 

11,361 

Jody L. Lomeo

 

11,456 

 

10,140 

 

-    

 

21,596 

John R. O'Brien (6)

 

53,500 

 

13,498 

 

-    

 

66,998 

David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr.

 

18,139 

 

13,498 

 

-    

 

31,637 

Michael J. Rogers

 

31,113 

 

13,498 

 

-    

 

44,611 

Oliver H. Sommer

 

19,250 

 

10,140 

 

-    

 

29,390 

Nora B. Sullivan

 

18,689 

 

13,498 

 

-    

 

32,187 

Thomas H. Waring, Jr.

 

19,239 

 

13,498 

 

397 

 

33,134 

Lee C. Wortham

 

33,802 

 

13,498 

 

-    

 

47,300 

  Kenneth D. Pawlak  

 

(1)Includes the aggregate amount of the cash retainer, plus all committee and/or chairmanship fees and meeting fees paid to each director for service in 2017.Picture 1

 

(2)Reflects the fair value of the awards at grant date, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for financial statement reporting purposes.  For additional information as to the assumptions made in valuation, see Note 12 to the financial statements filed with the SEC in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.  Amounts shown in the table are based on the Company’s accounting expense for these awards, and do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that may be realized by the directors.

(3)Age: The following reflects all equity awards granted to each director that were outstanding as of December 31, 2017:59



 

 

 

Name

 

Stock Awards (#)

Option Awards (#)

Michael A. Battle

 

340 

-

James E. Biddle, Jr.

 

340 

-

Jody L. Lomeo

 

260 

-

John R. O'Brien

 

340 

-

David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr.

 

340 

-

Michael J. Rogers

 

340 

-

Oliver H. Sommer

 

260 

-

Nora B. Sullivan

 

340 

-

Thomas H. Waring, Jr.

 

340 1,500 

Lee C. Wortham

 

340 

-

Mr.Lomeo’s and Mr. Sommer’s equity awards, which were granted in May 2017 upon commencement of their services as a director, have  a grant date fair value of $39.00.  All other equity awards granted to each director had a grant date fair value of $39.70.

(4) The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan whereby the directors may elect to defer 1% to 100% of their fees until retirement or termination of service.  The Company credits such deferrals at a rate determined at the beginning of each plan year equal to 1% over the prime rate as of each January 1st.  This column reflects amounts credited under the deferred compensation plan during 2017 at interest rates greater than 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate then in effect.  Only the above-market portion of interest credited to the participating directors’ accounts has been reported.

(5) Ms. Henderson retired as a director effective March 31, 2017.

(6) Mr. O’Brien announced his resignation as a director effective March 31, 2018.

 

 

19

 


 

Biographical Information

 

HUMAN RESOURCE AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKSMr. Pawlak was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Growth Officer of the Bank on February 6, 2023, and is currently responsible for leading the sales, relationship management, and marketing functions.  He joined the Company in 2017 as Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Banking Officer.  Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Pawlak served as Administrative Vice President, Credit Risk Manager – Business Banking at M&T Bank from 2014 until 2016.

AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

20


Corporate Governance

Independence of Directors

A  substantial majority of the Board of Directors, and all members of the Audit, Human Resource and Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees are independent, as affirmatively determined by the Board, consistent with the criteria established by NYSE American and as required by our bylaws.

The Board has conducted an annual review of director independence for all current nominees for election as directors and all continuing directors. During this review, the Board considered transactions and relationships during the prior year between each director or any member of his or her immediate family and the Company and its subsidiaries, affiliates and principal shareholders, including those of the type described below under “Transactions with Related Persons.” The Board also examined transactions and relationships between directors or their affiliates and members of senior management or their affiliates. The purpose of this review was to determine whether any such relationships or transactions were inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent.

As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that the nominees Dawn DePerrior, Kimberley A. Minkel, Christina P. Orsi, and Michael J. Rogers meet the Company’s standard of independence, as do the following continuing directors: Michael A. Battle, Robert A. James, Jody L. Lomeo, David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr., Nora B. Sullivan,  Thomas H. Waring, Jr., and Lee C. Wortham.  In addition, our retiring director Robert G. Miller, Jr and noncontinuing director Kevin D. Maroney meet the Company’s standard of independence. As an executive officer of the Company, David J. Nasca has been determined not to be independent.

Leadership Structure. Lee C. Wortham has served as Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors since April 2018. In his capacity as Chairman, Mr. Wortham chairs meetings of the Board and executive sessions of the Board, coordinates the activities of the other independent directors, and performs such other duties and responsibilities as the Board of Directors may determine. These duties also include chairing meetings of the Company’s shareholders, overseeing the preparation of agendas for meetings of the Board, keeping directors informed through the timely distribution of information and reports, maintaining contact with the Company’s CEO between meetings to stay current on developments and to determine when it may be appropriate to alert the Board to significant pending developments, serving as a liaison between independent directors and the CEO with respect to sensitive issues, and other matters.

The positions of Chairman and CEO have been separated since 2001. While the separation of these positions is not required by our bylaws, we believe that it is the most appropriate leadership structure for us at this time. We believe that it is advantageous to separate the two positions in order to provide for independent director control over the Board agenda and information flow, encourage open and lively communication between the independent directors and management, and to help balance the leadership of the Board.

Director Majority Voting Policy.    The Board believes that each director of the Company should have the confidence and support of the Company’s shareholders and, to this end, in January 2023, the Board unanimously adopted a majority voting policy for the election of directors in uncontested elections. For the purposes of this policy, an “uncontested election” means an election of directors where the only nominees are those individuals recommended by the Board.  Pursuant to the policy, in an uncontested election, any incumbent director nominee who receives a greater number of votes “WITHHELD” than votes cast “FOR” their election at a shareholder meeting shall promptly tender their resignation to the Board for consideration.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (excluding any member that has submitted their resignation) will consider the resignation and recommend to the Board whether to accept the resignation or take other action, including rejecting the resignation and addressing any apparent underlying causes of the failure of the director to obtain a majority of votes “FOR” their election. When considering the resignation and making its recommendation, the committee will consider all factors deemed relevant by its members including, without limitation, any underlying reasons for “WITHHELD” votes (to the extent ascertainable), the length of service and qualifications of the director, the director’s contributions to the Company, and whether the acceptance or rejection of the resignation will have any adverse effect on the Company’s compliance with any applicable law, rule, listing requirement, regulation or governing document. The Board will act on the committee’s recommendation no later than its next regularly scheduled meeting and will publicly disclose its decision with respect to the resignation. Any director who tenders their resignation will not participate in the committee’s or full Board’s deliberations and decision regarding the resignation. However, during the review period, any such director will remain a director of the Company and shall otherwise discharge their duties and responsibilities as director or committee member.

21


Corporate Governance

If a majority of the members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are required to tender a resignation at the same election, then the other independent directors of the Board will appoint a special Board committee solely for the purpose of considering the resignations and making a recommendation to the full Board.

Board of Directors Stock Ownership. Upon his or her first election or appointment to the Board of Directors, a new director must hold, or must obtain within 60 calendar days after such election or appointment, not less than $10,000 aggregate market value of the Company’s common stock, based on the trailing 365-day average price. A new director has a period of 5 years from the beginning of such director’s term of office to obtain the required $50,000 aggregate market value of the Company’s common stock. The value of a new director’s qualifying shares at the beginning of his or her term in office will be determined as of the date purchased or the date on which the individual becomes a director, whichever value is greater. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, all directors are in compliance with the Board of Directors stock ownership requirements. Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits directors, officers and employees from engaging in any hedging or monetization transactions involving Evans Bancorp securities.

Oversight of Risk Management.  Our Enterprise Risk Committee (“ERC”) is responsible for overseeing and approving company-wide risk management practices. See the discussion of the ERC committee’s roles and responsibilities under the Board of Director’s Committees section.

Compensation Risk. The Human Resource and Compensation Committee, along with the ERC, considers risk and its influence on the Company’s compensation programs. This Committee reviews each compensation element individually and in the aggregate to ensure that the overall compensation program provides a balanced perspective that ultimately aligns pay with performance while also ensuring bonus / incentive programs do not motivate inappropriate risk-taking. Equity award levels and practices are set to foster shared interests between management and shareholders, but are not considered by the Committee to be at levels that would drive inappropriate behavior. In the Committee’s judgment, the compensation policies and practices of the Company do not give rise to material risks.

In addition, the Company is subject to interagency guidance issued by the FDIC, the FRB and the OCC designed to ensure that incentive compensation arrangements at banking organizations appropriately tie rewards to longer-term performance and do not undermine the safety and soundness of the organizations or create undue risks to the financial system. This guidance embodies three core principles, which are: (1) incentive compensation arrangements at a banking organization should provide employees incentives that appropriately balance risk and financial results in a manner that does not encourage employees to expose their organizations to imprudent risks; (2) these arrangements should be compatible with effective controls and risk management, and (3) these arrangements should be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the organization’s board of directors. We believe that our incentive compensation program satisfies the principles of this guidance.

Policy for Director Attendance at Annual Meeting. It is the policy of the Company that all directors be present at the Annual Meeting, barring unforeseen or extenuating circumstances. All directors who were then serving were present at the Company’s 2023 Annual Meeting.

Shareholder Communications with the Board of Directors. Shareholders and other parties interested in communicating directly with the Company’s Board of Directors may do so by writing to the Evans Bancorp, Inc. Board of Directors, 6460 Main Street, Williamsville, NY 14221. All correspondence received under this process is compiled and summarized by the Corporate Secretary of the Company and presented to the Board of Directors, in accordance with our Policy for Communication to the Board of Directors. Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters are handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee, as set forth in our Employee Complaint Procedure for Accounting and Auditing Matters. Each of these policies is available in the Governance Documents section of the Company’s website (https://evansbancorp.q4ir.com), which can be found by clicking on “Governance”, then “Governance Documents”.

Code of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officers.  The Company has a “Chief Executive Officer/Treasurer/Controller Code of Ethics,” which is applicable to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer. The “Chief Executive Officer/Treasurer/ControllerCode of Ethics” is available in the Governance Documents section of the Company’s website (https://evansbancorp.q4ir.com), which can be found by clicking on “Governance”, then “Governance Documents”. The Company intends to post amendments to or waivers from its code of ethics at this location on its website.

22


Corporate Governance

Board Meetings and Attendance at Board of Director and Committee Meetings. The Company’s Board of Directors met nine times during fiscal 2023, including one strategic planning meeting. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of: (1) all meetings of the Company’s Board of Directors (held during the period for which he or she served as a director) and (2) all meetings held by the committees of the Company’s Board of Directors on which he or she served (during the periods that he or she served).

Availability of Committee Charters and Other Corporate Governance Documents. Current copies of the written charters for the Audit Committee, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, copies of the Company’s “Chief Executive Officer/Treasurer/Controller Code of Ethics” and the “Code of Conduct,” the “Policy for Communication to the Board of Directors,” and the “Employee Complaint Procedure for Accounting and Auditing Matters” are available in the Governance Documents section of the Company’s website (https://evansbancorp.q4ir.com), which can be found by clicking on “Governance”, then “Governance Documents”.

Board of Director Committees

The Company’s Board of Directors has four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee and the Enterprise Risk Committee. The members of each committee have been nominated by the Chairman of the Board of Directors and approved by the full Board. The names of the members of the Audit Committee, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Enterprise Risk Committee together with a brief description of their functions, are set forth below.

Audit Committee:

Michael J. Rogers, Chair

Nora B. Sullivan

Dawn DePerrior

Lee C. Wortham

Robert A. James

The Audit Committee met five times during fiscal 2023. The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing the financial information of the Company that will be provided to shareholders and others, overseeing the systems of internal controls which management and the Board of Directors have established, selecting and monitoring the performance of the Company’s independent auditors, and overseeing the Company’s audit and financial reporting processes. The Board of Directors has determined that Michael J. Rogers, Nora B. Sullivan and Lee C. Wortham each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K. Each member of the Audit Committee is an “independent director” in accordance with applicable NYSE American listing requirements, including the heightened independence requirements applicable to Audit Committee members, and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act. The Board of Directors has adopted an Audit Committee Charter, which is available in the Governance Documents section of the Company’s website at (https://evansbancorp.q4ir.com), which can be found by clicking on “Governance”, then “Governance Documents”.

Human Resource and Compensation Committee:

Jody L. Lomeo, Chair

David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr.

Robert A. James

Thomas H. Waring Jr.

Kimberley A. Minkel

Lee C. Wortham

Christina P. Orsi

23


The Human Resource and Compensation Committee met five times during fiscal 2023. The Human Resource and Compensation Committee is responsible for administering the Company’s 2019 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan and awarding new grants and performance measures thereunder, for administering the Evans Excels Performance Incentive

Board of Director Committees

Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Executive Severance Plan, the SERP Plans (defined below), the DeferredCompensation Plan, and the Executive Incentive Retirement Plan, for making such determinations and recommendations as the Human Resource and Compensation Committee deems necessary or appropriate regarding the remuneration and benefits of employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, and, in addition, for reviewing with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and providing a report recommending to the Board of Directors whether the Compensation Discussion and Analysis should be included in the Proxy Statement.

The Human Resource and Compensation Committee has the authority to act on behalf of the Board of Directors in setting compensation policy, administering Board or shareholder-approved compensation plans, approving benefit programs and making decisions for the Board with respect to compensation of senior management. Except as otherwise required by the applicable rules of the SEC or the NYSE American, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee may delegate any of its responsibilities to a subcommittee comprised of one or more members of the Human Resource and Compensation Committee, the Board or members of management. As discussed in more detail below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company’s executive officers may attend Human Resource and Compensation Committee meetings to present data and analysis and to make recommendations regarding compensation, benefit plans and promotions for executive officers other than the President and CEO. The Human Resource and Compensation Committee, on an annual basis, reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to CEO and other officer compensation, evaluates the performance of the CEO and the other executive officers in light of those goals and objectives, and determines and recommends compensation levels for the CEO and the other executive officers to the full Board of Directors based on this evaluation.

The Human Resource and Compensation Committee also has the authority to review and recommend to the full Board for approval director compensation, including board fees, committee fees and additional compensation, and awards of restricted stock.

In carrying out its duties, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee has the authority to retain, at the Company’s expense, to oversee the work of, and to terminate, a compensation consultant. The Human Resource and Compensation Committee also has the authority to retain independent counsel and other advisors at the Company’s expense. During 2023, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee engaged McLagan of Aon Plc (“McLagan”), an independent firm, for one engagement to analyze the Company’s salary, short-term and long-term incentive spend against peer bank information.  The details of this engagement are discussed within the Executive Compensation section of this document and include material elements of the instructions given to the compensation consultant, and its recommendations. 

The Human Resource and Compensation Committee reviews and re-approves, on an annual basis, its committee charter and the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, which is described in greater detail below. The Human Resource and Compensation Committee also conducts an annual self-assessment to confirm the Human Resource and Compensation Committee’s satisfactory completion of its responsibilities under its committee charter.

The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Human Resource and Compensation Committee is an “independent director,” in accordance with applicable NYSE American listing requirements, including the heightened independence requirements applicable to compensation committee members. The Board of Directors has adopted a Human Resource and Compensation Committee Charter, which is available on the Company’s website at (https://evansbancorp.q4ir.com), by clicking on “Governance”, then “Governance Documents”.

24


Board of Director Committees

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee:

Michael A. Battle, Chair 

Nora B. Sullivan

Jody L.  Lomeo 

Thomas H. Waring, Jr.

Christina P. Orsi

Lee C. Wortham

David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee met six times during fiscal 2023. Its purpose is to assist the Board in developing and implementing corporate governance guidelines for the Company, and to provide oversight of the corporate governance affairs of the Company, including strategic planning. It is also charged with the responsibility of identifying and recommending to the Board candidates for director nominees to be presented to the shareholders for their consideration at the Annual Meetings of Shareholders, and to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is an “independent director,” in accordance with applicable NYSE American listing requirements. The Board of Directors has adopted a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter, which is available in the Governance Documents section of the Company’s website at (https://evansbancorp.q4ir.com), which can be found by clicking on “Governance”, then “Governance Documents”.

The Company’s bylaws set out the procedure to be followed by shareholders desiring to nominate directors for consideration at an annual meeting of shareholders. Under the Company’s bylaws, shareholder director nominations must be submitted to the Secretary of the Company in writing not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders of the Corporation; provided, however, that if the date of the annual meeting is advanced or delayed more than 30 days from the anniversary date of the preceding year’s annual meeting, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be so delivered not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.  Such notification shall contain the following information: (a) name and address of each proposed nominee; (b) the principal occupation of each proposed nominee;  (c) the name and residence address of the notifying shareholder; (d) the number of shares of capital stock of the Corporation beneficially owned by the notifying shareholder and each nominee; and (e) any other information relating to each such nominee or the proposal that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including, but not limited to, information required to be disclosed by Items 4, 5, 6 and 7 of Schedule 14A to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (or any successors of such items or schedule). Nominations or other business not made in accordance herewith may, in his or her discretion, be disregarded by the presiding officer of the meeting, and upon his or her instruction, the vote tellers may disregard all votes cast for each such nominee.  In the event the same person is nominated by more than one shareholder, the nomination shall be honored, and all shares of capital stock of the Corporation shall be counted if at least one nomination for that person complies herewith. Candidates for nomination to the Board of Directors shall meet such criteria as may be established from time to time by the Board of Directors or a duly authorized committee thereof.    

The process whereby the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee identifies director candidates may include identification of individuals well-known in the community in which the Company operates and individuals recommended to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee by current directors or officers who know those individuals through business or other professional relationships, as well as recommendations of individuals to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee by shareholders and customers. The Company has not historically received director candidate recommendations from its shareholders. However, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider qualified nominees recommended by shareholders, and there is no difference in the manner in which the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will evaluate director candidates recommended by shareholders, as opposed to director candidates presented for consideration to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee by directors, officers or otherwise. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, in conjunction with the CEO, maintains a list of potential director candidates based upon community reputation and contacts, record of accomplishments, and skill

25


set. Additionally, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews committee and Board assessments for competencies and needs and seeks to identify candidates that will assist in the continued development and enhancement

Board of Director Committees

of the Board of Directors. In its evaluation of prospective director candidates, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers an individual’s independence (as defined in the listing rules of the NYSE American), as well as his or her skills and experience relative to the needs of the Company. Director candidates meet personally with the members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and are interviewed to determine their satisfaction of the criteria referred to above. Although the Company has no policy regarding diversity, the charter of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee provides that diversity is one of the criteria it may consider when selecting individuals to recommend for Board membership, together with independence, sound judgment, skill, integrity, willingness to make the required time commitment, understanding of financial statements and knowledge of and experience in the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ businesses, and the interplay of a candidate’s experience with the experience of other members of the Board of Directors. 

Enterprise Risk Committee:

Nora B. Sullivan, Chair

Kimberley A. Minkel

Michael A. Battle

David J. Nasca

Dawn DePerrior

Michael J. Rogers

Kevin D. Maroney

Lee C. Wortham

Robert G. Miller, Jr.

Consistent with guidance from our primary regulator, our Board delegated oversight of enterprise risk management to an Enterprise Risk Committee (“ERC”) comprised of nine Directors.  The ERC meets at least monthly throughout the year and reports its findings and observations to the full Board on an ongoing basis.  We also have a Risk and Controls Manager, who reports on matters involving enterprise risk to the ERC.

The ERC is responsible for overseeing and approving company-wide risk management practices throughout the Company, overseeing management’s risk assessment process and risk management infrastructure, reviewing management’s risk-management framework in the context of the Company’s size and business activities, and advising on risks that the Company may face. The ERC will review and discuss with management, at least annually, the Company’s risk governance structure and the Company’s risk management and risk assessment guidelines and policies regarding market, credit, operations, liquidity, funding, reputation, cybersecurity and franchise risk, and the Company’s risk tolerance. The ERC will review at least quarterly the major risk exposures of the Company and its business units against established risk management methodologies and targets. The Board’s role in the Company’s risk oversight process includes receiving reports, at least quarterly, from members of senior management on areas of material risk to the Company, including operational, financial, credit, liquidity, legal and regulatory, and strategic and reputational risks. The full Board (or the appropriate committee in the case of risks that are under the purview of a particular committee) receives these reports from the appropriate “risk owner” within the organization to enable it to understand our risk identification, risk management and risk mitigation strategies. When a committee receives the report, the chairman of the relevant committee reports on the discussion to the full Board during the committee reports portion of the next Board meeting. This enables the Board and its committees to coordinate the risk oversight role, particularly with respect to risk interrelationships. The Board’s role in the Company’s risk oversight process has not directly impacted its leadership structure.

Data Protection and Cybersecurity

Our Chief Information Security Officer (“CISO”) team has developed and implemented policies, procedures and controls throughout our organization that seeks data security, while allowing speed and flexibility for our customers and associates.  During 2023, we conducted numerous information security training programs for our associates, as well as targeted exercises to reinforce the importance of information security.  When appropriate, we educate our customers about emerging cyber security threats to prevent fraud or data loss.

26


The CISO team has established controls and standards consistent with National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”).  NIST is a unit of the U.S. Commerce Department that promotes and maintains measurement standards.  It also has active programs for encouraging and assisting industry and science to develop and use these standards.  Our cybersecurity environment is evaluated annually using the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council’s Cybersecurity Assessment Tool to assess our risk.    

27


Director Compensation

Director Compensation Philosophy. The Company’s director compensation program is designed to provide a compensation amount and structure that will attract and retain highly competent, skilled and engaged individuals for Board service. To ensure that its director compensation program remains competitive but appropriate, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee reviews director compensation, on an annual basis, against the same proxy peer group as that used in the review of executive compensation, as described below under “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The desired total director compensation is at the 50th percentile of the proxy peer group and is delivered in both cash and equity. The Human Resource and Compensation Committee believes that using a mix of cash and equity compensation aligns director compensation with long term shareholder value, while at the same time providing directors with an appropriate compensation for their service.

Director Fees. Each director of the Company also serves as a member of the Board of Directors of the Bank. Non-employee directors do not receive compensation for attending meetings of the Bank’s Board but do receive committee meeting fees. It is the policy of the Board that employee directors are not paid for their service on the Company’s or the Bank’s Board of Directors in addition to their regular employee compensation.

During fiscal 2023:

Non-employee directors were paid a retainer at the rate of $1,708 in cash, payable on a monthly basis, and $1,708 per month in shares of restricted stock payable as a lump sum grant equal to $20,500 at the January board meeting. The number of shares of restricted stock awarded is calculated by dividing $20,500 by the closing price for a share of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE American LLC on the date of grant. In January 2023, each non-employee director received a grant of 519 shares of restricted stock, at a grant date fair value of $39.52 per share, for service during 2023. Each restricted stock grant vests 100% on the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to full acceleration of vesting upon an individual’s death, disability, retirement or involuntary termination in connection with a change in control of the Company. Vesting of restricted stock grants is accelerated on a pro-rated basis upon the individual’s resignation.

Non-employee directors were paid an annual cash retainer fee per committee meeting as follows, with the fee paid over the course of the year in 12 equal monthly installments. In recognition of their heightened responsibilities, each committee chairperson is entitled to an annual retainer as described below. Members of the Enterprise Risk Committee did not receive an annual retainer and instead were paid per meeting attended, as set forth below.

Audit Committee: Chairperson $6,750, Member $3,750

Human Resources and Compensation Committee: Chairperson $4,750, Member $3,150

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee: Chairperson $3,350, Member $2,150

Enterprise Risk Committee: Chairperson $800 per meeting, Member $600 per meeting

Non-employee directors received $600 for attendance at a strategic planning meeting held outside of normal scheduled Board meetings and regular committee meetings.

In addition to the annual service fee described above and Board meeting fees, the individual serving as Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors and the Bank’s Board of Directors is entitled to receive an annual fee of $40,000. He or she does not receive committee meeting fees while serving as Chairman.

In addition to the annual service fee described above and Board and committee meeting fees, the individual serving as Vice Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors and the Bank’s Board of Directors is entitled to receive an annual fee of $10,000.

28


Director Compensation

Director Compensation. The following table provides information with regard to the compensation paid to the Company’s non-employee directors for their service during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.  Mr. Nasca, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Bank, is not paid any additional compensation for his service on the Board.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($) (1)

 

Stock Awards
($) (2)(3)

 

Change in Pension Value and Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($) (4)

 

Total
($)

Michael A. Battle

 

31,050

 

20,511

 

-    

 

51,561

Dawn DePerrior

 

21,567

 

13,684

 

-    

 

35,251

Robert A. James

 

18,867

 

13,684

 

-    

 

32,551

Jody L. Lomeo

 

28,000

 

20,511

 

-    

 

48,511

Kevin D. Maroney

 

27,700

 

20,511

 

-    

 

48,211

Robert G. Miller, Jr.

 

28,300

 

20,511

 

-    

 

48,811

Kimberley A. Minkel

 

31,450

 

20,511

 

-    

 

51,961

Christina P. Orsi

 

26,933

 

20,511

 

-    

 

47,444

David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr.

 

26,400

 

20,511

 

-    

 

46,911

Michael J. Rogers

 

46,250

 

20,511

 

-    

 

66,761

Nora B. Sullivan

 

37,000

 

20,511

 

-    

 

57,511

Thomas H. Waring, Jr.

 

26,400

 

20,511

 

829 

 

47,740

Lee C. Wortham

 

60,500

 

20,511

 

-    

 

81,011

(1)Includes the aggregate amount of the cash retainer, plus all committee and/or chairmanship fees and meeting fees paid to each director for service in 2023.  

(2)Reflects the fair value of the awards at grant date, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for financial statement reporting purposes. For additional information as to the assumptions made in valuation, see Note 14 to the financial statements filed with the SEC in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023. Amounts shown in the table are based on the Company’s accounting expense for these awards, and do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that may be realized by the directors.

(3)The following reflects all equity awards granted to each director that were outstanding as of December 31, 2023:  

02

Name

Stock Awards (#)

Michael A. Battle

519

Dawn DePerrior

548

Robert A. James

548

Jody L. Lomeo

519

Kevin D. Maroney

519

Robert G. Miller, Jr.

519

Kimberley A. Minkel

519

Christina P. Orsi

519

David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr.

519

Michael J. Rogers

519

Nora B. Sullivan

519

Thomas H. Waring, Jr.

519

Lee C. Wortham

519

Equity awards granted to each existing director at January 24, 2023 had a grant date fair value of $39.52.  The Equity awards granted to Dawn DePerrior and Robert A. James at May 9, 2023 had a grant date fair value of $24.97.

(4)The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan whereby the directors may elect to defer 1% to 100% of their fees until retirement or termination of service. The Company credits such deferrals at a rate determined at the beginning of each plan year equal to 1% over the prime rate as of each January 1st. This

29


column reflects amounts credited under the deferred compensation plan during 2023 at interest rates greater than 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate then in effect. Only the above-market portion of interest credited to the participating directors’ accounts has been reported.   

30


Evans Bank Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2023

As a community bank, Evans is embedded in the communities we serve. We know that being fully engaged in these efforts not only strengthens the network of nonprofit organizations serving our neighborhoods, but it also adds immeasurably to the career satisfaction of our associates. 

We take our position as one of the few locally headquartered community financial institutions in the region very seriously, as Western New York is where Evans Bank was founded over 100 years ago.

A group of people standing in front of a sign

Description automatically generated

Community Support

Evans continues to focus its support on the most disenfranchised areas of our communities:

·

The Bank completed its five-year $100,000 pledge to East Side Avenues, a public-private partnership which invests in neighborhoods and infrastructure to make lasting transformational change. Those investments have begun to bear fruit with exciting advances on several projects including the Michigan Street African-American Heritage Corridor, Central Terminal and the Broadway Market, which will benefit from more than $90 million in investments over the next three years.

·

The Adams Street Infill Housing Initiative, in which Evans collaborated with the City of Buffalo Office of Strategic Planning and the Buffalo Erie Niagara Land Improvement Corporation (BENLIC), is ready to break ground this spring. The revised plan will see the construction of twelve affordable homes adjacent to our Westminster Commons branch in East Buffalo. BENLIC has assumed the lead on the project, paving the way for subsidy support from the New York State Homes and Community Renewal’s Affordable Homeownership Opportunity Program (AHOP).

·

Evans is providing support and Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housing Program (AHP) sponsorship for the Build Promise Project to be developed across from St. Luke’s Mission of Mercy in East Buffalo. This $6.6 million project will provide resources and wraparound services to low-income women, men, and families in an area that has long been the epicenter of poverty and homelessness in Western New York. In addition, the new 22,500 square foot facility will provide shelter beds for homeless men year-round with additional shelter during Code Blue or other emergencies.

·

Evans continued its work with the Greater Rochester Housing Partnership in the City of Rochester’s innovative “Buy the Block” program. New, single-family, high-quality homes are being developed for qualified residents to purchase with affordable mortgages. There is an overall goal of building up to 100 new homes in under-invested areas of the city and assisting current homeowners in implementing home improvements through grants and free consultation, including roofing and exterior façade repairs. 

31


Corporate Social Responsibility

·

In recognition that more than 45% of people live below the poverty line in Buffalo and Erie County, and more than 12% of Erie County is food insecure, Evans contributed $20,000 to support FeedMore WNY’s capital campaign to build a 197,700 square-foot facility aimed at centralizing its regional operations and expanding its myriad food programs. FeedMore is the lead organization fighting hunger in our community. 

Evans Signature Philanthropic Program: Work/Life Solutions

In 2018, Evans Bank and the United Way of Buffalo & Erie County partnered to create Work/Life Solutions. This workforce persistence program was based on a national model which helps employees of participating companies deal with outside-of-work issues that distract them from their work or may even impede their ability to maintain a job.

Since its initial investment, Evans has contributed a total of $650,000 to the program, which provides resource referrals from dedicated resource coordinators, financial education, and a loan and savings program in which loans of up to $1,000 are repaid through payroll deduction, allowing borrowers to establish or improve credit and build savings. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has encouraged banks to offer small dollar loans, and Evans has been acknowledged for innovation and leadership in this area.

A record 178 loans were made in 2023, bringing the total of WLS loans made to date to 688. Over 150 borrowers have kept their savings accounts open and active after their loans were fully paid and have collectively saved over $80,000—funds that will have an impact on their ability to deal with future emergencies.

An analysis of the credit scores of those who have taken out multiple loans in the program revealed that, for some of these individuals and families, the loan has been a transformative financial advancement tool, allowing them to raise their credit scores as much as 150 points, gain access to mortgages and auto loans and significantly elevate their financial status, fully leverage their fee-free bank accounts at Evans, and wholly participate in the banking system rather than use check-cashers or payday lenders.  

Work/Life Solutions enjoyed enhanced visibility this year as it was recognized nationally during FINRA’s National “Financial Wellness at Work” Conference held in Buffalo in October.  Evans was also presented with the United Way “Forging Unlikely Partnerships” Award in recognition of our role in making this invaluable workforce training sustainability program possible.  

Community Reinvestment

The Bank is proud of its record of community reinvestment, including mortgage and small business lending, community development loans, investments, and service to our communities, with special attention on low- and moderate-income (LMI) neighborhoods. Products and services specifically created for this population were launched as detailed below. A $1.0 million investment was placed with nonprofit venture development organization Launch NY’s Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)-qualified fund supporting small businesses, and a $5 million CRA loan was closed in Rochester.

Sponsorships

Evans supports several non-profit organizations through sponsorships, including Darwin Martin House, Buffalo Urban League, area Chambers of Commerce and Rotary Clubs; children’s charities such as Make-A-Wish, Boys & Girls Clubs and Junior Achievement; and environmental causes including the Erie County Agricultural Society.

32


Corporate Social Responsibility

Evans sponsored an inaugural client and community celebration on the grounds of its headquarters at which over 20 clients/vendors and community partners were spotlighted. 

Volunteerism

Volunteer service is an invaluable tool in advancing communities and helping associates feel fulfilled and engaged with their neighbors.  Evans provides associates the opportunity to use paid time off to perform community service activities and in 2023, this amounted to nearly 5,000 hours of service.

Through our Community Commitment Team, Financial Fitness program and individual and team service hours, Evans associates have had a significant impact on the communities we serve.

A group of people posing for a photo

Description automatically generated

·

Community Commitment Team

The Evans Community Commitment Team made a positive impact on our neighbors in need by:

o

volunteering for a variety of organizations including Summit Center, Boys & Girls Club, Buffalo City Mission, Cradle Beach Camp and Bivona Child Advocacy Center.

o

raising funds for Hospice Buffalo, the Heart Association, the Breast Cancer Walk and the United Way of Buffalo & Erie County.

o

holding drives to collect personal care items for veterans, holiday gifts for needy children and teens, and baby items for expectant mothers.

o

overseeing our participation in the United Way Day of Caring, through which associates cleaned, painted, and distributed groceries and meals at three non-profit sites in the City of Buffalo.

o

organizing a third successful annual Westminster Commons Neighborhood Cleanup around our East Buffalo branch.

A group of people posing for a photo

Description automatically generated

33


·

Financial Fitness

Evans Bank’s Financial Fitness team, which is comprised of dozens of associates from across lines of business and support functions, facilitated 76 workshops on varying topics including Fraud Prevention, Savings Options, Budgeting, and Insurance for Business.  Over 50 of the workshops were conducted within an LMI census tract, with a total of 1,771 participants.

“Financial Fitness is the exact thing that all schools need to have! All students regardless of age need to be learning what you are here to teach because this will follow them forever.”  

Rochester Schools Teacher after Financial Fitness Program

Corporate Social Responsibility

As we move forward, we will continue to embrace service and approach it in a manner consistent with our philosophy by focusing on our associates, clients, and community.

Products and Services

The major metropolitan areas in our market, Buffalo and Rochester, both have poverty rates over 30%. As a financial institution, Evans has proactively sought to design and provide products and services that are responsive to the specific needs of these communities:

·

The Evans Affordable Mortgage is a mortgage product that offers underwriting flexibility, rate discounts, and closing cost assistance (lender credit) to qualified borrowers who meet specific income criteria.  Buyers may borrow up to 97% of the subject property’s value and are not obligated to obtain private mortgage insurance. A Homebuyer Counseling Certificate is required for first time homebuyer purchases and the product may be used for purchase, rate-term refinances, and rehab financing.

·

The Evans Neighborhood Mortgage offers underwriting flexibility and rate discounts, as well as closing cost assistance (lender credit) to qualified borrowers whose subject property is located within a low-and-moderate income census tract based on Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) target areas.  Borrowers are not obligated to obtain or bear the expense of private mortgage insurance, and this product may also be used for purchase, rate-term refinances, and rehab financing.

·

The Evans Ignite program which offers a .125% discounted rate and $500 credit towards application fee to community servants. 

·

A new Better Business Line of Credit scored product was introduced with added accessibility and ease of application. 

·

Retail Business Banking created a cash reserve (overdraft protection) product, and an innovative scored line of credit for businesses in low-and-moderate income census tracts.

·

A BankOn certified no-fee checking account product is geared toward bringing unbanked and underbanked members of the community into the financial mainstream.

·

Usage of Translation Services increased by 50% and included 10 languages as Western New York’s population reflects increasing numbers of refugees and immigrants.

Environmental Sustainability

Evans is committed to promoting environmental sustainability in our lending and philanthropy. Several of our large commercial and nonprofit projects involved the adaptive reuse of existing facilities. The Bank supported the new East

34


Buffalo headquarters for GoBike Buffalo, which promotes clean energy transportation options and sustainable job training for youth and has partnered with the Erie County Agricultural Society for decades. Our partnership with Buy the Block in Rochester is focused on making new affordable housing more energy-efficient to reduce both homeowner expenses and negative environmental impact.

Our Team

As of December 31, 2023, Evans employed 300 full-time employees. The average tenure of all full-time associates was approximately 6.3 years while the average tenure of executive officers was approximately 12.2 years.

Corporate Social Responsibility

We are committed to ensuring that an inclusive culture is a strategic priority. One of our strategic plan goals is building the preeminent community financial institution, admired for performance, culture, integrity and talent. Through these efforts, our associates have again certified Evans as a Great Place to Work® in 2023 with an 86% engagement score and 84% of associates saying they consistently feel a sense of belonging, which we measure as the rate of inclusion within our culture.

Associate Survey Highlights

·

96% believe that Evans is a physically safe place to work.

·

94% say that when you join the company, you are made to feel welcome.

·

92% feel management is honest and ethical in its business practices.

·

92% feel good about the way we contribute to the community.

A close up of a logo

Description automatically generated

Our Culture and Values

Evans Bank’s corporate culture has been a central pillar in our interactions with associates, clients, and the communities we have proudly served for over 100 years.

Our culture is designed to adhere to Evans’ values of integrity, valuing others, talent, passion, ownership and alignment, and customer focus. In keeping with those values, we expect our people to treat each other and our clients with the highest level of honesty and respect and go out of their way to do the right thing.

We dedicate resources to attract, develop and retain talented, diverse employees; promote an inclusive and safe workplace free of any form of discrimination or harassment; foster a culture of integrity, caring and excellence; and reward and recognize associates based on their individual results and performance, as well as that of their department and the Company overall. We seek to design careers that are fulfilling, with competitive compensation and benefits alongside a positive work-life balance. We also dedicate resources to fostering professional and personal growth with continuing education, on-the-job training, and development programs.

35


To create a benchmark measurement as to how Evans is living out its culture, a pulse survey was conducted, with 83% of associates stating they experience others exhibiting our Core Values on a consistent basis, and that they are experiencing our culture descriptors of belonging, agility, purpose, collaboration, influence, impact, and accountability on a frequent basis.

We are committed to attracting, retaining, and promoting top quality talent regardless of race, color, creed, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, marital status, military and protected veteran status, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information or predisposition or carrier status, those affected by domestic violence, and any other category protected by law.  We are dedicated to recognizing and respecting all the characteristics and differences that make each of our associates unique and add diverse perspectives that reflect all those we serve. 

Corporate Social Responsibility

Inclusion Diversity, Equity and Awareness (IDEA)

We re-emphasized our deep commitment to our Inclusive Strategic Plan to better empower Evans associates to further an inclusive culture.  We established an Employee Resource Group structure to further inclusion and belonging at Evans, including a Culture Ambassador initiative and enhanced alignment of our Advisory Council to advise on progress. Evans also reinforced its commitment to diversity by sponsorship and participation in events such as the Buffalo Juneteenth celebration, Pride events in Buffalo and Rochester, the Puerto Rican/Hispanic Day Parade, as well as the Tee It Up for the Troops fundraiser for veterans’ services. The Bank continues to expand its supplier diversity program which leverages Evans’ corporate vendor contracts to support women and minority owned businesses. 

A group of people standing in front of a table

Description automatically generated

“From the very beginning of my business, Evans helped me set up accounts, notarize documents and provide credit information to numerous vendor partners. Because of this comfort level, my husband and I also moved all our personal banking business to Evans.  As a vendor to Evans, I am always impressed by the team's creativity and openness to ideas that are sometimes outside the box.

Julie Waldron, Owner, Proforma,

Evans Client since 2007 and Supplier since 2011

Pay Parity

Evans continues to support an inclusive culture by maintaining pay parity across gender, race and ethnic backgrounds, ensuring associates in the same job grade are paid relative to one another. In 2023, a Retail title change project increased transparency and consistency among positions.

Careers and Development

36


Retention of talent is critical and ensuring that associates see an opportunity to advance within the organization is a key aspect of job satisfaction.  We respect and welcome the uniqueness of individuals and achieve our goals through the efforts of committed associates throughout our organization. Through our talent development and coaching environment, nearly one-fifth of our associates attained career advancement in 2023.

Two women standing next to a table

Description automatically generated

Outreach and Recruitment 

Our team realized a 13% increase in ethnic minority associates through concentrated recruitment efforts. Strategic community partnerships not only allow our associates to enjoy rewarding service experiences, but they also serve as recruitment opportunities as we live out the Evans culture. 

·

The Company partnered with Say Yes Buffalo as our first Say Yes / CareerWise Apprentice began with entry into our newly built Retail Career Path, as featured in the Buffalo Niagara Partnership’s Career Pathways Program.

·

The Employee Experience Team participated in job fairs hosted by WUFO radio station and Buffalo Employment Training Center (BETC) and presented at City Honors High School in Buffalo to discuss career readiness with students.  Partnerships were solidified with Native American Community Services, Jewish Family Services, Rochester Works, and the Rochester Urban League to advertise job opportunities and recruit diverse applicants.

Corporate Social Responsibility

·

Evans also began its participation in the WNY Women’s Foundation All-In Program, whose mission is to make Western New York a premier place for women and gender minorities to live, work, and lead by engaging the community in purposeful efforts to illuminate pathways to leadership and cultivate inclusion.

Associate Investment

Evans continues to contribute to the Western New York economy, providing employment to 300 individuals in Buffalo and Rochester. Our median salary is $63,000 with a comprehensive suite of employee benefits including health, dental, vision and life insurances, in addition to retirement planning vehicles. In 2023, the Evans student loan reimbursement program provided associates $42,531 in student loan interest savings and $30,450 in principal savings, for a combined total savings of $72,981.

Diversity in Governance and Management

Having diverse governance and management teams that represent the multifaceted perspectives of our community is of great importance to us.  We continue to build upon our 43% diverse representation among senior management and 50% within our Board of Directors. This year, two new directors--cybersecurity/IT professional and Rochester resident Dawn DePerrior and attorney/DEI expert Robert James--were elected to the Evans Bancorp, Inc. Board of Directors.

37


A group of people in suits

Description automatically generated

Associate Training

To ensure that all associates are free from harassment or discrimination on the basis of sex, gender or any other basis, Evans maintains a zero-tolerance policy regarding harassment or discriminatory conduct. Our Non-discrimination and Anti-harassment Policy prohibits harassment or discrimination by a supervisor, employee, client/customer, visitor, or representative of business with whom we interact. Evans provides annual training for all staff and informs each registered vendor of our commitment to anti-harassment, non-discrimination, and equal employment practices, as well as our commitment to diversity and inclusion. In addition, 100% of associates complete training to review our Code of Conduct Policy which details the ethical behavior the Company expects of every associate and Board Member.

Continuing Commitment

As we enter 2024, Evans remains committed to serving clients, associates, shareholders and communities and to ensuring that we are making a positive difference for all. 

38


Human Resource and Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation



The members of the Human Resource and Compensation Committee during 2023 were: Jody L. Lomeo (Chair), Robert A. James (from April 2023), Kimberley A. Minkel, Christina P. Orsi, David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr., Thomas H. Waring, Jr., and Lee C. Wortham. None of the members of the Human Resource and Compensation Committee was, during fiscal 2023 or previously, an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, and no member had a relationship requiring disclosure under “Transactions with Related Persons,” below.

During fiscal 2023, none of the Company’s executive officers served on the compensation committee (or equivalent) or on the board of directors of another entity with “interlocking” relationships requiring disclosure under applicable SEC rules.

39


Human Resource and Compensation
Committee Report

The information contained in this Human Resource and Compensation Committee Report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” or incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically requests that the information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.

The Human Resource and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.

Human Resource and Compensation Committee 

Jody L. Lomeo, Chair

David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr.

Robert A. James

Thomas H. Waring, Jr.

Kimberley A. Minkel

Lee C. Wortham

Christina P. Orsi

40


Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

Compensation
Discussion and Analysis

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

40 

Executive Compensation Philosophy

42 

Compensation Program Objectives and Overview

42 

Role of the Human Resource and Compensation Committee during 2017 were:  James E. Biddle, Jr., John R. O’Brien, David R. Pfalzgraf, Jr., Thomas H. Waring, Jr.,

42 

Role of Executive Officers

43 

Role of Compensation Consultants

43 

Benchmarking Analysis

44 

Compensation Recovery Policy

45 

Elements of Executive Total Compensation

45 

Employment Agreement

51 

Post-Termination Compensation

51 

Executive Severance Plan

52 

Tax and Lee C. Wortham.  NoneAccounting Considerations

52 

Say On Pay

52 

Risk Assessment

53 

Summary Compensation Table

53 

Grants of the members of the Human Resource and Compensation Committee was, during fiscal 2017 or previously, an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, and no member had a relationship during 2017 requiring disclosure under “Transactions With Related Persons,” below.Plan Based Awards

54 

 

During fiscal 2017, none of the Company's executive officers served on the compensation committee (or equivalent) or on the board of directors of another entityEmployment and Change in Control Agreements with “interlocking” relationships requiring disclosure under applicable SEC rules.our NEOs

  

HUMAN RESOURCE AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

 

The information contained in this Human Resource and Compensation Committee Report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” or incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically requests that the information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.

55 



The Human Resource and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the section of this Proxy Statement entitled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" with management.  Based on this review and discussion, the  Human Resource and Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the section entitled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

 

Human Resource and Compensation CommitteePay Versus Performance Table

 

63 

 

 

Thomas H. Waring, Jr., Chairman

David Pfalzgraf

John R. O’Brien

James E. Biddle, Jr. 

Lee C. Wortham

The following discussion provides an overview of the Company’s executive compensation program, including its philosophy and objectives, and the rationale for the Human Resources and Compensation Committee’s compensation decisions related to the following executives referred to in this discussion as “Named Executive Officers” (“NEOs”) for 2023:

 



20

 


 

  Name

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  

Compensation DiscussionTitle

David J. Nasca

President and Analysis.Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank

 

John B. Connerton

Treasurer of the Company and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Bank (principal financial officer)

Kenneth D. Pawlak

Executive Summary.Vice President and Chief Growth Officer of the Bank

Executive Summary

The Company’s performance during 2023 was characterized by resiliency. The Evans team was able to protect and serve client relationships and maintain funding and liquidity while battling interest rate pressure and macro-economic factors such as inflation.  During 2023, the Company benefited from continued commercial loan growth, and the execution of a strategic sale of The Evans Agency, providing a significant gain and return of capital to flexibly deploy back into the core banking business.

41


2023 Performance Financial Highlights



Financial Performance.  The Company delivered strong financial performance and growth in 2017, including the following highlights:

 

Picture 1

Picture 1

Picture 1

Picture 1

Net income Average Return on Stockholders Equity Diluted Earnings Per Share Cash Dividends paid

Strategic Highlights

A picture containing text, clipart

Description automatically generated

COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL LENDING

·

The Bank successfully delivered commercial real estate loan and residential mortgage originations of $179 million and $44 million, respectively, during 2023.

Icon

Description automatically generated

EVANS INSURANCE AGENCY

The Company achieved net income in 2017 of $10.5 million,realized a 27%  increasesignificant gain from $8.3 million in net income in 2016.  By comparison, the average increase in net incomesale of the 2017 Proxy Peer Group (defined below) was 0.4%. Insurance Agency, after increasing value over two decades from building and servicing a significant portfolio.



Return on average equity was 9.11% in 2017 compared with 9.02% for the 2017 Proxy Peer Group.

 

Loans grew 13%, or $123 million, to $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2017 compared with 13.7% growth for the 2017 Proxy Peer Group.Icon

Description automatically generated

TECHNOLOGY EVOLUTION

The Company experienced strong year-over-year deposit growth across all product categories.  Total deposits increased 12% to $1.1 billion compared with 9.5%  growth for 2017 Proxy Peer Group.

Executive Compensation Philosophy.

The Company seeks to align the interests of its executive officers, including the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table below (the “NEOs”) with the interests of its shareholders.  The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to complement the Company’s strategic plan objectives and to reward executives for performance as measured against short-term goals, long-term sustained results to the Company’s shareholders, and the Company’s core values.  The Company continues to design and monitor its compensation programs to further ensure that those programs are aligned with these objectives and to reflect emerging best practices.

In addition, the Company continuesAligned to focus on rewarding NEOsadvancing customer experience, operational efficiency and scalability

Leverage robotic process and workflow automation and evaluate opportunities to partner with financial technology providers as part of our overall digital transformation strategy

Goal to deliver strong and stable IT support for achievement of short-termBank growth

A black and white logo

Description automatically generated with low confidence

FOCUS ON TALENT

Talent and long-term strategicculture are true differentiators for Evans and operational goalskey determinants for our success

Learning and increased shareholder return,development efforts, combined with consistent company and manager-led communication and programs, and focus on team empowerment and diversity

Concentrated heavily on preparing our team for the continuously changing environment and future technology enhancements

Icon

Description automatically generated

COMMUNITY

This past year the Bank completed its five-year $100,000 pledge to East Side Avenues, a public-private partnership which invests in neighborhoods and infrastructure to make lasting transformational change. In addition, Evans contributed $20,000 to support FeedMore WNY’s capital campaign.

Continue to support community projects and contribute our resources and business expertise to programs and entities that enrich our community

42


Executive Compensation

Executive Compensation Philosophy

The Company seeks to align the interests of its NEOs with the interests of its shareholders. The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to reflect and further the Company’s Strategic Plan objectives and reward executives for performance as measured against short-term goals, long-term sustained results to the Company’s shareholders, and the Company’s core values. The Company continues to design and monitor its compensation programs to further ensure that those programs are aligned with these objectives and reflect emerging best practices while at the same time avoiding the encouragement of excessive or unnecessary risk taking.

Key features of the Company’s executive compensation program are:

A substantial percentage of short-term and long-term incentive compensation is tied to key corporate and individual performance goals established by the Human Resource and Compensation Committee to align the interests of NEOs with those of the Company’s shareholders.

Compensation criteria are structured so that achievement of corporate and individual goals does not encourage excessive risk-taking through the use of guardrails, which provide a top and bottom metric to monitor performance, and a mix of performance metrics, which reduce the risk associated with any single performance metric.

Performance-based compensation paid to our executive officers is subject to a “clawback” policy, providing for the return of incentive compensation in the event of a restatement of our financial statements due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement.

No tax “gross-ups” resulting from, but not limited to, a change in control, are provided in any employment or other agreement with our NEOs.

Limited perquisites and personal benefits which are in place only when supporting a demonstrated business purpose. No excessive perquisites are provided to NEOs.

Change in control provisions in the Company’s and the Bank’s employment agreement and change in control agreements with its NEOs provide for payment of severance benefits only upon termination of employment without cause or voluntarily resignation due to job diminishment in connection with a change in control (a so-called “double-trigger” event).

Except for certain corporate transactions described in section 4.4 of the 2019 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, and reductions of the exercise price of a stock option approved by the Company’s shareholders, neither the Committee nor the Board have the right or authority to make any adjustment or amendment that reduces or would have the effect of reducing the exercise price of a stock option granted under the Plan.

Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits directors and executive officers, including NEOs, from engaging in any hedging or monetization transactions involving the Company’s securities.

Compensation Program Objectives and Overview. The objective of the Company’s executive compensation programs is to attract, develop and retain executive officers capable of effectively leading the Company and maximizing performance for the benefit of the Company’s stakeholders.

Role of the Human Resource and Compensation Committee. The Committee is composed solely of independent directors of the Company. It is responsible for all policies, practices and governance related to director and executive compensation and oversees the executive compensation program for our NEOs. As part of this responsibility, the Committee, on an annual basis, reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to executive compensation, and reviews and evaluates the performance of each of the senior executive officers, including the NEOs, in respect to those goals and objectives.  Compensation for the NEOs is reviewed and approved by the Committee during the first quarter of each year based on performance during the prior year and review of peer group comparative information. Base salary is reviewed a second time, typically during the third fiscal quarter, to determine whether an individual’s performance merits a further increase, or to address other competitive changes that occur later in the fiscal year. The Committee administers, and makes grants under, the Company’s equity incentive plans. The Committee meets at least quarterly.

43


Executive Compensation

The decisions made regarding senior executive compensation, including NEO compensation, are based primarily upon the Committee’s assessment of each executive’s leadership and operational performance, and his or her potential to contribute to the long-term success and sound operation of the Company and to enhance long-term shareholder value. While the Committee establishes objective performance measures, such as those under the cash bonus incentive plan, it primarily makes subjective assessments of each individual’s performance, rather than solely utilizing rigid formulas or short-term changes in business performance, to determine the amount and mix of compensation elements and whether each particular payment or award provides an appropriate incentive and reward for performance sustaining and enhancing long-term shareholder value. Key factors affecting the Committee’s subjective assessment of performance include the executive’s performance compared to the financial, leadership, culture, operational, and strategic goals established by the Board of Directors at the beginning of each fiscal year; contribution to the Company’s financial results, particularly with respect to key metrics such as asset growth, disciplined investment; and organizational excellence to increase shareholder value. Additionally, the Committee assesses each executive’s presence in and commitment to the community.

Role of Executive Officers.  Although the Committee is ultimately responsible for designing our executive compensation program, input from the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) is critical in ensuring the Committee has appropriate information to make informed decisions.In particular, the CEO attends committee meetings to present data and analysis and to formulate recommendations regarding compensation for executive officers, benefit plans, and promotions. The CEO does not attend portions of Committee meetings during which the performance of the CEO is being evaluated or the compensation of the CEO is being determined.

Role of Compensation Consultant. Periodically, the Committee engages a compensation consultant to review the Company’s compensation programs and provide recommendations. During 2023, the Committee retained Aon McLagan to provide insight on industry compensation trends, including with respect to the cash bonus incentive plan, events within the banking industry during the first two quarters of the year with respect to rising interest rates, and industry compensation trends with respect to the treatment of significant, strategic one-time events impacting net income.

The Committee considered the independence of Aon McLagan in light of SEC rules and New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards, and received a report from Aon McLagan addressing the independence of the firm and its consultants, which included the following factors: (1) that no other services were provided to the Company; (2) fees paid by the Company as a percentage of the firm’s total revenue; (3) policies or procedures maintained by the firm that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (4) that there were no business or personal relationships between the firm and its consultants and any member of the Committee; (5) any company stock owned by the firm and its consultants; and (6) that there were no business or personal relationships between the Company’s executive officers and the firm and its consultants. The Committee discussed these considerations and concluded that the work performed by Aon McLagan and its consultants involved in the engagement did not raise any conflict of interest and concluded that they were independent Compensation Committee consultants.

44


Executive Compensation

Benchmark Analysis. The base salaries, short-term and long-term incentives provided to the NEOs are compared to a “benchmark” established using relevant industry compensation surveys and compensation information derived from proxy statements filed by other publicly held companies in the banking industry. The Committee considers the compensation data and financial performance of the financial institutions included in those surveys and filings. For this analysis, the Committee also considers data from its proxy peer group. The 2023 Proxy Peer Group was compiled after the Committee reviewed the recommendations by the compensation consultant in 2020. The Committee concluded to include financial institutions with assets ranging from approximately 50% to 200% of the Company’s asset size, with return on assets, return on average equity and earnings per share similar to or better than the Company’s. The Committee also strived to include peers that had a comparable customer composition and geography. Based upon the Committee’s review and discussion, the 2023 Proxy Peer Group consists of 22 companies with no changes from the prior 3 years. The 2023 Proxy Peer Group is as follows:  

1st Constitutional Bancorp

FNCB Bancorp, Inc.

Orrstown Financial Services

Chemung Financial Corp.

Greene County Bancorp, Inc.

QNB Corp.

ChoiceOne Financial Services

LCNB Corp.

People Financial Services

Cordorus Valley Bancorp, Inc.

Level One Bancorp, Inc.

Pioneer Bancorp

Enterprise Bancorp, Inc.

Macatawa Bank Corp.

Unity Bancorp, Inc.

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.

Western New England Bancorp

Farmers & Merchants Bancorp

Farmers National Banc. Corp.

NorthWest Indiana Bancorp

First Savings Financial Group

Old Second Bancorp, Inc.

The Committee also reviewed industry compensation data published by Aon McLagan, by both asset size and geographic region. While the 2023 Proxy Peer Group reflected financial institutions that are the most similarly situated to the Company, the Committee believes that it is useful to examine the “best practices” of a broader group of companies, and that multiple sources of compensation data assist the Company in designing payprograms that are both contemporary and relevant. The Aon McLagan compensation survey report for 2023 consisted of thirty (30) financial institutions in economic regions in the United States similar to the Company’s and also segregated by asset size between $1 billion to $4 billion.

45


Executive Compensation

Compensation Recovery Policy. The Company’s Incentive Plan Clawback Policy was revised in 2023 to comply with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)’s final rule and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) American LLC listing standards. The policy provides for the recovery of certain incentive compensation in the event of an accounting restatement and was adopted as a supplement to any other clawback policies or provisions in effect now or in the future at the Company. The amount of incentive-based compensation subject to the policy is the amount of incentive-based compensation received that exceeds the amount of the incentive-based compensation that otherwise would have been received had it been determined based on the restated amounts in the Company’s financial statements without regard to any taxes paid.

Elements of Executive Total Compensation. The following discussion describes the key elements of the Company’s NEO compensation program and the actions taken with respect to each element for 2023. The Committee reviewed the various elements of executive compensation provided by the Company during 2023 with a view toward aligning executive interests with those of the Company’s shareholders and the long-term interests of the Company. The Committee determines the allocation of compensation among base salary, and short-term and long-term incentives by reviewing data from the Company’s Proxy Peer Group (described above), as well as using salary surveys and review of industry trends. The elements of the Company’s NEO compensation program include the following:

 Compensation

 Element

Description or Purpose

Fixed/

Performance-Based

Short-Long-Term

Base Salary

Attract and retain executives

Fixed

Short-Term

Annual Cash Incentives

Drive performance achievement and create shareholder value

Performance-Based

Short-Term

Equity Incentives

Aligns interests with shareholders and serves as a retention tool through multi-year vesting

Performance-Based

Long-Term

Benefits

Supplemental Retirement and Defined Contribution Plan

Fixed

Long-Term

Other Compensation

Retirement plans and health and welfare benefits on the same time avoidingbasis as other employees. Limited perquisites.

Fixed

Short- and Long- Term

1.       Base Salary. Base salary is determined by individual factors, such as the employee’s role in the organization, scope and complexity of responsibility of the position, the market value of his or her job, the level of an individual’s expertise in the role and his or her performance in the position, as well as Company performance factors, such as Company financial performance, including earnings per share and growth in net income. Annual individual performance is measured for the CEO through a formal annual review by the Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Chairman of the Human Resource and Compensation Committee.  Their review and recommendations are then shared and discussed with the full board (absent the CEO) prior to making a final determination. For other NEOs, individual performance is reviewed monthly with the CEO. During these monthly meetings, any performance concerns are shared with the executive, and corrective measures (if needed) are outlined. Based on these monthly meetings and the CEO’s evaluation of each individual’s performance, the CEO makes recommendations to the Committee regarding annual adjustments to base salary for each of the other NEOs. In determining base salary, the Committee also considers the level of achievement of corporate strategic and operational objectives established by the Committee as described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Role of the Human Resource and Compensation Committee.” The Committee also utilizes the compensation surveys and the Proxy Peer Group data as sources of information in determining base salary for Messrs. Nasca and Connerton. The Committee generally targets the 50th to the 75th percentile of the Proxy Peer Group for the base salary of Messrs. Nasca and Connerton.  The base salary of Mr. Pawlak is compared to data from the salary surveys, but not to Proxy Peer Group data due to a lack of comparable data for his position. As a result, Mr. Pawlak’s compensation was generally determined based upon individual performance as compared to annual goals, including the achievement of corporate strategic and operational objectives. For Messrs. Nasca and Connerton, the Committee uses the survey and peer group data as a point of reference and comparison only, for purposes of establishing certain target percentiles, but does not use the data to set a specific level of compensation to be achieved.

46


Executive Compensation

For 2023, the Committee approved the following base salary for the NEOs:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Name

  

2023 Salary

 

  

2022 Salary

 

  

% Change

 

 

 

 

 

David J. Nasca

  

$

583,500 

 

 

$

566,500 

 

 

 

3.0 

 

 

 

 

John B. Connerton

  

$

275,000 

 

 

$

266,590

 

 

 

3.2 

 

 

 

 

Kenneth D. Pawlak

  

$

270,000 

 

 

$

245,000 

 

 

 

                 10.2%

 

Mr. Nasca’s salary increase was in relation to his contributions in enterprise leadership, delivering the goals of the Strategic Plan, financial performance of the Company, and appropriate scaling of the business for continued growth. Mr. Connerton’s salary was increased in recognition of his leadership in balance sheet management, company financial performance and overall finance team performance. Mr. Pawlak’s salary increase reflects his leadership in all Company efforts related to growing customers and relationships in addition to effective leadership of the Commercial Banking division and overall company financial performance. The 2023 base salary for Messrs. Nasca, Connerton and Pawlak was 108%, 98% and 83%, respectively, of the weighted average base salary at the 50th percentile, as reported in the 2023 compensation surveys, and 2023 Proxy Peer Group data for Messrs. Nasca and Connerton, utilized by the Committee as described above.

2.Annual Cash Incentive Compensation. The Company’s Excels Performance Incentive Plan (“the Company’s Excels Plan”) is a short-term (annual) cash incentive compensation plan intended to reward performance of officers of the Bank, including the NEOs. The plan is designed to motivate employees to attain desired objectives and to encourage teamwork and collaboration while aligning compensation with overall Company performance. The plan is a key element of the total compensation provided to the NEOs and allows the Company to remain competitive with the market by providing an opportunity for the NEOs to receive significant cash incentives. The design of the plan is intended to ensure that benefits paid to NEOs and other officers are in alignment with both the Company’s strategic plan and the achievement of individual performance goals. The award opportunities are linked to specific target and range of performance results for multiple performance measures and are calculated as a percentage of base salary in effect on the last day of the calendar during the relevant performance period, which runs from January 1st to December 31st. The Company typically makes payments in February of the year immediately following the end of the annual performance period. The following table illustrates the cash incentive opportunity for 2023 that would be payable to each of our NEOs if all individual goals were met at the specified level of performance (assuming no Committee discretionary override).



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Annual Cash Incentive as a % of Base Salary

 

 

 

 

  NEO

  

Threshold

 

Target

 

Stretch

 

 

 

 

David J. Nasca

  

 

 

23.63 

%

 

 

 

33.75 

%

 

 

 

43.88 

%

 

 

 

 

John B. Connerton

  

 

 

18.90 

%

 

 

 

27.00 

%

 

 

 

35.10 

%

 

 

 

 

Kenneth D. Pawlak

  

 

 

18.90 

%

 

 

 

27.00 

%

 

 

 

35.10 

%

The Committee determined these percentages by reviewing proxy peer group and compensation survey data and by aligning incentive levels with the goals of the Company’s Strategic Plan.  In consultation with Aon McLagan, the Committee decided to (1) reduce the annual cash incentive target level by 10% of the 2018 – 2021 short term incentive plan levels and (2) adjust threshold and stretch levels -/+ 30% from the target level instead of the prior plans having threshold and target 50% from target.  These incentive payment level changes were made to better manage Company expenses while remaining competitive and appropriate when compared to industry peers.

47


Executive Compensation

In consultation with Aon McLagan when reviewing industry short term incentive plan design, the Committee adjusted the plan for the 2024 plan year.  Going forward, if the Company’s net income is not attained at a minimum of the threshold level, the (i) net income goal achievement will be 0%, reducing the total incentive payout by 40% - 50% respectively, for each participant; and (ii) the remaining performance goals will not have performance surpassing the target level even if a stretch level for any goal was achieved.

For 2023, the Committee utilized the Company’s annual adjusted net income, on a consolidated basis, as the performance metric for determining the Company’s performance under the Evans Excels Plan for Messrs. Nasca, Connerton and Pawlak. The Committee selected adjusted net income as a performance metric since the Committee believes it provides a reasonable balance between shareholder value and appropriate employee motivation and

reward. Adjusted net income is a non-GAAP financial measure and is defined as net income (GAAP) as reported in the Company’s financial statements excluding the short-term cash incentive payment, which is calculated net of any tax impact associated with the short-term cash incentive payment. The goals set for 2023 and the actual results, as derived from GAAP net income, were as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Stretch

 

Actual



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income (GAAP)

 

$

23,597,611 

 

$

24,541,515 

 

$

26,995,667 

 

$

24,523,535 

Evans Excels Plan payments

 

 

2,321,775 

 

 

3,316,821 

 

 

4,311,867 

 

 

2,638,204 

Tax Effect

 

 

(603,661)

 

 

(862,373)

 

 

(1,121,085)

 

 

(685,933)

Adjusted Net Income

 

$

25,315,725 

 

$

26,995,963 

 

$

30,186,449 

 

$

26,475,806 

The Committee sets both Company and individual NEO goals each year in reviewing the Board-approved Strategic Plan and aligns Board-approved business targets and associated desired metric results within the calendar year. The Company performance goals for each fiscal year are set in the fourth quarter of the year prior to the annual performance period, and individual performance goals are set in the first quarter of the relevant annual performance period.

The individual performance measures established by the Committee are a combination of financial and operational goals derived from the Company’s Strategic Plan objectives. Each corporate and individual performance measure receives a weighting, which represents its relative importance to the achievement of the particular goals in the Company’s Strategic Plan, and the NEO’s ability to influence these goals. For each individual performance measure, the Committee establishes a “target”, “threshold” and “stretch” standard.

The table below shows the performance measures and relative weightings of the various performance measures utilized for each NEO for 2023. A performance measure requiring an NEO to deliver on a specified Strategic Plan goal will be broken down into several specific goals/action items, and whether the NEO achieves that goal at threshold, target or stretch level (or not at all) will be determined by the Committee based on the extent to which the NEO achieved meaningful results toward those specific goals/action items. Under the terms of the Evans Excels Plan, an individual must be employed by the Company on the payment date to receive payment thereunder.

The Evans Excels Plan allows the Committee to eliminate, adjust or grant an NEO’s incentive payout regardless of the individual or Company performance.  Net income exceeded target performance for 2023 as a result of diligent performance efforts by associates and management throughout the year, and the execution of several non-operating initiatives including the strategic sale of The Evans Agency which provided a significant gain and return of capital to flexibly deploy back into the core banking business. The Committee determined it was appropriate to include the results of these non-operating initiatives in incentive calculation due to the enhancement of long-term returns for the Company.

48


Executive Compensation

NEO

Performance Measure

Weight

2023 Performance
Rating

Adjusted Net Income

50%

Achieved at Target

Strategic Plan Execution

20%

Achieved at Target

Leadership & Development

10%

Achieved at Target

Culture & Talent

10%

Achieved at Target

Business Cultivation, Investor Relations, Strategic Partnerships

10%

Achieved at Stretch

Adjusted Net Income

40%

Achieved at Target

Strategy

20%

Achieved at Target

Operational Effectiveness

20%

Achieved at Target

Culture & Talent

10%

Achieved at Target

Leadership, Execution, Talent Development, Succession Planning, Investor Relations, Strategic Divestiture

10%

Achieved at Stretch

Adjusted Net Income

40%

Achieved at Target

Strategy

20%

Achieved at Threshold

Customer Centricity

15%

Not Achieved

Culture & Talent

15%

Achieved at Target

Leadership, Execution, Talent Development, Succession Planning, Commercial Efficiency, Customer Experience

10%

Achieved at Target

49


Executive Compensation

The total short-term incentiveachievement level for each NEO in the 2023 plan year is listed in the table below

  NEO

Total Short Term Incentive Award

as Percentage of Base Salary

David J. Nasca

34.78%

John B. Connerton

27.81%

Kenneth D. Pawlak

21.33%

The amounts paid under the plan to each NEO for 2023 are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table that follows this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

3. Equity Incentives. The Company’s shareholder-approved 2019 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (the “2019 Equity Plan”) is designed to provide key employees with a reward opportunity that aligns the interests of the participants with those of the Company’s shareholders by focusing on our Company’s performance over a longer period of time. The types of awards granted under the 2019 Equity Plan include restricted stock units and restricted stock awards. The 2019 Equity Plan both links the size of awards granted to the NEOs to the past performance of the Company and ties the ultimate realizable value of those awards to the future value of the Company’s common stock, thereby aligning the NEOs’ interests with those of the Company’s shareholders, encouraging a balance between growth and prudent risk-taking.

A consistent approach to granting equity on an annual basis exists with grant guidelines and a formal award structure, providing a framework for annual decisions surrounding long term incentive (LTI) awards.  The LTI awards align with Company performance, enhance consistency with market practices and allow for efficiency and simplicity of administration.  The LTI awards incorporate both time- and performance- vest shares with the total award value split across two weighted categories at the time of grant for the NEO participants.  Each participant’s award value is defined as a percentage of salary through a tiered structure shown below.

-

Tier 1, CEO, Target Award Level % of Salary: 30%

-

Tier 2, Executive Vice President, Target Award Level % of Salary: 25%

-

Tier 3, Senior Vice President, Target Award Level % of Salary: 20%

The LTI awards include restricted stock units which have a retentive effect because they vest over a period of time, typically three years from the date of grant. Vesting of the outstanding restricted stock units may be accelerated under certain circumstances, such as the executive’s death, disability or retirement, or if an executive’s employment is terminated in connection with a change in control of the Company. Holders of restricted stock units do not receive dividends if and when dividends are paid on the Company’s common stock during the restrictive period, and do not have voting rights during the restriction period.

The Committee may also grant awards of stock appreciation rights, stock options and restricted stock awards under the 2019 Equity Plan, but it has not historically granted stock appreciation rights and ended the practice of granting stock options and restricted stock awards to NEOs in 2021. Restricted stock awards remain an incentive program for high performing, non-executive leaders within the company.

The Committee believes that the Evans Excels Plan and 2019 Equity Plan together create an appropriate balance between short-term and long-term performance goals and encourage appropriate risk-taking.

The Committee exercises its discretion in determining when to grant equity incentive awards, as well as the size and nature of the awards. Equity awards are typically granted on an annual basis, during the first quarter of the fiscal year, for a forward-looking incentive program with performance and metric-based elements. But may under certain circumstances be granted at other times during the year, for example, in connection with a new hire or a change in position within the Company. Specifically, the Committee reviews the performance of the Company, the number of

50


shares remaining available for issuance under the plan, the market price for the Company’s common stock, and forward-looking performance goals.

Executive Compensation

The Committee awarded an equity grant to executive officers in March 2023. A target award opportunity was defined as a percentage of salary through a tiered structure based on title.  Formal forward-looking performance-based criteria was incorporated while also allowing for some discretion. Both time- and performance- vested shares were utilized with the total award value split across two weighted categories at the time of grant:

a)

50% Performance-Vested Units: Units were granted in March 2023 at target with equal weightings across two performance goals.  Units become earned and vested contingent on performance over the encouragementsubsequent 3-year performance period (2023 – 2025).  Earned units can range from 0% to 150% of excessivethe number granted.

b)

50% Time-Vested Restricted Units: Units were discretionarily granted in March 2023 within a range around the defined target level and vest ratably, 33% per year over three years.  While the target level of equity is established for each individual, actual awards can range from 75% to 125% of target to modify the program at grant.

The grant utilizes two performance goals: Pre-Tax Pre-Provision Net Income (PTPPNI) and Return on Average Tangible Common Shareholders’ Equity (ROATCE).  PTPPNI is measured on an absolute basis which is relative to internal budgets or targets, while ROATCE is a relative goal which is a percentile ranking compared to the Company’s proxy peer group.

During 2023, the Committee approved the following equity awards (for more detail on the awards granted to the Company’s NEOs, see the “Summary Compensation Table” and “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table below):

Restricted Units – during 2023, a total of 8,390 shares of restricted units were granted to our NEOs.

4.Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”). Mr. Nasca is the sole participant in the Evans Bank, N.A. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Senior Executives (“Senior Executive SERP”), which increases his retirement benefit above amounts available under the Company’s tax-qualified and other pension programs. The Committee believes that this plan, and the level of benefit that is provided under this plan, is appropriate to promote retention and to recognize and reward long-term service to the Company. The Senior Executive SERP provides a benefit to Mr. Nasca of 35% of his base salary payable for a period of 15 years or the present value of which may be paid in a lump sum.  Mr. Nasca has elected a present value lump sum payment. There is a 10-year vesting period with respect to Mr. Nasca’s benefits payable under the Senior Executive SERP which Mr. Nasca has satisfied. The Senior Executive SERP is unfunded and is considered a non-qualified plan for tax purposes.

5.Executive Incentive Retirement Plans. The Company provides certain key executives with a non-qualified retirement plan, the “Executive Incentive Retirement Plan,” which was frozen to new participants as of December 31, 2019 (“Frozen EIRP”). Messrs. Connerton and Pawlak participate in this plan. Mr. Nasca does not participate in the Frozen EIRP. The Frozen EIRP is unfunded and is considered a non-qualified plan for tax purposes.  As a frozen plan, new participants may not be added to the plan and participant accounts continue to earn interest at prime plus 100 basis points until a participant’s account is distributed. A new EIRP was adopted, effective on January 1, 2020 (the “New EIRP”), and it implements the same provisions as the Frozen EIRP except for the following enhancements:

Participant eligibility criteria was increased from a minimum total cash compensation of $100,000 annually to total cash compensation of $150,000.

A third payout criteria was created. Specifically, the participant is entitled to receive a distribution under the New EIRP upon his or her separation from service after attaining 62 and completing at least 10 years of service with the Company.

The New EIRP also requires a one year non-compete and non-solicitation for consistency with the current executive severance plan and change in control agreements.

"

Payments were adjusted from having both a single lump sum payout or unnecessary risk taking. Toward that end, the Company continueda 15-year equal payment installment option to emphasize the following prudent compensation practices during 2017:

Short-term and long-term incentive compensation is tied to both financial and non-financial performance measures2-to-15 year annual equal installments in order to further alignprovide the interests of NEOsCompany with thosea clawback opportunity in the event the participant fails to comply with the one year non-compete and non-solicitation covenants.

51


Messrs. Connerton and Pawlak participate in the New EIRP.  Mr. Nasca does not participate in the New EIRP.

Executive Compensation

6.Perquisites. The Company provides its NEOs with limited perquisites designed to assist the NEOs in being productive and which the Committee believes are reasonable, competitive and consistent with its overall executive compensation program. These perquisites, the aggregate cost of which is disclosed in the “Summary Compensation Table” below, generally include an auto allowance and club memberships, which the Committee believes are important to the NEOs’ development of business relationships, an activity critical to the long-term success of the Company. The Company believes that its perquisites allow the NEOs to carry out their duties more effectively.

Employment Agreement. The Company believes the use of clear and concise employment contracts can be an effective tool to attract and retain senior executives, as well as to protect proprietary information and customer relationships. However, in recent years and consistent with trends in corporate governance, the Committee has been limiting its use of executive employment contracts. Currently, Mr. Nasca is the only NEO covered by an employment contract. Mr. Nasca’s employment agreement is discussed under “Employment and Change in Control Agreements with our NEOs”.

Post-Termination Compensation. The Company is a party to an employment contract and post-termination compensation programs with its NEOs which provide for certain severance payments, described below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control,” if the executive’s employment terminates under certain circumstances. In addition, under the terms of the 2019 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, if there is a change in control of the Company followed by a qualifying termination of employment, an executive may be entitled to full acceleration of his or her equity-based compensation, as described above under “Elements of Executive Total Compensation – Equity Incentives.” The Committee believes that these arrangements are important as a recruitment and retention device, as most of the companies with which we compete for executive talent have similar severance protections for their executives. These arrangements may help incentivize the executive to remain with the Company and to assist in any potential change in control transaction, which provides security for the executive and stability for the Company. The Committee attempts to balance protection of its executives upon a change in control with protection of the Company’s interests by making accelerated vesting available upon a change in control only if the executive is involuntarily terminated or voluntarily resigns due to a job diminishment in connection with the change in control (a so-called “double-trigger”). Additionally, the Committee links severance payments to agreements by the executive not to compete with the Company, solicit the Company’s employees or customers, or disclose confidential information.

Mr. Nasca’s employment agreement provides for post-termination compensation, including in connection with a change in control. Furthermore, Mr. Connerton and Mr. Pawlak are party to post-termination compensation including a rolling two-year change in control agreement with the Company. The change in control agreement provides a double-trigger benefit. The change in control agreement is described below under “Employment and Change in Control Agreements with our NEOs.”

For further information on the potential payouts under these arrangements, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control” below.

Tax and Accounting Considerations. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”), generally denies publicly held corporations a federal income tax deduction for compensation exceeding $1,000,000 paid to the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and the three other highest paid executive officers during any taxable year of the corporation beginning after December 31, 2016. The Committee has historically attempted to structure its compensation arrangements to achieve deductibility under Section 162(m), unless the benefit of deductibility is considered by the Committee to be outweighed by the need for flexibility or attainment of other objectives. Since compensation objectives may not always be consistent with the requirements for tax deductibility, the Committee may, when it deems appropriate, enter into compensation arrangements under which payments will not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code.    

Say On Pay. Proposal II provides the Company’s shareholders with the opportunity to cast a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation. Shareholders are being asked to approve the compensation paid to the Company’s NEOs, as described in this proxy statement, including this “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the compensation tables and narrative discussions contained in this proxy statement under the caption “Executive Compensation”.

We attempt to maintain a regular dialogue with our major shareholders to discuss various corporate governance topics, including executive compensation that may be of interest to them. These discussions have provided useful guidance for the Committee as it reviews and adopts the various compensation policies and practices affecting our employees,

52


including our NEOs. At our 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, a substantial majority of our shareholders voted to approve the compensation paid to our NEOs, with 95% of the votes cast supporting the measure.

Executive Compensation

In reviewing the Company’s compensation programs and making decisions related to 2023 executive compensation, the Committee evaluated the results concerning the vote on the advisory resolution on executive compensation at that meeting. The Committee will continue to consider shareholder feedback when determining executive compensation.

Risk Assessment. The Committee believes that any risks arising from our compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, the Committee believes that the mix and design of elements of the Company’s executive compensation program do not encourage management to assume excessive risks and is evidenced through the following:

"

Each of the Company’s shareholders.

Compensation criteriaincentive plans establish lines of authority and risk mitigation, and are structured so that achievementsupported by strong governance, including active oversight by the Committee and the Board of corporate and individual goals do not encourage excessive risk-taking through the use of guardrails, which provide a top and bottom metric to monitor performance, and a mix of performance metrics, which reduce the risk associated with any single performance metric.Directors.

"

Performance-based compensation paid to our executive officers is subject to a “clawback” policy, providing for the return of incentive compensation in the event of a restatement of our financial statements involving fraud or illegal conduct.

No tax “gross-ups” are included in any employment-related agreements.

Perquisites and personal benefits are limited to those that support a demonstrated business purpose.

"

21


Change in control provisions in the Company’s employment and other agreements with its NEOs provide for payment of severance benefits, including accelerated vesting of stock options and restricted stock, only upon termination of employment or job diminishment in connection with a change in control (a so-called “double trigger” event). 

Activities of the Human Resource and Compensation Committee.  During 2017 the Human Resource and Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Committee”) reviewed and approved all of the Company’s executive and employee incentive plans to monitor the levels of risk involved in each program. 

Compensation Program Objectives and Overview.  The objective of the Company’s executive compensation programs is to attract, develop and retain executive officers capable of effectively leading the Company and maximizing performance for the benefit of the Company’s shareholders.  The Committee has reviewed the various elements of executive compensation provided by the Company during 2017 to ensure that the elements of compensation will align executives’ interests with those of the Company’s shareholders and the long-term interests of the Company.  The Committee determines the allocation of compensation among base salary, and short term and long term incentives by reviewing data from the Company’s Proxy Peer Group (described below) as well asEquity grants through the use of salary surveys and review of industry trends.  The Committee reviews each element of compensation to ensure the compensation packages offered will allow the Company to attract and retain superior executive talent and reward performance while not encouraging excessive risk-taking.  The Company’s executive compensation program during 2017, discussed in greater detail below, included:

Cash base salary and, where the Committee deemed it appropriate, employment contracts that are competitive within the industry and designed to enable the Company to recruit and retain highly-qualified individuals;

Cash bonus incentive plans, directly linking pay to both Company and individual performance and designed to motivate executives to deliver superior results without encouraging excessive risk-taking;

Long-term equity incentives, designed to align executives’ interests with those of the Company’s shareholders in achieving long-term performance;

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (“SERPs”), designed to assist the Company in retaining talented executives and rewarding long-term service to the Company;

A qualified 401(k) plan and a non-qualified deferred compensation plan, allowing executives to defer “pre-tax” earnings to save adequately for retirement;

Welfare programs designed to replace income in the event of sickness, accident, retirement or death; and

Limited perquisites based on demonstrated business purpose.

The decisions made on senior executive compensation, including NEO compensation, are based primarily upon the Committee’s assessment of each executive’s leadership and operational performance, and his or her potential to contribute to the long-term success and soundness of the Company and to enhance long-term shareholder value.  While the Committee does establish objective performance measures, such as those under the cash bonus incentive plan, the Committee primarily considers its subjective assessment of each individual’s performance rather than rigid formulas or short-term changes in business performance in determining the amount and mix of compensation elements and whether each particular payment or award provides an appropriate incentive and reward for performance that sustains and enhances long-term shareholder value.  Key factors affecting the Committee’s judgment include the executive’s performance compared to the financial, operational, and strategic goals established by the Board of Directors at the beginning of each fiscal year; contribution to the Company’s financial results, particularly with respect to key metrics such as asset growth, credit quality and earnings on capital; and effectiveness in leading our initiatives to increase shareholder value.  Additionally, the Committee assesses each executive’s presence in and commitment to the community.

22


Role of the Human Resource and Compensation Committee.  The Committee is composed solely of independent directors of the Company.  It is responsible for all policies and practices related to director, executive and employee compensation.  As part of this responsibility, the Committee, on an annual basis, reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to executive compensation, and reviews and evaluates the performance of each of the senior executive officers, including the NEOs, in light of those goals and objectives.   Compensation for the NEOs is reviewed and approved by the Committee during the first quarter of each year based on performance during the prior year.  Base salary is then reviewed a second time, typically during the third fiscal quarter, to determine whether an individual’s performance merits a further increase, or to address other changes that occur later in the fiscal year.

The Committee meets at least quarterly.  Members of Company management may attend Committee meetings to provide the Committee with information relating to the Company’s compensation and benefit plans and programs, recommended changes to those plans and programs, and educational material.  In particular, the Company’s President and CEO and its Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) attend Committee meetings to present data and analysis and to formulate recommendations regarding compensation for executive officers other than the President and CEO, benefit plans and promotions.  The CAO provides the Committee with data (such as the proxy peer group and compensation survey data described below) for its consideration in setting the base salary for the President and CEO.  In addition, certain members of the executive management team may attend Committee meetings to provide guidance on SEC reporting requirements as well as on other matters related to executive compensation, such as employee benefits and related insurance matters.  The Committee believes that this input from management is critical to ensuring that the Committee and its advisors have the data needed to make informed decisions with respect to the Company’s compensation programs and each NEO’s individual compensation.  In determining the base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentive components of CEO compensation, the Committee will consider multiple factors including the Company’s performance and relative shareholder return, the value of similar compensation elements paid to CEOs at comparable companies, and the awards given to the Company’s President and CEO in past years.  The Committee also spends a portion of each meeting convening in executive session, without the presence of any members of management or other attendees.

Role of Compensation Consultants.  In 2016, the Committee engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners (“Pearl Meyer”), a national executive compensation consultant specializing in aligning executive compensation with business and leadership strategy, to advise on the Company’s proxy peer group and to analyze and provide recommendations with respect to the competitiveness of the Company’s director compensation program.  Pearl Meyer advised the Company on the selection of the Company’s proxy peer group, which was created by the Committee, with input from management and Pearl Meyer for purposes of reviewing and setting 2017 compensation and to gauge the Company’s performance (the “2017 Proxy Peer Group”), as further described below.  In addition, Pearl Meyer reviewed and analyzed the Company’s director compensation program and made recommendations for 2017 director compensation.   Based on Pearl Meyer’s analysis of the Company’s 2017 Proxy Peer Group, and its report of best practices in director compensation, the Committee determined to increase the director retainer fees and committee fees and the value of the annual restricted stock grant.  These payments are disclosed above under “Director Compensation”.

During 2017, the Committee did not engage an independent compensation consultant.  Instead, the Committee Chairperson attended and spoke at the 2017 Bank Compensation & Talent Conference, a multi-day national conference geared toward financial institution human resource and compensation committee leaders that comprised knowledgeable speakers from national compensation consultant groups such as Pearl Meyer, McLagan of Aon plc, and Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC, along with industry compensation attorneys.  In addition, the Committee engaged in discussions with members of compensation committees from other financial institutions of comparable size and structure to learn about their practices for comparison purposes. These discussions did not result in any changes to 2017 compensation.

23


Benchmark Analysis.  The base salaries paid to the NEOs are compared to a “benchmark” established using relevant industry compensation surveys and compensation information derived from proxy statements filed by other publicly-held companies in the financial services industry.  The Committee considers the compensation data and financial performance of the financial institutions included in those surveys and filings.  For this analysis, the Committee also considers data from its proxy peer group.  The 2017 Proxy Peer Group included financial institutions with assets ranging from approximately one-half to slightly more than double the Company’s asset size, with return on assets, return on average equity and earnings per share similar to or better than the Company’s.  Based upon the Committee’s review and discussion, the 2017 Proxy Peer Group included 21 companies, 12 of which were included in the proxy peer group used for 2016 compensation. With the Company’s growth, some of the prior peers did not accurately represent an asset size within the desired range stated above.  The Committee also strived to include peers that had a comparable customer composition and geography.

The 2017 Proxy Peer Group included ACNB Corporation, CNB Financial Corporation, Chemung Financial Corporation, Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc., Enterprise Bancorp, Inc., Farmers National Banc Corp., First Savings Financial Group, Inc., German American Bancorp, Inc., Greene County Bancorp, Inc., Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc., Orrstown Financial Services, Inc., Parke Bancorp, Inc., Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc., Peoples Financial Services Corp., Stewardship Financial Corporation, Sussex Bancorp, Two River Bancorp and Unity Bancorp, Inc.

In addition, the Committee reviewed survey data published by Pearl Meyer as well as by McLagan of Aon plc, by both asset size as well as region.  While the 2017 Proxy Peer Group reflected financial institutions that are the most similarly situated to the Company, the Committee believes that it is useful to examine the “best practices” of a broader group of companies, and that multiple sources of compensation data assist the Company in designing pay programs that are both contemporary and relevant.  The Pearl Meyer compensation survey report for 2017 was used to analyze compensation from two groups of companies within the Northeastern U.S.  The first group consisted of approximately 35 financial institutions with asset sizes of $800 million to $1.5 billion and the second included approximately 35 institutions with asset sizes over $1.5 billion.  The McLagan survey is a report consisting of financial institutions across the U.S. segregated by asset size.  The Committee analyzed compensation data from a single group with approximately 25 companies each, identified by $1 billion to $3 billion in asset size. 

The Committee utilizes the salary surveys and the Proxy Peer Group data as sources of information in determining base salary for Messrs. Nasca and Connerton.  The Committee generally targets the 50th to the 75th percentile for the base salary of Messrs. Nasca and Connerton.    The base salary of Mr. Miller is compared to data from the salary surveys, but not to Proxy Peer Group data due to a lack of comparable data for his position.  As a result, Mr. Miller’s compensation is generally determined based upon his individual performance as compared to annual goals, including the achievement of corporate strategic and operational objectives.  For Messrs. Nasca and Connerton, the Committee uses the survey and peer group data as a point of reference and comparison only, for purposes of establishing certain target percentiles, but does not use the data to set a specific level of compensation to be achieved.  The survey data include companies that may not have the complexity of our organization, such as an insurance component, and we believe it is important to pay for the expertise required to manage all facets of our business.  Because the roles and responsibilities of executive officers can vary from one institution to another, the Committee also considers each NEO’s experience, length of service in his or her position, and individual performance.  The Committee has made the decision to pay above the 50th percentile for NEO salary where the Committee believes it is necessary to attract and retain superior executive talent and/or experience in order to support planned growth of the Company.  The Committee believes that this is appropriate in light of the expected future roles of the executives in supporting a larger organization as the Company continues to pursue a growth strategy.  During 2017, the Company paid Mr. Nasca 101% of the weighted survey average base salary at the 50th percentile, as reported in the 2017 salary surveys and 2017 Proxy Peer Group data utilized by the Committee as described above.  Mr. Connerton’s salary was 90% of the weighted survey average at the 50th percentile, which the Committee determined was appropriate due to his shorter tenure as CFO.  Mr. Miller’s salary was 104% of the weighted average base salary at the 50th percentile as reported in the 2017

24


salary surveys. See “Executive Total Compensation – Base Salary” below for a discussion of actions taken with respect to the NEOs’ base salaries in 2017.

Compensation Recovery Policy.  The Company’s Incentive Plan Clawback Policy provides for the recovery of performance-based compensation paid to certain senior executives of the Company, including the NEOs, in the event of a restatement of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  The policy applies to performance-based compensation paid during the three-year period prior to the correction of the accounting error, where the amount of such compensation paid to the executive was increased based on the erroneous financial statements, and the executive engaged in fraud or illegal conduct which materially contributed to the need for the restatement.  The policy generally covers compensation paid or awarded to executives under the Company’s short-term and long-term incentive plans.

Executive Total Compensation.  The following discussion describes the key elements of the Company’s NEO compensation program and the actions taken with respect to each element for 2017. 

1.Base Salary.  The Company’s approach to compensation begins with establishing a fair base salary determined by individual factors, such as the employee’s role in the organization, scope and complexity of responsibility of the position, the market value of his or her job, the level of an individual’s expertise in the role and his or her performance in the position, as well as Company performance factors, such as Company financial performance, including earnings per share and growth in net income.  Annual individual performance is measured for the CEO through a formal annual review by the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Chairman of the Committee.   Their review and recommendations are then reviewed and discussed with the full board prior making a final determination.  For other NEOs, individual performance is reviewed monthly with the CEO.  During these monthly meetings, any performance concerns are shared with the executive, and corrective measures (if needed) are outlined.  Based on these monthly meetings and his evaluation of each individual’s performance, the CEO makes recommendations to the Committee regarding annual adjustments to base salary for each of the other NEOs.  In determining base salary, the Committee also considers the level of achievement of corporate strategic and operational objectives established by the Committee as described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Role of the Human Resource and Compensation Committee and CEO.”  The Committee then compares the executive’s salary against market data as described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Benchmark Analysis.” 


The Company maintains a common anniversary date for the merit review process and related salary adjustments, which generally occur in the middle of the first quarter each year.  Salaries are then reviewed a second time, usually during the third quarter of each year.  After consideration of compensation data, Company performance and individual performance, the Committee makes a subjective assessment of each individual’s performance as described in the preceding paragraph, and above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Program Objectives and Overview.”  While it is uncommon for an individual to receive an increase at both review cycles (winter and summer), this may occur when an individual expands his or her skill set or experience, or demonstrates outstanding performance or increased responsibility.  For 2017, the Committee approved discretionary increases to the base salary of Messrs. Nasca. Connerton and Miller, effective March 8, 2017, as follows: Mr. Nasca’s annual base salary was increased from $425,006 to $460,000 or 8.2%; Mr. Connerton’s annual base salary was increased from $182,700 to $200,000 or 9.5%, and Mr. Miller’s annual base salary was increased from $265,223 to $271,854 or 2.5%.  Mr. Nasca’s increase was made due to the Committee’s assessment of his contributions in delivering on the goals of the Strategic Plan.  Mr. Connerton received his increase due to quickly fulfilling the expectations of his position since being appointed as chief financial officer in November 2015 and in recognition of his financial management of the Company.   

25


2.Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation.  The Evans Excels Performance Incentive Plan (the “Evans Excels Plan”) is a short-term cash incentive compensation plan intended to reward performance of officers of the Bank, including the NEOs.  The plan is designed to motivate employees to attain desired objectives and to encourage teamwork and collaboration while aligning compensation with overall Company performance.  This plan is a key element of the total compensation benefits provided to our NEOs and allows the Company to remain competitive with the market by providing the opportunity to receive significant cash incentives.  The design of the plan is intended to ensure that no benefits are paid to executives and other employees unless Company performance goals are attained (subject to the Committee’s discretionary authority to award payouts notwithstanding a failure to achieve those goals, as described below).  If the Company performance goals are attained, the Committee then considers, with management’s input, each employee’s individual performance in determining whether to make awards under the plan, as described below. 

For 2017, the Committee utilized Company annual adjusted net income as the measure for determining whether awards would be paid under the Evans Excels Plan.  The Committee determined the levels of growth in adjusted net income which it believes provide a reasonable balance between shareholder value and appropriate employee motivation and reward.  Adjusted net income is a non-GAAP financial measure, and is defined as net income (GAAP) as reported in the Company’s financial statements excluding the short-term incentive payment, which is calculated net of any tax impact associated with the short-term incentive payment.  The goals set for 2017 and the actual results, as derived from GAAP net income, were as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Stretch

 

Actual



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income (GAAP)

 

$

9,650,029 

 

$

10,056,871 

 

$

10,464,733 

 

$

10,478,920 

Evans Excels Plan payments

 

 

666,461 

 

 

1,330,262 

 

 

1,996,723 

 

 

1,815,211 

Tax Effect

 

 

(259,920)

 

 

(518,802)

 

 

(778,722)

 

 

(700,671)

Adjusted Net Income

 

$

10,056,570 

 

$

10,868,331 

 

$

11,682,734 

 

$

11,593,460 

In 2017, the "stretch goal" was not met, however the Committee decided to exercise its discretion and pay awards at the stretch level. Although the Company’s 2017 performance was slightly short of the adjusted net income stretch goal, the Committee believes this result is not reflective of management's operating performance due to unusual circumstances related to the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”) and the corresponding impact on net income. The TCJA was signed into law in December 2017 and resulted in the Company taking a one-time, nonrecurring $2.1 million charge to net income. This charge was not due to any management operating decisions and occurred without an ability for management to anticipate or react in time to off-set any negative impact.  The Company expects to benefit in subsequent fiscal years from the changes to federal income tax law resulting from the TCJA.  

The Committee sets both Company and individual NEO goals each year in reviewing the Board-approved four-year Strategic Plan and aligning Board-approved business targets and associated desired metric results with the calendar year.  Company performance goals for each performance year are set in the fourth quarter of the prior year, and individual performance goals are set in the first quarter of the relevant performance year.  Goals are then cascaded from the Strategic Plan to the CEO and then to each NEO.  The 2017 individual NEO goals are presented in the table below. 

All awards are to be paid out as a percentage of a participant’s annual salary as in effect on the last calendar day during the relevant performance period, which runs from January 1st to December 31st. The Company typically makes payments in February following the end of the performance period.

In addition to the Company performance measure discussed above, the Committee considers individual performance and attainment of assigned goals. Even if the threshold (or higher) Company performance measure is met, an employee must meet a certain level of individual performance to

26


receive payment under the plan. Historically, the Committee has considered a broad variety of individual performance goals to establish specific individual performance measures.  The Committee reviews these specific performance measures and exercises some degree of discretion in determining each employee’s payout amount. The Committee also has the discretionary authority to grant awards notwithstanding Company performance below threshold, and to raise, lower or eliminate an NEO’s incentive payout regardless of individual or Company performance.  However, the Committee intends to exercise its discretionary authority only in unusual circumstances where such a modification is warranted, and believes that establishing specific performance measures for each participant will enhance the ability of the plan to encourage individual performance in those targeted areas.  

The individual performance measures established by the Committee are a combination of financial goals derived from the Company’s strategic plan, and discretionary assessment.  Each performance measure receives a weighting, which represents its relative importance to overall individual performance under the plan.  For each individual performance measure, the Committee establishes a “target”, “threshold” and “stretch” standard. 

The table below shows the performance measures and relative weightings of the various performance measures utilized for the NEOs for 2017.  A performance measure requiring an NEO to deliver on a specified strategic plan goal will be broken down into several specific goals/action items, and whether the NEO achieves that goal at threshold, target or stretch level (or not at all) will be determined based on the extent to which he achieved meaningful results toward those specific goals/action items.  Under the terms of the plan, an individual must be employed by the Company on the payment date in order to receive payment under the plan.  The following performance measures were utilized for the NEOs for 2017:

NEO

Performance Measure

Weight

2017 Performance Rating

David Nasca

Adjusted Net Income

50%

Achieved at Target

Efficiency Ratio Improvement

23%

Achieved at Stretch

Leadership

13%

Achieved at Stretch

Risk Management

14%

Achieved at Target

John Connerton

Adjusted Net Income

30%

Achieved at Target

Efficiency Ratio Improvement

25%

Achieved at Stretch

Risk Management

16%

Achieved at Stretch

Successful Build Out of Business Model

13%

Achieved at Stretch

Leadership

16%

Achieved at Stretch

Robert G. Miller, Jr.

Adjusted Net Income

21%

Achieved at Target

Insurance Revenue Growth

42%

Achieved at Stretch

Leadership

17%

Achieved at Stretch

Execute on Acquisition Strategy

20%

Achieved at Stretch

The payouts are determined pursuant to the sum of the weightings for each individual’s total goal set for 2017 before any discretionary override placed by the Committee.  Each goal’s weight is determined by its level of importance and influence level in achieving the goals  set forth in the

27


Company’s Strategic Plan. Notwithstanding the individuals’ achievement of their specific performance measures, the established levels of Company performance, described above, are required to “open” the plan to allow payout of incentives.   If the minimum adjusted net income (threshold) level is not met, no awards would be payable pursuant to the plan, except that the Board of Directors may, at its discretion, grant awards notwithstanding Company performance below threshold, and may raise, lower or eliminate an NEO’s payout regardless of Company or individual performance.  To date, the Board of Directors has not exercised its discretionary authority to provide for a payout where the Company’s performance was below threshold.  For 2017, the Committee did, however, exercise its discretionary authority to award payouts as though the Company’s stretch goal had been met, as described above, and to increase Mr. Nasca’s payout by 9.5%, Mr. Connerton’s payout by 3.5% and Mr. Miller’s payout by 2.5% of their respective base salary, as indicated in the Summary Compensation Table, below.

Most of the discretionary increase for each of the NEO’s payouts was made to compensate for the unusual circumstance of the passage of the TCJA late in 2017 and the corresponding $2.1 million net income impact which caused the Company to fall slightly short of the adjusted net income stretch goal.   The Committee believes that the failure to meet the stretch level was not reflective of management operating decisions.  The Company expects to benefit in the subsequent fiscal years from the changes from TCJA.  The impact of the discretion used as it relates to the stretch level payment despite the Company’s adjusted net income being below the stretch level was an increase of Mr. Nasca’s payout by 7.5%, Mr. Connerton’s payout by 3.5%, and Mr. Miller’s payout by 2.5% of their respective base salary.

The Committee also used its discretionary authority to increase Mr. Nasca’s payout by 2.0% of his base salary in order to recognize his significant contributions to the Company’s success during 2017 and to avoid his being unfairly penalized for a failure to achieve one specific stretch objective within one of the Strategic Plan goals. 

The amounts paid under the plan to each NEO for 2017 are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table, below.

The following table illustrates the cash incentive payment, as a percentage of 2017 base salary, that would be payable to each of our NEOs if all individual goals were met at the specified level of performance (assuming Company achievement of at least the “threshold” performance level and no Committee discretionary override).

NEO

Threshold

Target

Stretch

David Nasca

15% 30% 45% 

Robert G. Miller, Jr.

12% 24% 36% 

John Connerton

12% 24% 36% 

These percentages are determined through the Committee’s research in reviewing proxy peer group and compensation survey data in addition to the Committee’s assessment of appropriate incentive levels that are aligned with the financial goals of the Strategic Plan.

3.Equity Incentives.  While the Evans Excels Plan focuses on the achievement of short-term performance measures, the Company’s shareholder-approved 20092019 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan is designed to provide key employees with a reward opportunity that aligns the interests of the participants with those of the Company’s shareholders by focusing on our Company’s performance over a longer period of time.  The equity incentive plan both links the size of awards granted to the NEOs to the past performance of the Company and ties the ultimate realizable value of those awards to the future value of the Company’s common stock, thereby aligning the NEOs’ interests with those of the Company’s shareholders, and encouraging a balance between growth and prudent risk-taking. 

28


Under the equity incentive plan, the Committee typically grants awards of restricted stock, which provides immediate value to the NEO (subject to vesting) but loses value in the event that shareholder value decreases, and stock options, under which the NEO recognizes value commensurate with increases in long-term shareholder value.  In 2017, after considering various alternatives under the equity incentive plan, the Committee determined to continue with its past practice of granting stock options and restricted stock based upon a mix of corporate and individual performance factors that influence this discretionary award. 

Both restricted stock and stock options link an NEO’s compensation to long-term Company performance.  The Committee believes that restricted stock is a particularly effective incentive tool because the value of the award can be further enhanced if the value of the Company’s common stock increases after the date the restrictions lapse.  The Committee further believes that stock options are an effective long-term incentive because the holder can only profit if the value of the Company’s common stock increases.  Both types of equity awards also have a retentive effect because they vest over a period of time, typically four years.  Vesting may be accelerated under certain circumstances, such as the executive’s death, disability or retirement, or if an executive’s employment is terminated in connection with a change in control of our Company.  Holders of restricted stock receive dividends if and when dividends are paid on the Company’s common stock during the restrictive period, and have voting rights during the restriction period.  Holders of stock options, on the other hand, have no rights as a shareholder until the options are exercised.   Awards granted under the equity incentive plan typically consist of 75% shares of restricted stock and 25% stock options, which the Committee believes is an appropriate formula to drive increased equity ownership by the Company’s executive officers.  The Committee may also grant awards of stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units under the equity incentive plan, but it has not historically done so. 

The Committee believes that the Evans Excels short-term incentive plan and the equity-based long-term incentive plan together create a balance between short-term and long-term performance goals and encourage appropriate risk-taking.

The Committee exercises its discretion in determining when to grant equity incentive awards, as well as the size and nature of the awards.  Equity awards are typically granted on an annual basis, during the first quarter, based on prior year financial performance, but may under certain circumstances be granted at other times during the year, for example, in connection with a new hire or a change in position within the Company.  As a general matter, the Committee’s process is independent of any consideration of the timing of the release of material non-public information, including with respect to the determination of grant dates or stock option exercise prices.  The Committee has never timed the release of material non-public information to affect the value of executive compensation.  In general, the release of such information reflects long-established timetables for the disclosure of material non-public information such as earnings reports or, with respect to other events reportable under federal securities laws, the applicable requirements of such laws with respect to timing of disclosure.  In determining the amount of each award, the Committee looks at the Company’s performance during the prior year, the number of shares remaining available for issuance under the plan, the market price for the Company’s common stock, and the Committee’s subjective assessment of each individual’s performance.  In 2017, the Committee reviewed a combination of performance factors, ranging from financial metrics to each individual’s contribution in achieving the goals set forth in the Company’s Strategic Plan.  The Committee does not establish specified pre-determined target award values.

During 2017, the Committee approved the following equity awards (for more detail on the awards granted to the Company’s NEOs, see the “Summary Compensation Table” and “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table below):

Restricted Shares – during 2017, a total of 14,680 shares of restricted stock were granted to 37 employees, of which 3,810 were granted to our NEOs.

Stock Options – during 2017, a total of 24,990 options were granted to 35 employees, of which 7,820 were granted to our NEOs.

29


4.Executive Deferred Salary Plan.  Under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan, participating NEOs are able to defer, at their election, up to 100% of their base salary.  This deferred salary amount accrues interest at the rate of prime plus 1%, based upon prime as stated in the Wall Street Journal as of January 1st each year (3.75% at January 1, 2017).  The plan is designed to provide a vehicle for executives, including NEOs, to defer their base salary on a “pre-tax” basis in order to achieve their personal retirement goals, and the Committee believes that this plan is useful in recruiting and retaining talented executive officers.  The Company does not contribute to this plan but accrues a liability expense for future payment.  The plan is unfunded and considered a non-qualified plan for tax purposes.  While all of the NEOs are eligible to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan, to date, only Mr. Miller has elected to participate in this plan.  His contributions to the plan for 2017 are set forth below under “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan”.

5.Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (“SERPs”).  Messrs. Nasca and Miller are participants in SERPs provided by the Bank, which increase their retirement benefits above amounts available under the Company’s tax-qualified and other pension programs.  The Committee believes that these plans, and the level of benefits that are provided under these plans, are appropriate to promote retention and to recognize and reward long-term service to the Company.  Mr. Nasca is the sole participant in the Evans Bank, N.A. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Senior Executives (the “Senior Executive SERP”).  The Senior Executive SERP provides a benefit to Mr. Nasca of 35% of his base salary for a period of 15 years. There is a 10-year vesting period on this plan.  The Senior Executive SERP is unfunded and is considered a non-qualified plan for tax purposes.   Mr. Miller participates in the Company’s legacy SERP, which is closed to new participants (the “Legacy SERP”). The Legacy SERP is considered an offset plan, designed to provide 70% of base salary offset by benefits provided under the Defined Benefit Pension Plan, Company contributions to the Evans Employee Savings Plan (401(k) plan), and the value of Company contributions to social security benefits.  The Legacy SERP provides a 15-year benefit, but the benefit is not frozen at a specific age.  Like the Senior Executive SERP, the Legacy SERP is unfunded and is considered a non-qualified plan for tax purposes.  Mr. Miller’s annual benefit, when combined with amounts payable under the Company’s tax-qualified and other pension programs and social security, will equal 70% of the average of his highest five consecutive years’ salary and bonus.

6.Executive Incentive Retirement Plan.  The Company provides certain key executives with an additional non-qualified retirement plan, the “Executive Incentive Retirement Plan” (“EIRP”).  The plan provides an annual contribution by the Company equal to 5% of the executive’s base salary at year end, which then earns interest at prime plus 1%. Mr. Connerton is the only NEO participating in this plan.  The EIRP is unfunded and is considered a non-qualified plan for tax purposes.

7.Perquisites.  The Company provides its NEOs with limited perquisites designed to assist the NEOs in being productive and which the Committee believes are reasonable, competitive and consistent with its overall executive compensation program.  These perquisites, the aggregate cost of which is disclosed in the “Summary Compensation Table” below, generally include an auto allowance and club memberships, which the Committee believes are important to the NEOs’ development of business relationships, an activity critical to the long-term success of the Company, and long-term disability insurance. The Company believes that its perquisites allow senior executive officers to operate more effectively.

Employment Agreements.  The Company believes the use of clear and concise employment contracts can be an effective tool to attract and retain senior executives, as well as to protect proprietary information and customer relationships.  However, in recent years and consistent with trends in corporate governance, the Committee has been limiting its use of executive employment contracts.  The Company has historically been a party to employment contracts with several of its NEOs.  Currently, only Mr. Nasca is covered by an employment contract, which is described below under “Employment Agreements with Our NEOs”.

30


Post-Termination Compensation.  As mentioned above, the Company has historically been a party to employment contracts with its NEOs which provide for certain severance payments, described below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control,” if the executive’s employment terminates under circumstances described in the employment contract.  In addition, under the terms of the Company’s 2009 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, if there is a change in control of the Company, the executive may be entitled to full acceleration of his equity-based compensation, as described above under “Executive Total Compensation – Equity Incentives.”  The Committee believes that these arrangements are important as a recruitment and retention device, as most of the companies with which we compete for executive talent have similar arrangements in place for their executives.  These arrangements may help incentivize the executive to remain with the Company and to assist in any potential change in control transaction, which provides security for the executive and stability for the Company.  The Committee attempts to balance protection of its executives upon a change in control with protection of the Company’s interests by making accelerated vesting available upon a change in control only if the executive is involuntarily terminated or experiences a job diminishment in connection with the change in control (a so-called “double-trigger”).  Additionally, the Committee links severance payments to agreements by the executive not to compete with the Company, solicit the Company’s employees or customers, or disclose confidential information.

Currently, only Mr. Nasca is a party to an employment contract providing for such change-in-control payments.  However, each of Mr. Miller and Mr. Connerton is a party to a rolling two-year change in control agreement with the Company.  The change in control agreement, like the accelerated vesting of equity awards described above, provides a double-trigger benefit.

For further information on the potential payouts under these arrangements, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control”, below.

Executive Severance Plan.  The Company’s Executive Severance Plan provides post-termination coverage to executive officers who are not covered under an employment contract that provides for severance or similar post-employment compensation, or whose benefits are triggered only under a change in control agreement.  Under the Executive Severance Plan, a participant (1) whose employment is involuntarily terminated by the Company for reasons other than for cause, as defined in the plan, (2) who is required to move employment more than 35 miles from his or her current place of employment, and who rejects the relocation and terminates employment, or (3) whose aggregate compensation is materially reduced, and who terminates employment, will be eligible for severance payments under the Executive Severance Plan.  Under the plan, a participant eligible for benefits would receive 12 months of salary continuance plus the participant’s short term incentive amount at the target level, pro-rated for the time during the year in which the participant was actively employed by the Company.  The severance payments will be made over the 12-month period following termination in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll cycle.  In addition, the Company will reimburse eligible participants for up to $5,000 in outplacement services during the 12-month period following termination (payable in a lump sum, in cash).  Payments and benefits under the Executive Severance Plan are subject to the participant’s compliancemulti-year vesting and performance-based elements to align interests with one-year non-competitionshareholders.

"

Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our directors and non-solicitation covenants, and an employee will cease to be a participant in this plan if severance benefits are triggered under an employment contract or change in control agreement.  Messrs. Miller and Connerton are participants in the Executive Severance Plan.  Mr. Nasca, who has an employment contract providing for severance benefits, does not participate in this plan. 

Tax and Accounting Considerations.  Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally denies publicly-held corporations a federal income tax deduction for compensation exceeding $1,000,000 paid to the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and the three other highest paid executive officers, (other thanincluding NEOs, from engaging in any hedging or monetization transactions involving the CEO and CFO), excluding performance-based compensation.  With the enactment of TCJA in December 2017, the deductibility of executive compensation is now further limited and the covered group under the amended statute has been expanded.  The TCJA expands the definition of covered employees to include the CFO, CEO, and the three most highly compensated officers for the tax year and designates covered employees as covered employees forever.  Previously, if a covered employee retired, the individual would no longer be considered covered in retirement.    While Section 162(m) has not historically impactedCompany’s securities.

Summary Compensation Table. The following table sets forth the compensation of the Company’s NEOs for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021. The NEOs identified in the table below are the Company’s Principal Executive Officer, and two other most highly compensated individuals who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2023 and met the applicable SEC reporting threshold.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name and
Principal Position

 

Year

Salary

Stock Awards
(1)

Option Awards
(1)

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
(2)

Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
(3)

All Other Compensation
(4)

Total



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

David J. Nasca

 

2023

$

579,577 

$

169,926 

$

-    

$

202,825 

$

17,110 

$

72,050 

$

1,041,488 

President and CEO of the

 

2022

$

563,327 

$

164,992 

$

-    

$

197,029 

$

306,674 

$

67,163 

$

1,299,185 

Company and the Bank

 

2021

$

550,000 

$

123,820 

$

41,262 

$

262,955 

$

-    

$

61,396 

$

1,039,433 

(principal executive officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John B. Connerton

 

2023

$

273,060 

$

66,615 

$

-    

$

76,478 

$

-    

$

59,899 

$

476,052 

Treasurer of the

 

2022

$

265,097 

$

64,696 

$

-    

$

76,991 

$

-    

$

46,626 

$

453,410 

Company and Executive

 

2021

$

258,090 

$

48,434 

$

16,146 

$

116,471 

$

-    

$

48,237 

$

487,378 

Vice President and CFO of the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bank (principal financial officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kenneth D. Pawlak

 

2023

$

264,232 

$

61,220 

$

-    

$

57,591 

$

-    

$

37,552 

$

420,595 

53


31

 


the deductibility of the Company’s executive compensation, the expansion of the definition of covered employee into retirement is expected to lead to tax liability for the Company with respect to Mr. Nasca, who has elected under the terms of the Senior Executive SERP to receive his benefit in a lump sum, which will exceed $1 million.   This assessment is based on the Committee’s initial analysis of the TCJA.   Given the complexity of the TCJA, anticipated guidance from the U.S. Treasury regarding implementation of the TCJA, and the potential for guidance from the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Accounting Standards Board related to the TCJA,  this assessment may be adjusted later to reflect any such guidance provided.  The Committee will continue to monitor the impact of the TCJA on the Company’s ability to deduct executive compensation, and in particular, will review future Internal Revenue Service rulings related to the tax treatment of executive compensation.  Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code generally changes the tax rules that affect most forms of deferred compensation that were not earned and vested prior to 2005, and imposes an additional tax on certain forms of deferred compensation.  The Committee takes Section 409A into account in determining the form and timing of compensation paid to the Company’s executives.  While Section 409A is generally not applicable to the compensation provided by the Company, it does affect the timing of certain severance and non-qualified benefit payments. 

The Company values stock option and restricted stock grants under FASB ASC Topic 718.  More information regarding the application of ASC Topic 718 by the Company may be found in Note 12 to the Company’s audited financial statements filed with the SEC in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

Say On Pay.  Proposal II provides the Company’s shareholders with the opportunity to cast a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation.  Shareholders are being asked to approve the compensation paid to the Company’s NEOs, as described in this proxy statement, including this “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the compensation tables and narrative discussions contained in this proxy statement under the caption “Executive Compensation”. 

We attempt to maintain a regular dialogue with our major shareholders to discuss various corporate governance topics, including executive compensation that may be of interest to them.  These discussions have provided useful guidance for our Committee as it reviews and adopts the various compensation policies and practices affecting our employees, including our NEOs.  At our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, a substantial majority of our shareholders voted to approve the compensation paid to our NEOs, with 91% of the votes cast supporting the measure. 

In reviewing the Company’s compensation programs and making decisions related to 2017 executive compensation, the Committee evaluated the results concerning the vote on the advisory resolution on executive compensation at that meeting. Going forward, the Committee will continue to consider shareholder feedback when determining executive compensation.

32


Summary Compensation Table.  The following table sets forth the compensation of the Company’s NEOs for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.  The NEOs identified in the table below are the Company's Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and one other individual who was serving as an executive officer as of  December 31, 2017 and met the applicable SEC reporting threshold.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name and
Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary
(1)

 

Bonus
(2)

 

Stock Awards
(3)

 

Option Awards
(3)

 

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
(4)

 

Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
(5)(6)(7)

 

All Other Compensation
(8)

 

Total

David Nasca

 

2017

 

$

453,271 

 

$

-    

 

$

79,790 

 

$

26,602 

 

$

207,000 

 

$

72,372 

 

$

45,964 

 

$

884,999 

President and CEO of the

 

2016

 

 

423,468 

 

 

-    

 

 

76,000 

 

 

25,305 

 

 

153,002 

 

 

-    

 

 

45,024 

 

 

722,800 

Company and the Bank

 

2015

 

 

417,115 

 

 

-    

 

 

70,452 

 

 

23,453 

 

 

102,687 

 

 

321,325 

 

 

43,427 

 

 

978,459 

(principal executive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John Connerton

 

2017

 

$

196,675 

 

$

-    

 

$

28,835 

 

$

9,615 

 

$

72,000 

 

$

4,414 

 

$

36,337 

 

$

347,876 

Treasurer of the

 

2016

 

 

181,142 

 

 

-    

 

 

28,250 

 

 

9,451 

 

 

58,099 

 

 

2,605 

 

 

33,819 

 

 

313,367 

Company and  Executive

 

2015

 

 

151,699 

 

 

40,970 

 

 

18,046 

 

 

5,968 

 

 

24,183 

 

 

-    

 

 

20,222 

 

 

261,088 

Vice President and CFO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of the Bank (principal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

financial officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert Miller, Jr.

 

2017

 

$

270,579 

 

$

-    

 

$

41,870 

 

$

13,910 

 

$

97,867 

 

$

199,030 

 

$

48,927 

 

$

672,183 

Secretary of the

 

2016

 

 

264,726 

 

 

-    

 

 

40,750 

 

 

13,567 

 

 

63,000 

 

 

134,345 

 

 

48,175 

 

 

564,563 

Company, President of                                                               

 

2015

 

 

267,978 

 

 

-    

 

 

39,799 

 

 

13,262 

 

 

43,389 

 

 

-    

 

 

39,269 

 

 

403,697 

TEA and Executive Vice

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

President of the Bank      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Amounts reported under “salary” for Mr. Miller include the “employee portion” of residual commissions earned on certain products sold through M&W Group, Inc. prior to September 1, 2000.

(2) Mr. Connerton received a retention bonus in 2015 after fulfilling a two year obligation to remain with the Bank that began in 2013. 

(3) Reflects the aggregate fair value of the awards at grant date as determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for financial statement reporting purposes.  For additional information as to the assumptions made in valuation, see Note 12 to the financial statements filed with the SEC in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.  Amounts shown in the table are based on the Company’s accounting expense for these awards, and do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that may be realized by the NEOs.    

(4)  Although the Company did not meet its “stretch” goal for fiscal 2017 under its Evans Excels Plan, as described above under “Executive Total Compensation”, the Committee exercised its discretion to award payouts as though the Company had achieved the stretch goal. Considered together with each NEO’s individual goals described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Executive Total Compensation,” this resulted in payouts at “stretch” level.

(5) With respect to Mr. Nasca, includes the aggregate change in the accumulated benefits under the Bank’s Senior Executive SERP.  For 2016, the aggregate change in actuarial present value of accumulated benefits for Mr. Nasca was a negative number. However, applicable SEC rules require that we report a “$0” in this column instead of the negative number. The actual decrease in actuarial present values for 2016 was $(19,553).

(6)  With respect to Mr. Miller, includes the aggregate change in the accumulated benefits under the Bank’s Defined Benefit Pension Plan and the Legacy SERP.  For 2015, the aggregate change in actuarial present value of accumulated benefits for Mr. Miller was a negative number. However, applicable SEC rules require that we report a “$0” in this column instead of the negative number. The actual decrease in actuarial present values for 2015 was $(79,906).

(7)  With respect to Mr. Connerton, includes the aggregate change in the accumulated benefits under the Bank’s Defined Benefit Pension Plan. For 2015, the aggregate change in actuarial present value of accumulated benefits for Mr. Connerton was a negative number. However, applicable SEC rules require that we report a “$0” in this column instead of the negative number. The actual decrease in actuarial present values for 2015 was $(138).

(8)  For 2017, includes: 401(k) matching contributions of $16,200 $11,800,  and $16,247 for Mr. Nasca, Mr. Connerton, and Mr. Miller respectively; the $16,929 cost of Mr. Miller’s use of a Company owned automobile; club dues for Mr. Nasca of $14,252; the Company’s contribution to the EIRP for Mr. Connerton of $13,229; the economic benefit of an endorsement split-dollar life insurance policy held by the Bank; dividends paid on unvested restricted stock awards; auto allowances for Mr. Nasca and Mr. Connerton; and club dues for Mr. Miller. Other than the items for which specified dollar amounts were provided, none of the items specified in this footnote (8) exceeded $10,000 for any individual NEO.    

33


Grants of Plan-Based Awards.  The following table reflects the terms of the compensation plan-based awards granted to Named Executive Officers in 2017.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grants of Plan Based Awards



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)

 

All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units

 

All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options

 

Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards (per share)
(2)

 

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
(3)



 

 

 

 

Threshold

 

 

Target

 

 

Stretch

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

David Nasca

 

3/22/2017

 

$

69,000 

 

$

138,000 

 

$

207,000 

 

2,020 

 

4,150 

 

$

39.50 

 

$

106,392 

John Connerton

 

3/22/2017

 

$

24,000 

 

$

48,001 

 

$

72,001 

 

730 

 

1,500 

 

$

39.50 

 

$

38,450 

Robert Miller, Jr.     

 

3/22/2017

 

$

32,622 

 

$

65,245 

 

$

97,867 

 

1,060 

 

2,170 

 

$

39.50 

 

$

55,780 

(1)  Values reflect possible payouts assuming both Company and individual performance at the specified levels under the Evans Excels Plan. As discussed above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Executive Total Compensation – Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation,” although the maximum, or “stretch”, level of Company performance under the Evans Excels Plan for 2017 was not met as a result of the impact of the enactment of the TCJA in December 2017, the Committee exercised its discretion to ratify payouts at “stretch” level to all of the NEOs.   Individual performance levels and results achieved are specified in the table included in that section, and actual amounts paid to the NEOs for 2017 are included in the Summary Compensation Table, above.

(2) Reflects the exercise price for the options granted, which was the closing market price for the Company’s common stock on the grant date.

(3) Reflects full grant date fair value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of the stock and options granted.  For additional information as to the assumptions made in valuation, see Note 12 to the financial statements filed with the SEC in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

The option and restricted stock awards in 2017 were granted under the Company’s 2009 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan. 25% of the options and restricted stock granted will vest each year on the anniversary of the grant date, subject to acceleration of vesting upon the individual’s death, disability, retirement, or involuntary termination in connection with a change in control.  The awards shown in the table above will be fully vested in 2021.  Dividends are paid on unvested stock awards when and as declared by the Board of Directors.

Employment Agreements with our NEOs

We have historically entered into employment contracts with our NEOs.  Currently, only Mr. Nasca, our CEO, has an employment contract.  Mr. Miller and Mr. Connerton are currently employed on an “at will” basis. 

The material terms of Mr. Nasca’s employment contract are as follows:

David J. Nasca - Employment Agreement, by and among Mr. Nasca, the Company and the Bank, pursuant to which Mr. Nasca serves as theVice President and                                         

Chief ExecutiveGrowth Officer of the Company and the Bank.  Subject to prior termination, the term of Mr. Nasca's employment is for a three year term, which is renewed daily until his 62nd birthday (October 27, 2019), at which time the contract will have a remaining and declining three year term.  Automatic daily renewal will cease if the Bank gives Mr. Nasca written notice of non-renewal, in which case Mr. Nasca’s employment will end 36 months after the date of the non-renewal notice, unless the parties agree to a shorter period.  Mr. Nasca’s employment agreement provides for an initial base salary, which is adjusted annually by the Board of Directors of Evans Bank, N.A., provided, however, that Mr. Nasca’s annual salary may not be decreased.  Mr. Nasca is entitled to participate in all Company and Bank cash and equity incentive programs made available to senior executives, as well as all employee benefit plans, programs, and arrangements for which he qualifies.  He is entitled to four weeks paid vacation each year, plus five personal days and customary bank holidays.  The Bank provides Mr. Nasca with a monthly automobile allowance of $750 and reimburses him for reasonable club dues and certain other expenses he incurs in the performance of his duties under the agreement. 

34

 


 

 

In the event Mr. Nasca's employment is terminated:

 

by the Company or the Bank without “cause” or by Mr. Nasca for “good reason,” or under certain circumstances within one year following a “change in control” of the Company, he will be paid three times the sum of the highest base salary paid to him at any time under the employment agreement plus the average annual non-equity incentive bonus paid to Mr. Nasca in the three years prior to termination.  The Company will also continue to provide amounts or benefits payable under applicable benefit plans for 36 months;

 

because of death, his estate will be paid a lump sum amount equal to two times Mr. Nasca’s then annual base salary, as well as any amounts or benefits payable under applicable benefit plans, but subject to offset for any payment due Mr. Nasca under any life insurance plan maintained by the Company or the Bank;

 

because of “disability,” (i) Mr. Nasca will be entitled to participate in the short- and long-term disability plans and benefits offered by the Bank to senior executives, including long-term disability income replacement benefits and supplemental retirement benefits under a long-term disability program; and (ii) the Bank will continue to provide Mr. Nasca with certain life and medical insurance benefits under the same cost-sharing arrangement as in effect for active employees until Mr. Nasca’s (A) full-time employment by another employer, (B) attaining age 65, or (C) death;

 

by the Company or the Bank for “cause” or by Mr. Nasca other than for “good reason,” Mr. Nasca will not be entitled to payment of any amounts or benefits, other than that portion of his annual salary accrued through the date of termination and any accrued and unpaid vacation.

 

The Company's or the Bank's obligation to make such payments to Mr. Nasca are conditioned upon Mr. Nasca's compliance with his obligations of confidentiality, non-competition and  non-solicitation set forth in his employment agreement.

 

35

 


 

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.  The following table shows the potential incremental value transfer to each NEO under various termination or change-in-control scenarios as of December 31, 2017, the last business day of fiscal 2017.  Unvested, unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock awards are valued at the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on that date.  The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such NEO's separation from the Company.

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Event

 

David Nasca

 

John Connerton

 

Robert Miller, Jr.



 

 

 

 

 

 

��

 

 

Retirement or Voluntary Termination Without "Good Reason" (1)

 

$

728,778 

 

$

119,482 

 

$

1,964,999 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Termination for "Cause" (1)

 

$

728,778 

 

$

119,482 

 

$

1,964,999 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Termination Without "Cause" or for "Good Reason" (2)(5)

 

$

2,622,624 

 

$

367,485 

 

$

2,302,098 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"Change in Control" Termination (3)(5)

 

$

3,793,879 

 

$

817,509 

 

$

2,778,919 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Death or Disability (4)(5)

 

$

2,542,130 

 

$

672,120 

 

$

2,778,919 

 

(1) With respect to Mr. Nasca, reflects Senior Executive SERP actuarial present value of accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/17 less 6% for each year under age 62 and proportionately reduced for each year of service under 15 years.

 

With respect to Mr. Connerton, reflects Defined Benefit Pension Plan (“Pension Plan”) actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2017 and actuarial present value under the Executive Incentive Retirement Plan (“EIRP”) based on current vested benefit.

 

With respect to Mr. Miller, reflects Pension Plan and Legacy SERP actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/17.



(2) With respect to Mr. Nasca, reflects (a) lump sum employment contract payout, (b) estimated value of healthcare benefits for 36 months, and (c) Senior Executive SERP actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2017 less 6% for each year under age 62 and proportionately reduced for each year of service under 15 years. 

 

With respect to Mr. Connerton, reflects (a) lump sum Executive Severance Plan payout, (b) Pension Plan  actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2017 and (c) EIRP actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2017 based on current vested benefit.

 

With respect to Mr. Miller, reflects (a) lump sum Executive Severance Agreement payout, and (b) Pension Plan and Legacy SERP actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2017.

 

(3)  With respect to Mr. Nasca, reflects (a) lump sum employment contract payout, (b) estimated value of healthcare benefits for 36 months, (c) Senior Executive SERP actuarial calculated as the projected benefit obligation and (d) intrinsic value of stock awards and option awards that provide for accelerated vesting upon termination for the stated reason.

 

With respect to Mr. Connerton, reflects (a) lump sum change in control agreement payout, (b) EIRP payout, including the present value of expected benefits through age 65, (c) Pension Plan actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2017  and (d) intrinsic value of stock awards and option awards that provide for accelerated vesting upon termination for the stated reason. 

 

With respect to Mr. Miller, reflects (a) lump sum change in control agreement payout, (b) Legacy SERP payout calculated as the accumulated benefit obligation, assuming payment in a single lump sum regardless of individual elections to receive payment over time, (c) Pension Plan actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2017, and (d) intrinsic value of stock awards and option awards that provide for accelerated vesting upon termination for the stated reason.

 

(4)  With respect to Mr. Nasca, reflects (a) Executive Life Insurance Plan lump sum death benefit, (b) estimated value of healthcare benefits for 24 months, (c) Senior Executive SERP lump sum payout calculated as the accumulated benefit obligation, and (d) intrinsic value of stock awards and option awards that provide for accelerated vesting upon termination for the stated reason. 

 

With respect to Mr. Connerton, reflects (a) Executive Life Insurance Plan lump sum death benefit, (b) EIRP actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2017 based on current vested benefit, (c) Pension Plan  actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2017 and (d) intrinsic value of stock awards and option awards that provide for accelerated vesting upon termination for the stated reason.

 

With respect to Mr. Miller, reflects (a) Executive Life Insurance Plan lump sum death benefit, (b) Legacy SERP payout calculated as the accumulated benefit obligation, assuming payment in a single lump sum regardless of individual elections to receive payment over time, (c) Pension Plan  actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2017 and (d) intrinsic value of stock awards and option awards that provide for accelerated vesting upon termination for the stated reason.

 

(5)  Payment may be postponed for a six month period to avoid application of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

36

 


 

All post-termination payments under Mr. Nasca’s employment contract are linked to two-year confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation obligations.  Payments under the change in control agreements with Mr. Miller and Mr. Connerton are linked to one-year confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation obligations.  The events that constitute “cause,” “good reason,” “disability” and “change in control” are described in the employment contract or change in control agreement with each NEO.  Accelerated vesting of stock options and restricted stock awards assumes the awards are not converted into comparable awards with respect to voting securities of the surviving or acquiring entity upon a change in control of the Company, in accordance with the terms of the 2009 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End. The following table provides information about unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock outstanding for the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2017.  

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

Name

 

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable

 

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable
(#) (1)

 

Option Exercise Price

 

Option Expiration Date

 

Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested
(#) (1)

 

Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested
(2)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

David Nasca

 

-    

 

4,150 

 

$

39.50 

 

3/22/2027

 

2,020 

 

$

84,638 



 

2,075 

 

6,225 

 

 

25.00 

 

3/16/2026

 

2,280 

 

 

95,532 



 

3,360 

 

3,360 

 

 

24.72 

 

3/17/2025

 

1,425 

 

 

59,708 



 

3,502 

 

1,168 

 

 

22.93 

 

4/24/2024

 

568 

 

 

23,799 



 

6,100 

 

-    

 

 

17.64 

 

3/19/2023

 

-    

 

 

-    



 

10,380 

 

-    

 

 

15.50 

 

5/4/2022

 

-    

 

 

-    



 

8,980 

 

-    

 

 

14.00 

 

3/15/2021

 

-    

 

 

-    



 

24,170 

 

-    

 

 

12.99 

 

8/18/2019

 

-    

 

 

-    



 

5,000 

 

-    

 

 

15.35 

 

6/17/2018

 

-    

 

 

-    



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John Connerton

 

-    

 

1,500 

 

$

39.50 

 

3/22/2027

 

730 

 

$

30,587 



 

775 

 

2,325 

 

 

25.00 

 

3/16/2026

 

848 

 

 

35,531 



 

855 

 

855 

 

 

24.72 

 

3/17/2025

 

365 

 

 

15,294 



 

1,042 

 

348 

 

 

22.93 

 

4/24/2024

 

168 

 

 

7,039 



 

1,460 

 

-    

 

 

17.64 

 

3/19/2023

 

-    

 

 

-    



 

3,000 

 

-    

 

 

15.50 

 

5/4/2022

 

-    

 

 

-    



 

2,160 

 

-    

 

 

14.00 

 

3/15/2021

 

-    

 

 

-    



 

4,860 

 

-    

 

 

12.99 

 

8/182019

 

-    

 

 

-    



 

2,500 

 

-    

 

 

15.35 

 

6/17/2018

 

-    

 

 

-    



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert Miller, Jr.

 

-    

 

2,170 

 

$

39.50 

 

3/22/2027

 

1,060 

 

$

44,414 



 

1,112 

 

3,338 

 

 

25.00 

 

3/16/2026

 

1,223 

 

 

51,244 



 

1,900 

 

1,900 

 

 

24.72 

 

3/17/2025

 

805 

 

 

33,730 



 

2,107 

 

703 

 

 

22.93 

 

4/24/2024

 

793 

 

 

33,227 



 

3,640 

 

-    

 

 

17.64 

 

3/19/2023

 

-    

 

 

-    



 

7,150 

 

-    

 

 

15.50 

 

5/4/2022

 

-    

 

 

-    



 

6,450 

 

-    

 

 

14.00 

 

3/15/2021

 

-    

 

 

-    



 

11,340 

 

-    

 

 

12.99 

 

8/18/2019

 

-    

 

 

-    

 

(1) The unexercisable options with the following expiration dates and the related unvested restricted shares will vest as indicated below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Compensation

(1)Reflects the aggregate fair value of the awards at grant date as determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for financial statement reporting purposes. For additional information as to the assumptions made in valuation, see Note 14 to the financial statements filed with the SEC in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023. Amounts shown in the table do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that may be realized by the NEOs.

(2)See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Executive Total Compensation – Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation” for additional detail.

(3)With respect to Mr. Nasca, includes the aggregate change in the accumulated benefits under the Bank’s Senior Executive SERP. 

With respect to Mr. Connerton, includes the aggregate change in the accumulated benefits under the Bank’s Defined Benefit Pension Plan. For 2023, the aggregate change in actuarial present value of accumulated benefits for Mr. Connerton was an increase of $3,492.

(4)For 2023, includes: 401(k) matching contributions of $19,800, $16,383, and $13,289 for Mr. Nasca, Mr. Connerton, and Mr. Pawlak respectively; club dues for Mr. Nasca and Mr. Pawlak of $21,338, and $10,190, respectively; the Company’s contribution to the EIRP for Mr. Connerton and Mr. Pawlak of $28,523 and 18,832, respectively; the economic benefit of an endorsement split-dollar life insurance policy held by the Bank; dividends paid on unvested restricted stock awards; and auto allowances for Mr. Nasca, Mr. Connerton, and Mr. Pawlak. Other than the items for which specified dollar amounts were provided, none of the items specified in this footnote (4) exceeded $10,000 for any individual NEO.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards. The following table reflects the terms of the compensation plan-based awards granted to Named Executive Officers in 2023.

Grants of Plan Based Awards 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)

 

All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units

 

All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options

 

 

Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards (per share)
(2)

 

 

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
(3)

Name

 

Grant Date

 

 

Threshold

 

 

Target

 

 

Stretch

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

David J. Nasca

 

3/21/2023

 

$

137,881 

 

$

196,931 

 

$

256,040 

 

4,788 

 

-    

 

 

-    

 

$

169,926 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-    

 

-    

 

$

-    

 

$

-    

John B. Connerton

 

3/21/2023

 

$

51,975 

 

$

74,250 

 

$

96,525 

 

1,877 

 

-    

 

 

-    

 

$

66,615 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-    

 

-    

 

$

-    

 

$

-    

Kenneth D. Pawlak

 

3/21/2023

 

$

51,030 

 

$

72,900 

 

$

94,770 

 

1,725 

 

-    

 

 

-    

 

$

61,220 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-    

 

-    

 

$

-    

 

$

-    

(1)Values reflect possible payouts assuming both Company and individual performance at the specified levels under the Evans Excels Plan.

(2)No options were granted during 2023.

(3)Reflects full grant date fair value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of the stock granted. For additional information as to the assumptions made in valuation, see Note 14 to the financial statements filed with the SEC in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023. 

The restricted stock units in 2023 were granted under the Company’s 2019 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan. 16.5% of the restricted stock units will vest each year on the anniversary of the grant date; 50% of the restricted stock units will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date depending on company performance; both time and performance restricted stock units are subject to acceleration of vesting upon the individual’s death, disability, retirement, or involuntary termination in connection with a change in control. The awards shown in the table above for Messrs. Nasca, Connerton

54


and Pawlak will be fully vested in 2026. No dividends are paid on unvested stock units when and as declared by the Board of Directors.

Employment and Change in Control Agreements with our NEOs

Mr. Nasca is the only NEO with an employment contract. Mr. Connerton and Mr. Pawlak are employed on an “at will” basis but are party to a change in control agreement with the Company.

The material terms of Mr. Nasca’s employment contract are as follows:

David J. Nasca – Employment Agreement, by and among Mr. Nasca, the Company and the Bank, pursuant to which Mr. Nasca serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank. On September 21, 2020, the Committee and Mr. Nasca agreed to a first amendment of Mr. Nasca’s Employment Agreement. With the first amendment, the terms of contract and non-renewal notice were updated. The sub-areas of payments upon an event of termination, disability, death or retirement; notice of termination, post-termination obligations, confidentiality, and source of payments and intended compliance were further clarified from the original agreement. The first amendment stated that Mr. Nasca’s employment period, under the first amendment, began on October 27, 2019 and will continue for a period of thirty-six (36) months, that is until October 27, 2022, unless Mr. Nasca and the Committee agree that the employment period shall end on an earlier date. Also, effective as of October 27, 2022, Mr. Nasca’s employment period will continue on October 27, 2022 for a period of one (1) year and renew daily so that at all times Mr. Nasca has a remaining one (1) year term, except in the case of a non-renewal notice, and the employment period would expire and the employment agreement would terminate on October 27, 2025, unless Mr. Nasca and the Committee agree that the employment period shall end on an earlier date.

Under the first amendment, there are two methods of a non-renewal notice. Under the first method, the Committee may give Mr. Nasca written notice of non-renewal of the employment period for one (1) year term beginning on October 27, 2022 whereby the employment period shall end on the date that is one (1) year after the date of the non-renewal notice. Under the second method, Mr. Nasca may give the Committee written notice of non-renewal of the employment period for one (1) year term beginning on October 27, 2022 whereby the employment period would end on the date that is one (1) year after the date of the non-renewal notice. Both non-renewal notice situations do not render Mr. Nasca eligible in any way for a severance agreement or payment that was clarified in the first amendment and explained below.

Mr. Nasca’s employment agreement provides for an initial base salary, which is adjusted annually by the Board of Directors of Evans Bank, N.A., provided, however, that Mr. Nasca’s annual salary may not be decreased. Mr. Nasca is entitled to participate in all Company and Bank cash and equity incentive programs made available to senior executives, as well as all employee benefit plans, programs, and arrangements for which he qualifies. He is entitled to five weeks paid vacation each year, plus five sick days and customary bank holidays. The Bank provides Mr. Nasca with a monthly automobile allowance of $750 and reimburses him for reasonable club dues and certain other expenses he incurs in the performance of his duties under the agreement.

Within the first amendment, payments to Mr. Nasca upon an event of termination were clarified as stated below:

Effective through and including October 27, 2022, by the Company or the Bank without “cause” or by Mr. Nasca for “good reason,” or under certain circumstances within two years following a “change in control” of the Company or in the event of his subsequent death, he (or his beneficiaries or estate) will be paid three times the sum of the highest base salary paid to him at any time under the employment agreement plus the average annual non-equity incentive bonus paid to Mr. Nasca in the three years prior to termination. The Company will also continue to provide amounts or benefits payable under applicable benefit plans for 36 months. Mr. Nasca’s change in control benefits may be reduced by the minimum amount necessary to avoid penalties under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code;

If an Event of Termination occurs after October 27, 2022, by the Company or the Bank without “cause” or by Mr. Nasca for “good reason”, he will be paid the sum of the highest base salary paid to him at any time under the employment agreement and the average annual non-equity incentive bonus paid to Mr. Nasca in the three years prior to termination. If the event of termination is made in connection with an involuntary termination of employment or voluntary resignation for “good reason” within two years after a change of control under certain conditions, then Mr. Nasca is paid two times the sum of the highest annual rate of base salary paid to him at any time under the agreement and the average annual incentive bonus paid to him during the three completed calendar years preceding the event of termination with such payment conditioned upon Mr. Nasca signing a general release acceptable to the Company. The Company will also continue to provide amounts or benefits payable under applicable benefit plans for 12 months.

55


Executive Compensation

Termination because of “disability,” (i) Mr. Nasca will be entitled to participate in the short- and long-term disability plans and benefits offered by the Bank to senior executives, including long-term disability income replacement benefits and supplemental retirement benefits under a long-term disability program; and (ii) the Bank will continue to provide Mr. Nasca with certain life and medical insurance benefits under the same cost-sharing arrangement as in effect for active employees until Mr. Nasca’s (A) full-time employment by another employer, (B) attaining age 65, or (C) death.

Termination by the Company or the Bank for “cause” or by Mr. Nasca other than for “good reason,” Mr. Nasca will not be entitled to payment of any amounts or benefits, other than that portion of his annual salary accrued through the date of termination and any accrued and unpaid vacation.

An “event of termination” does not mean non-renewal of the employment agreement by the Committee or Mr. Nasca.

The Company’s or the Bank’s obligation to make such payments to Mr. Nasca are conditioned upon this compliance with his obligations of confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation set forth in the employment agreement.

John Connerton and Kenneth Pawlak: The terms of post termination compensation for Mr. Connerton and Mr. Pawlak may fall within one of two benefits depending on the conditions of the termination.  In no circumstance would Mr. Connerton and Mr. Pawlak be entitled to a payment under a change in control agreement and the Executive Severance Plan.  To be entitled for a payment under a Change of Control Agreement, there must be a change in control of the Company followed by a qualifying termination of employment. To be entitled to a payment under the Executive Severance Plan, there must be a qualifying termination of employment and a change in control of the Company has not occurred.  The following is a description of the Change in Control Agreements and Executive Severance Plan.

Change in Control Agreements. The Company entered into a two-year change in control agreement with each of Mr. Connerton and Mr. Pawlak. The agreements provide that in the event of a change in control during the term of the agreement, followed by the executive’s termination without cause or voluntary termination for good reason, the executive would be entitled to: (1) a cash lump sum payment equal to two times the highest rate of gross base salary earned during the prior 12 months; and (2) continued life insurance and non-taxable medical and dental coverage (under the same cost sharing arrangement) substantially comparable to the coverage maintained by the Bank for the person as of his date of termination for 24 months thereafter.

Executive Severance Plan. Messrs. Connerton and Pawlak are participants in the Company’s Executive Severance Plan. Under the Executive Severance Plan, a participant (1) whose employment is involuntarily terminated by the Company for reasons other than for cause, as defined in the plan, (2) who is required to move employment more than 35 miles from his or her current place of employment, and who rejects the relocation and terminates employment, or (3) whose aggregate compensation is materially reduced, and who terminates employment, will be eligible for severance payments under the Executive Severance Plan. Under the plan, a participant eligible for benefits would receive 12 months of salary continuance plus the participant’s short-term incentive amount at the target level, pro-rated for the time during the year in which the participant was actively employed by the Company. The severance payments will be made over the 12-month period following termination in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll cycle. In addition, the Company will reimburse eligible participants for up to $5,000 in outplacement services during the 12-month period following termination (payable in a lump sum, in cash). Payments and benefits under the Executive Severance Plan are subject to the participant’s compliance with one-year non-competition and non-solicitation covenants, and an employee will cease to be a participant in this plan if severance benefits are triggered under an employment contract or change in control agreement.  In the event Messrs. Connerton and Pawlak are eligible for a payment under the Executive Severance Plan, the executives would not be entitled to a payment under their change in control agreements.  Mr. Nasca is not a participant in the Executive Severance Plan.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control. The following table shows the potential incremental value transfer to each remaining 2023 NEO under various termination or change-in-control scenarios as of December 30, 2023, the last business day of fiscal 2023. Unvested, unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock awards are valued at the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on that date. The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such NEO’s separation from the Company. The amounts shown in the following table do not take into account any reductions that may be required in order to avoid penalties under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.

56


Executive Compensation



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Event

 

David Nasca

 

John Connerton

 

Kenneth Pawlak



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retirement or Voluntary Termination Without "Good Reason" (1)

 

$

2,083,336 

 

$

243,322 

 

$

81,556 

Termination for "Cause" (1)

 

$

2,083,336 

 

$

243,322 

 

$

81,556 

Termination Without "Cause" or for "Good Reason" (2)(5)

 

$

4,354,373 

 

$

592,572 

 

$

446,326 

"Change in Control" Termination (3)(5)

 

$

5,492,477 

 

$

1,052,528 

 

$

833,187 

Death (4)(5)

 

$

4,303,933 

 

$

939,985 

 

$

757,419 

Disability (6)

 

$

3,263,808 

 

$

502,528 

 

$

293,187 

(1)With respect to Mr. Nasca, reflects Senior Executive SERP actuarial present value of accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/23.  

With respect to Mr. Connerton, reflects Defined Benefit Pension Plan (“Pension Plan”) actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2023 and actuarial present value under the Executive Incentive Retirement Plan (“EIRP”) based on current vested benefit.

(2)With respect to Mr. Nasca, reflects (a) lump sum employment contract payout, (b) estimated value of healthcare benefits for 36 months, and (c) Senior Executive SERP actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2023.  

With respect to Mr. Connerton, reflects (a) lump sum Executive Severance Plan payout, (b) Pension Plan actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2023 and (c) EIRP actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2023 based on current vested benefit.

With respect to Mr. Connerton, reflects (a) lump sum Executive Severance Plan payout, (b) EIRP actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2023 based on current vested benefit.

 (3)With respect to Mr. Nasca, reflects (a) lump sum employment contract payout, (b) estimated value of healthcare benefits for 36 months, (c) Senior Executive SERP actuarial calculated as the projected benefit obligation and (d) value of stock awards and option awards that provide for accelerated vesting upon termination for the stated reason. 

With respect to Mr. Connerton, reflects (a) lump sum change in control agreement payout, (b) EIRP payout, including the present value of expected benefits through age 65, (c) Pension Plan actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2023 and (d) value of stock awards and option awards that provide for accelerated vesting upon termination for the stated reason.

With respect to Mr. Pawlak,  (a) lump sum change in control agreement payout, (b) value of stock awards and option awards that provide for accelerated vesting upon termination for the stated reason.

(4)With respect to Mr. Nasca, reflects (a) Executive Life Insurance Plan lump sum death benefit, (b) estimated value of healthcare benefits for 24 months, (c) Senior Executive SERP lump sum payout calculated as the accumulated benefit obligation, and (d) value of stock awards and option awards that provide for accelerated vesting upon termination for the stated reason.

With respect to Mr. Connerton, reflects (a) Executive Life Insurance Plan lump sum death benefit, (b) EIRP actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2023 based on current vested benefit, (c) Pension Plan actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2023 and (d) value of stock awards and option awards that provide for accelerated vesting upon termination for the stated reason.

With respect to Mr. Pawlak,  (a) Executive Life Insurance Plan lump sum death benefit, (b) EIRP actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2023 based on current vested benefit, and (c) value of stock awards and option awards that provide for accelerated vesting upon termination for the stated reason.  

(5)Payment may be postponed for a six-month period to avoid application of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

(6)With respect to Mr. Nasca, reflects (a) estimated value of healthcare benefits for 24 months, (b) Senior Executive SERP lump sum payout calculated as the benefit obligation, and (c) value of stock awards and option awards that provide for accelerated vesting upon termination for the stated reason.

With respect to Mr. Connerton, reflects (a) EIRP actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2023 based on current vested benefit, (b) Pension Plan actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2023, and (c) value of stock awards and option awards that provide for accelerated vesting upon termination for the stated reason. 

With respect to Mr. Pawlak, reflects (a) EIRP actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation as of 12/31/2023 based on current vested benefit, and (b) value of stock awards and option awards that provide for accelerated vesting upon termination for the stated reason.

All post-termination payments under Mr. Nasca’s employment contract are linked to two-year confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation obligations. Payments under the change in control agreements with Mr. Connerton and Mr. Pawlak are linked to one-year confidentiality, and non-solicitation obligations. The events that constitute “cause,” “good reason,” “disability” and “change in control” are described in the employment contract or change in control agreement with each NEO. Accelerated vesting of stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units assumes the awards are not converted into comparable awards with respect to voting securities of the surviving or acquiring entity upon a change in control of the Company, in accordance with the terms of the 2019 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan.

57


Executive Compensation

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End. The following table provides information about unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock outstanding for the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2023.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable

 

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable
(#) (1)

 

Option Exercise Price

 

Option Expiration Date

 

Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested
(#) (1) (2)

 

Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested
(3)

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

David J. Nasca

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,788 

 

$

150,966 

 



 

2,644 

 

2,646 

 

$

39.06 

 

11/16/2031

 

3,530 

 

 

111,301 

 



 

7,259 

 

4,841 

 

 

25.51 

 

11/17/2030

 

1,585 

 

 

49,975 

 



 

6,600 

 

-    

 

 

36.12 

 

4/15/2029

 

1,940 

 

 

61,168 

 



 

4,520 

 

-    

 

 

45.20 

 

3/20/2028

 

-    

 

 

-    

 



 

4,150 

 

-    

 

 

39.50 

 

3/22/2027

 

-    

 

 

-    

 



 

8,300 

 

-    

 

 

25.00 

 

3/16/2026

 

-    

 

 

-    

 



 

6,720 

 

-    

 

 

24.72 

 

3/17/2025

 

-    

 

 

-    

 



 

4,670 

 

-    

 

 

22.93 

 

4/24/2024

 

-    

 

 

-    

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John B. Connerton

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,877 

 

$

59,182 

 



 

1,035 

 

1,035 

 

$

39.06 

 

11/16/2031

 

1,384 

 

 

43,638 

 



 

2,808 

 

1,872 

 

 

25.51 

 

11/17/2030

 

620 

 

 

19,549 

 



 

2,520 

 

-    

 

 

36.12 

 

4/15/2029

 

752 

 

 

23,711 

 



 

1,640 

 

-    

 

 

45.20 

 

3/20/2028

 

-    

 

 

-    

 



 

1,500 

 

-    

 

 

39.50 

 

3/22/2027

 

-    

 

 

-    

 



 

-    

 

-    

 

 

25.00 

 

3/16/2026

 

-    

 

 

-    

 



 

-    

 

-    

 

 

24.72 

 

3/17/2025

 

-    

 

 

-    

 



 

-    

 

-    

 

 

22.93 

 

4/24/2024

 

-    

 

 

-    

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kenneth D. Pawlak

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,725 

 

$

54,389 

 



 

935 

 

935 

 

$

39.06 

 

11/16/2031

 

1,249 

 

 

39,381 

 



 

2,532 

 

1,688 

 

 

25.51 

 

11/17/2030

 

560 

 

 

17,657 

 



 

2,280 

 

-    

 

 

36.12 

 

4/15/2029

 

676 

 

 

21,314 

 



 

1,310 

 

-    

 

 

45.20 

 

3/21/2028

 

-    

 

 

-    

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The unexercisable options with the following expiration dates and the related unvested restricted shares and units will vest as indicated below:



 

Expiration Date

Vesting Schedule

11/17/2030

20% each on November 17, 2024 and 2025

11/16/2031

25% each on November 16, 2024 and 2025



 

 

 

 

(2)

Restricted units with no related option expiration date will vest 33% each on March 15, 2024,  and 2025.  Restricted performance units with no related option expiration date will vest 100% on March 15, 2025.   

(3)

Expiration Date

Vesting Schedule

4/24/2024

100% each on April 24, 2018

3/17/2025

50% each on March 17, 2018 and 2019

3/15/2026

33% each on March 15, 2018, 2019 and 2020

3/22/2027

25% each on March 22, 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021

(2) The market value of stock awards was computed by multiplying the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 20172023 by the number of shares covered by the award.

37


Option Exercises and Stock Vested.  The following table provides information about option exercises and the vesting of restricted stock during 2017 for the Named Executive Officers. 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise

 

Value Realized on Exercise

 

Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting

 

Value Realized on Vesting (1)

David Nasca

 

-    

 

$

-    

 

2,678 

 

$

102,041 

John Connerton

 

-    

 

$

-    

 

785 

 

$

29,948 

Robert G. Miller, Jr.

 

-    

 

$

-    

 

1,567 

 

$

59,602 

(1)  Calculated by multiplying the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the vesting date by the number of shares vested.

Pension Benefits.  The following table sets forth the present value of the accumulated pension benefits for the Named Executive Officers as of fiscal year-end 2017. 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Plan Name

 

Number of Years Credited Service

 

 

Present Value of Accumulated Benefit (1)

 

Payments During Last Fiscal Year

David J. Nasca

 

Senior Executive SERP

 

11 

 

$

1,129,305 

 

$

-    



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John Connerton

 

Defined Benefit Plan

 

14 

 

$

38,278 

 

$

-    



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert G. Miller, Jr.

 

Legacy SERP

 

17 

 

$

1,781,508 

 

$

-    



 

Defined Benefit Plan

 

17 

 

 

183,491 

 

 

-    

(1) The assumptions used to calculate the present value of accumulated benefits are set forth in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

The following describes the material factors necessary to understand the pension benefits that are provided to the Named Executive Officers under the Bank's defined benefit pension and supplemental executive retirement plans.

Defined Benefit Pension Plan.  The Bank maintains a defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Plan”) for all eligible employees, including employees of its subsidiaries.  Mr. Miller and Mr. Connerton are participants in the Pension Plan.  Upon retirement at age 65, vested participants are entitled to receive a monthly benefit.  The following table indicates the annual retirement benefit that would be payable under the Pension Plan, pursuant to the amended benefit formula discussed below, upon retirement at age 65 in fiscal year 2017, expressed in the form of a single life annuity for the average annual earnings and years of credited service.  The benefits listed below are not subject to deduction for Social Security or other offset amounts.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Years of Service at Normal Retirement

Final Average Compensation

 

10 

 

20 

 

30 

 

40 
$30,000 

 

$3,000 

 

$6,000 

 

$9,000 

 

$9,000 
$50,000 

 

$5,000 

 

$10,000 

 

$15,000 

 

$15,000 
$100,000 

 

$10,000 

 

$20,000 

 

$30,000 

 

$30,000 
$150,000 

 

$15,000 

 

$30,000 

 

$45,000 

 

$45,000 
$220,000 

 

$22,000 

 

$44,000 

 

$66,000 

 

$66,000 

Pension Benefit Formula: 1% of compensation times years of service, subject to a maximum of 30 years of service.

38


Prior to an amendment to the Pension Plan, effective May 1, 1994, the monthly benefit under the Pension Plan was 3% of average monthly compensation multiplied by years of service up to a maximum of 15 years of service.  In 1994, the Pension Plan was amended to change the benefit to 1% of average monthly compensation (as defined under the Pension Plan, generally the highest five consecutive compensation years out of the latest ten compensation years at retirement) multiplied by years of service up to a maximum of 30 years of service.

Effective January 31, 2008, the Pension Plan was frozen.  All participants vested immediately in the Pension Plan at their then-present number of years of service, regardless of whether an employee had attained greater than five years of service on January 31, 2008.  All benefits that eligible participants accrued in the Pension Plan prior to January 31, 2008 will be retained, but no additional benefits have accrued under the Pension Plan since that date.  Employees will be eligible to receive accrued benefits at normal retirement age.

"Compensation" for purposes of the Pension Plan generally means the compensation reported for a participant on Form W-2 as gross pay.  In calculating a participant's benefit, annual compensation in excess of a limit set annually by the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States may not be considered.  That limit (the "IRS Compensation Limit") was $230,000 for 2008, the final year of the Pension Plan.  In addition, benefits provided under the Pension Plan may not exceed a benefit limit under the Internal Revenue Code (which was $185,000 payable as a single life annuity beginning at normal retirement age in 2008).  The "Social Security Wage Base" is the maximum amount of annual earnings or wages that is subject to the old age, survivors and disability insurance taxes that is in effect under the Social Security Act at the beginning of the plan year.

A participant is eligible for early retirement under the Pension Plan if the participant retires before normal retirement age but after attaining age 59 and completing 5 years of service.  An early retirement benefit is reduced 1/15th per year for each year that the benefit commences prior to normal retirement age.  As of the date of this Proxy Statement, Mr. Miller (age 61) is eligible for early retirement but Mr. Connerton (age 51) is not eligible.  Mr. Nasca has not been a participant in the Pension Plan.

Benefits under the Pension Plan are paid over the lifetime of the participant or the lifetimes of the participant and a beneficiary, as elected by the participant.  If the participant is married on the date payments are to begin under the Pension Plan, payment will be in the form of a joint and 50% survivor annuity with the spouse as beneficiary, unless the participant elects another form of payment with the consent of the spouse.  If benefits are paid in a form in which a benefit is to be paid to a beneficiary after the death of the participant, benefits are reduced from the amount payable as a lifetime benefit solely to the participant in accordance with the actuarial factors that apply to all participants in the Pension Plan.  The Pension Plan generally does not make distributions in the form of a one-time lump sum payment.  A participant's benefit is payable as an annuity with monthly benefit payments, unless the present value of the normal retirement benefit is less than $5,000.

Benefits under the Pension Plan are funded by an irrevocable, tax-exempt trust.  The Pension Plan benefits of all participants, including those benefits of NEOs, are payable from the assets held by the tax-exempt trust.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans.  The Bank maintains the Legacy SERP in which Mr. Miller is a participant.  The Legacy SERP historically was available to executives deemed eligible by the Committee in its sole discretion, but is currently closed to new participants.  Under the Legacy SERP, Mr. Miller is entitled to an annual benefit payment equal to 70% of his final average earnings (defined as salary and annual short-term cash incentive bonus, including the amount of any salary deferrals into the Company’s 401(k) and employee benefit plans), currently defined as the highest average of five consecutive years out of the last ten worked, reduced by 50% of his annual Social Security benefit, the amount of his annual benefit under the Pension Plan, and the value of his annual benefit attributable to employer matching contributions to the Bank’s 401(k) plan, at or after attaining age 65.  There are provisions for reduced early retirement benefits after attaining age 60 but prior to age 65, provided, however, that such benefits are reduced by 2% for each year by which the participant's age and years of service are less than 75.  Mr. Miller

39


is currently eligible for early retirement under the Legacy SERP.  Benefits are also payable upon separation from service after a change in control, regardless of the participant’s age.  Upon a participant’s entitlement to a benefit under the Legacy SERP, his benefit shall be paid in the form of either (i) a single life annuity with 15 payments guaranteed, or (ii) a lump sum payment which is actuarially equivalent to the annuity form of payment described in clause (i).  The Legacy SERP also allows for payment of such benefit to a designated beneficiary upon the death of the employee and for earlier payment due to disability. 

Mr. Nasca is a participant in the Senior Executive SERP.  The Senior Executive SERP is available to senior executives deemed eligible by the Committee in its sole discretion.  A participant is generally entitled to receive a benefit under the Senior Executive SERP upon a termination of employment, other than for “cause,” after the participant has completed 10 full calendar years of service with the Bank.  No benefit is payable under the Senior Executive SERP if the participant’s employment is terminated for “cause” or if the participant voluntarily terminates before completing 10 full calendar years of service with the Bank.   In addition, the payment of benefits under the Senior Executive SERP is conditioned upon certain agreements of the participant related to confidentiality, cooperation, non-competition, and non-solicitation.

A participant will be entitled to a retirement benefit under the Senior Executive SERP if his or her employment with the Bank terminates other than for “cause” on or after the date the participant attains age 65.  The “accrued benefit” is based on a percentage of the participant’s final average earnings (defined as salary and annual short-term cash incentive bonus, including the amount of any salary deferrals into the Company’s 401(k) and employee benefit plans), which is determined based upon the participant’s total annual compensation over the highest consecutive five calendar years of the participant’s employment with the Bank, accrued over the participant’s “required benefit service”.  Mr. Nasca’s benefit percentage is 35% and his required benefit service is 15 years.  A reduced early retirement benefit may be payable if the participant terminates before attaining age 62 (other than by reason of death of “disability” or following a “change in control”).  The benefit is calculated in the same manner as the standard retirement benefit, but is reduced by 6% for each full calendar year prior to age 62 that the benefit is paid (e.g., reduced by 12% if the participant retires at age 60).  Mr. Nasca is currently eligible for early retirement under the Senior Executive SERP.

Upon a participant’s death while employed by the Bank, the participant’s designated beneficiary will be entitled to a cash lump sum equal to the present value of the participant’s “accrued benefit”, without any reduction for early retirement.  If a participant’s employment with the Bank terminates by reason of “disability”, the participant is entitled to a benefit to be calculated as if he or she had attained age 65 immediately before the disability and assuming his or her base salary had increased 3% each calendar year, then discounted to the lump sum present value as of the date of disability, and paid as a cash lump sum.  If a participant’s employment is terminated without “cause” or the participant terminates with “good reason” (as defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 409A) within 24 months following a “change in control”, the participant is entitled to a benefit to be calculated as if he or she had attained age 65 immediately before termination and assuming his or her base salary had increased 3% each calendar year, then discounted to the lump sum present value and paid as a cash lump sum.

Executive Life Insurance Plan.  The Company provides an endorsement split-dollar benefit to certain officers and directors in connection with bank-owned life insurance maintained by the Bank.  This benefit does not carry into retirement.  The benefit for all non-employee directors is in the amount of $200,000.  The amount of the benefit for NEOs is 2.0 times base salary.  For 2017, the amount of the benefits for each of Messrs. Nasca, Connerton and Miller was $920,000, $400,000 and $542,000, respectively.  The participant annually pays income tax on the imputed value of annual term life insurance premiums.

Employee Savings Plan.  The Bank also maintains a 401(k) salary deferral plan to assist employees, including employees of its subsidiaries, in saving for retirement.  All employees are eligible to participate on the first of the month following 30 days of employment.  Eligible employees can contribute up to the maximum amount allowable under the Internal Revenue Code. 

For 2017, all employees, including the NEOs, received a 100% match from the Company on contributions up to 6% of base salary.  Employees are fully vested in these employer contributions after six years of

40


service.  Matching contributions credited to the accounts of NEOs are included in the “Summary Compensation Table,” above, under “All Other Compensation.”

Individual account earnings will depend on the performance of the particular funds in which the participant invests.  Specific guidelines govern adjustments to contribution levels, investment decisions and withdrawals from the plan.  The benefit is paid as an annuity unless the employee elects one of the optional forms of payment available under the plan.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation.  The following table sets forth information for the Company’s Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan for fiscal 2017:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year

 

Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year

 

Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End

John Connerton

 

$

-    

 

$

224 

 

$

4,947 

Robert G. Miller, Jr.

 

$

5,416 

 

$

4,388 

 

$

96,772 

The Company does not make contributions to the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.  Mr. Miller’s contributions were reported as compensation for fiscal 2017 in the Summary Compensation Table, above, and amounts reported in the “Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End” column of this table for Messrs. Miller and Connerton were reported as compensation in the Company’s Summary Compensation Tables for previous fiscal years. Mr. Connerton did not contribute to this plan in fiscal 2017.  Mr. Nasca does not participate in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. 

The Company's Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan allows NEOs to elect to defer 1% to 100% of their base salary until retirement or termination of service.  The Company credits such deferrals with interest equal to 1% over the prime rate as of each January 1st. 

NEOs are immediately 100% vested in their account balance under the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, including credited interest.  NEOs may choose from a 5, 10 or 15 year payment plan or lump sum payment option.  In 2016, the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan was frozen to all new entrants.  Mr. Miller and Mr. Connerton, who were participants in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan when it was frozen to new entrants, are permitted to continue their participation in the plan, but neither Mr. Nasca nor any future NEOs will be eligible to participate in this plan.

CEO Pay Ratio. The “CEO pay ratio”, which shows the relationship between the total compensation paid to our CEO and the total compensation paid to our median employee, may provide an additional insight to the Company’s compensation practices.   As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and applicable SEC rules, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation our CEO:

58


Executive Compensation

Option Exercises and Stock Vested. The following table provides information about option exercises and the vesting of restricted stock during 2023 for the Named Executive Officers.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise

 

Value Realized on Exercise

 

Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting

 

Value Realized on Vesting (1)

David J. Nasca

 

6,100 

 

$

136,335 

 

3,157 

 

$

96,082 

John B. Connerton

 

7,660 

 

$

128,925 

 

1,226 

 

$

37,315 

Kenneth D. Pawlak

 

-    

 

$

-    

 

1,105 

 

$

33,632 

(1)Calculated by multiplying the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the vesting date by the number of shares vested.

Pension Benefits. The following table sets forth the present value of the accumulated pension benefits for the Named Executive Officers as of fiscal year-end 2023.

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Name

  

Plan Name

  

Number of
Years Credited
Service

  

Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit (1)

  

Payments During
Last Fiscal Year

 

 

 

 

 

David J. Nasca

  

Senior Executive SERP

  

17

  

$2,083,336

  

$ —

 

 

 

 

 

John B. Connerton

  

Defined Benefit Plan

  

20

  

$     40,998

  

$ —

(1)The assumptions used to calculate the present value of accumulated benefits are set forth in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.

The following describes the material factors necessary to understand the pension benefits that are provided to the Named Executive Officers under the Bank’s defined benefit pension and supplemental executive retirement plans.

Defined Benefit Pension Plan (Frozen). The Bank maintains a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Plan”) for all eligible employees, including employees of its subsidiaries, and Mr. Connerton is the only NEO that is a participant in the Pension Plan. Effective January 31, 2008, the Pension Plan was frozen. All participants vested immediately in the Pension Plan at their then-present number of years of service, regardless of whether an employee had attained greater than five years of service on January 31, 2008. All benefits that eligible participants accrued in the Pension Plan prior to January 31, 2008 will be retained, but no additional benefits have accrued under the Pension Plan since that date. Employees will be eligible to receive accrued benefits at normal retirement age.

Upon retirement at age 65, vested participants are entitled to receive a monthly benefit. The following table indicates the annual retirement benefit that would be payable under the Pension Plan, upon retirement at age 65 in fiscal year 2023, expressed in the form of a single life annuity for the average annual earnings and years of credited service. The benefits listed below are not subject to deduction for Social Security or other offset amounts.

·

The median annual total compensation of all employees other than the CEO was $54,320.

·

59


Executive Compensation



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Years of Service at Normal Retirement

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Final Average Compensation

  

    10    

 

  

    20    

 

  

    30    

 

  

    40    

 

 

 

 

 

 

$30,000

  

$

3,000 

 

 

$

6,000 

 

 

$

9,000 

 

 

$

9,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$50,000

  

$

5,000 

 

 

$

10,000 

 

 

$

15,000 

 

 

$

15,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$100,000

  

$

10,000 

 

 

$

20,000 

 

 

$

30,000 

 

 

$

30,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$150,000

  

$

15,000 

 

 

$

30,000 

 

 

$

45,000 

 

 

$

45,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$220,000

  

$

22,000 

 

 

$

44,000 

 

 

$

66,000 

 

 

$

66,000 

 

Pension Benefit Formula: 1% of compensation times years of service, subject to a maximum of 30 years of service.

A participant is eligible for early retirement under the Pension Plan if the participant retires before normal retirement age but after attaining age 59 and completing 5 years of service. An early retirement benefit is reduced 1/15th per year for each year that the benefit commences prior to normal retirement age. Mr. Connerton (age 56) is not eligible for early retirement.

Benefits under the Pension Plan are funded by an irrevocable, tax-exempt trust. The Pension Plan benefits of all participants, including those benefits of NEOs, are payable from the assets held by the tax-exempt trust.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. Mr. Nasca is the only participant in the Senior Executive SERP. The Senior Executive SERP is available to senior executives deemed eligible by the Committee in its sole discretion. A participant is generally entitled to receive a benefit under the Senior Executive SERP upon a termination of employment, other than for “cause,” after the participant has completed 10 full calendar years of service with the Bank. No benefit is payable under the Senior Executive SERP if the participant’s employment is terminated for “cause” or if the participant voluntarily terminates before completing 10 full calendar years of service with the Bank.  In addition, the payment of benefits under the Senior Executive SERP is conditioned upon certain agreements of the participant related to confidentiality, cooperation, non-competition, and non-solicitation. A participant will be entitled to a retirement benefit under the Senior Executive SERP if his or her employment with the Bank terminates other than for “cause” on or after the date the participant attains age 65. The “accrued benefit” is based on a percentage of the participant’s final average earnings (defined as salary and annual short-term cash incentive bonus, including the amount of any salary deferrals into the Company’s 401(k) and employee benefit plans), which is determined based upon the participant’s total annual compensation over the highest consecutive five calendar years of the participant’s employment with the Bank, accrued over the participant’s “required benefit service”. Mr. Nasca’s benefit percentage is 35% and his required benefit service is 15 years. Mr. Nasca is currently eligible for a retirement benefit under the Senior Executive SERP.

Upon a participant’s death while employed by the Bank, the participant’s designated beneficiary will be entitled to a cash lump sum equal to the present value of the participant’s “accrued benefit”, without any reduction for early retirement. If a participant’s employment with the Bank terminates by reason of “disability”, the participant is entitled to a benefit to be calculated as if he or she had attained age 65 immediately before the disability and assuming his or her base salary had increased 3% each calendar year, then discounted to the lump sum present value as of the date of disability, and paid as a cash lump sum. If a participant’s employment is terminated without “cause” or the participant terminates with “good reason” (as defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 409A) within 24 months following a “change in control”, the participant is entitled to a benefit to be calculated as if he or she had attained age 65 immediately before termination and assuming his or her base salary had increased 3% each calendar year, then discounted to the lump sum present value and paid as a cash lump sum.

60


Executive Compensation

Executive Life Insurance Plan. The Company provides an endorsement split-dollar benefit to certain officers and directors in connection with bank-owned life insurance maintained by the Bank. This benefit does not carry into retirement. The benefit for all non-employee directors is in the amount of $200,000. The amount of the benefit for NEOs is 2.0 times base salary. For 2023, the amount of the benefits for each of Messrs. Nasca, Connerton and Pawlak was $1,200,000, $550,000 and $540,000, respectively. The participant annually pays income tax on the imputed value of annual term life insurance premiums.

Employee Savings Plan. The Bank also maintains a tax-qualified 401(k) salary deferral plan to assist employees, including employees of its subsidiaries, in saving for retirement. All employees are eligible to participate on the first of the month following 30 days of employment. Eligible employees can contribute up to the maximum amount allowable under the Internal Revenue Code.

For 2023, all employees, including the NEOs, received a 100% match from the Company on contributions up to 6% of base salary. The Company adjusted its 401(k) maximum match to 5% for 2024. Employees are fully vested in these employer contributions after six years of service. Matching contributions credited to the accounts of NEOs are included in the “Summary Compensation Table,” above, under “All Other Compensation.”

Individual account earnings will depend on the performance of the particular funds in which the participant invests. Specific guidelines govern adjustments to contribution levels, investment decisions and withdrawals from the plan. The benefit is paid as an annuity unless the employee elects one of the optional forms of payment available under the plan.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation. The following table sets forth information for the Company’s Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan for fiscal 2023:  



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Name

  

Executive Contributions
in Last Fiscal Year

  

Aggregate
Earnings in Last
Fiscal Year

  

Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions in Last
Fiscal Year

  

Aggregate Balance at
Last Fiscal Year End

 

 

 

 

 

John B. Connerton

  

$ —

  

$260

  

$ —

  

$6,389

The Company does not make contributions to the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. The amount reported in the “Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End” column of this table for Mr. Connerton is reported as compensation in the Company’s Summary Compensation Table for previous fiscal year. Mr. Connerton did not contribute to this plan in fiscal 2023. Mr. Nasca does not participate in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.

The Deferred Compensation Plan allows NEOs to elect to defer 1% to 100% of their base salary until retirement or termination of service. Amounts deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan are credited with interest at the prevailing prime rate, plus 100 basis points.

NEOs are immediately 100% vested in their account balance under the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, including credited interest. NEOs may choose from a 5, 10 or 15 year payment plan or lump sum payment option. In 2016, the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan was frozen to all new entrants. Mr. Connerton, who was a participant in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan when it was frozen to new entrants, is permitted to continue his participation in the plan, and Mr. Nasca is eligible to participate in the plan but has not elected a deferral. Any future NEOs will be eligible to participate in this plan.

61


Executive Compensation

CEO Pay Ratio. The “CEO pay ratio”, which shows the relationship between the annual total compensation paid to our CEO and the annual total compensation paid to our median employee, may provide an additional insight to the Company’s compensation practices.  As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and applicable SEC rules, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation our CEO:

The median annual total compensation of all employees of the Company and its subsidiaries (other than the CEO) was $64,138.  

"

The annual total compensation of the CEO (as reported in the Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement) was $884,999.

·

Based on this information, for 2017 the CEO’s annual total compensation was 16 times that of the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees. 

41


To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and our CEO, we took the following steps:

1.

To identify the “median employee” (ME) from our employee population, we analyzed the entire employee population other than the CEO.  We determined that, as of December 1, 2017, our employee population consisted of 278 individuals, with all of these individuals located in the United States.

2.

All full time, part time, seasonal and temporary workers who worked at least seven days in 2017 and who started on or before December 1, 2017 were included.  The employee population we analyzed included all employees of the Company and all of its consolidated subsidiaries.  We analyzed the amount of salary and wages of our employees as reflected in our payroll records as reported to the Internal Revenue Service on Form W-2 for 2017. In making this determination, we annualized the compensation of all permanent employees (full-time and part-time) who were hired in 2017 but did not work for us for the entire fiscal year.

3.

Once we identified our median employee, we calculated the ME’s total compensation for 2017.  The ME’s 2017 total compensation included the same components as the 2017 total compensation for our CEO as reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table (SCT) included in this Proxy Statement, such as base salary, overtime, annual bonus, referral bonuses, stock award/options, 401(k) matching contributions, and any increase in value of defined benefit pension plans.

4.

The annual total compensation of our CEO used for purposes of calculating the ratio was the amount reported in the “Total” column of the SCT.

5.

The ratio of the CEO’s compensation to the median compensation of all employees other than the CEO was determined by comparing the CEO’s 2017 total compensation to the ME’s 2017 total compensation. 

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

The Company's written policies and procedures with respect to transactions with related persons require the review and approval or ratification by the Audit Committee for any transaction in which the Company will be a participant and any related person has or will have a material interest (direct or indirect), other than transactions involving less than $5,000 when aggregated with all similar transactions.  Related persons include the Company's directors, director nominees and executive officers and their immediate family members, as well as persons owning more than 5% of the Company's common stock and any immediate family member of such shareholder.

Under the Company's Related Person Transaction Policy, a related person transaction may be consummated or continue if the Audit Committee has approved or ratified the transaction in accordance with the following guidelines: in considering whether to approve or ratify related person transactions, the Audit Committee will take into account, among other factors, (i) whether the related person transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm's length dealings with an unrelated third party; (ii) whether the related person transaction has been reviewed and approved by the Company's subsidiary banking institution in accordance with Federal Reserve Regulation O and the process and procedure established by such subsidiary banking institution to ensure compliance with Regulation O; (iii) whether the related person transaction is approved by the disinterested members of the Board of Directors; and (iv) whether the related person transaction involves compensation approved by the Company's Human Resource and Compensation Committee.

The Audit Committee meets annually with management to discuss and review related person transactions for that calendar year, including the proposed aggregate value of such transactions.  After review and discussion, the Audit Committee will determine, based on the above guidelines, whether to approve or ratify each related person transaction, and at each subsequently scheduled meeting, management will update the Audit Committee, as necessary, as to any material change to previously approved related person transactions and any proposed related person transactions.

42


In the event that a related person transaction is proposed during the interim period between regularly scheduled Audit Committee meetings, the transaction may be presented to the Audit Committee by management for approval or preliminarily entered into by management subject to ratification by the Audit Committee in accordance with the above guidelines; provided that if ratification is not forthcoming, management will make all reasonable efforts to cancel or annul the transaction.

The Bank has had, and in the future expects to have, banking and fiduciary transactions with directors and executive officers of the Company and some of their affiliates.  All such transactions have been in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms (including interest rates and collateral on loans) as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated third parties, and do not involve more than a normal risk of collectivity or present other unfavorable features.

43


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The information contained in this Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” or incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with the Company’s management and KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2017 fiscal year.  The Audit Committee has also discussed with KPMG LLP the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding KPMG LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with KPMG LLP its independence from the Company.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its 2017 fiscal year for filing with the SEC.

Submitted by the Audit Committee,

Michael J. Rogers, Chairman

John R. O'Brien

Nora B. Sullivan

Lee C. Wortham

44


INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and to conduct the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2017.  Representatives of KPMG LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions that may be raised, and they will have the opportunity to make a statement, if they so desire. 

Fees Billed by KPMG LLP. The following table shows the fees that KPMG LLP billed the Company for audit and other services provided for fiscal years 2017 and 2016.  Audit fees consist of professional services rendered for the audit of the Company's annual consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, review of the Company's financial statements included in the Company's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and services that are normally provided by KPMG LLP in connection with statutory and regulatory filings, including SEC filings or engagements for fiscal years 2017 and 2016. Audit-related fees consist of work performed by KPMG in connection with the Company’s registered common stock offering in January 2017.



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2017

 

2016

Audit Fees

 

$

428,300 

 

$

411,500 

Audit-Related Fees

 

 

150,000 

 

 

-    

Tax Fees

 

 

-    

 

 

-    

All Other Fees

 

 

-    

 

 

-    

Total

 

$

578,300 

 

$

411,500 

All fees listed in the table above were pre-approved by the Company's Audit Committee under the pre-approval policy described below.

The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services, if any, is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant's independence and has concluded that such services did not impair KPMG LLP's independence.

The Audit Committee's pre-approval policy details the types of audit, audit-related, tax and other services that have the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee, and the cost limits for those services.  Unless a type of service to be provided by the independent auditors has received general pre-approval, it requires specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.  Also, any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost levels require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.

45


PROPOSAL II – ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION PAID TO THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

General

In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company is requesting shareholder approval of a non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation paid to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table included in this proxy statement (the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”)Proxy Statement) was $1,041,488.

Based on this information, for 2023 the CEO’s annual total compensation was 16 times that of the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees.

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as disclosed pursuant to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and our CEO, we took the following steps:

1.To identify the “median employee” (ME) from our employee population, we analyzed the entire employee population other than the CEO. We determined that, as of December 31, 2023, our employee population consisted of 433 individuals, with all of these individuals located in the United States.

2.All full time, part time, seasonal and temporary workers who worked at least seven days in 2023 and who started on or before December 1, 2023 were included. The employee population we analyzed included all employees of the Company and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. We analyzed the amount of salary and wages of our employees as reflected in our payroll records as reported to the Internal Revenue Service on Form W-2 for 2023. In making this determination, we annualized the compensation of full-time, part-time, seasonal and temporary employees who were hired in 2023 but did not work for us for the entire fiscal year.

3.We then calculated the ME’s total compensation for 2023. The ME’s 2023 total compensation included the same components as the 2023 total compensation for our CEO as reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table (SCT) included in this Proxy Statement, such as base salary, overtime, annual bonus, referral bonuses, stock award/options, 401(k) matching contributions, and any increase in value of defined benefit pension plans.

4.The annual total compensation of our CEO used for purposes of calculating the ratio was the amount reported in the “Total” column of the SCT.

5.The ratio of the CEO’s compensation to the median compensation of all employees other than the CEO was determined by comparing the CEO’s 2023 total compensation to the ME’s 2023 total compensation. 

62


Executive Compensation

Pay Versus Performance Table



 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

Year

Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO ($)(1)

Compensation Actually Paid to PEO ($)(2)

Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs ($)(3)

Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs ($)(3)

Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On Total Shareholder Return ($)(4)

Net Income ($)

2023

1,041,488 900,436 454,555 386,088 127 24,523,535 

2022

1,299,185 1,248,286 394,612 379,794 145 22,389,309 

2021

1,039,433 1,246,831 380,635 438,829 151 24,042,711 



 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The dollar amounts reported are the SEC’s executivetotal compensation disclosure rules, includingreported for our President and CEO, Mr. Nasca, in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”, compensation tables and narrative discussion provided in this proxy statement under the caption “Executive Compensation,” above.  At our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders expressed a preference that the advisory “say on pay” vote take place on the annual basis recommended by our Board of Directors. This preference was subsequently adopted by our Board of Directors, and so we are again providing our shareholders with a “say on pay” vote this year. The next advisory vote on the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers will take place at our Thirty-First Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2019. The next vote regarding the frequency of say on pay votes also will take place at our Thirty-First Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2019. 

The Board of Directors requests that shareholders approve the following advisory resolution:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.

The Company believes that its compensation policies and procedures are effective in achieving the Company’s goals of rewarding sustained financial and operating performance and leadership excellence, aligning the executives’ long-term interests with those of the Company’s shareholders, and motivating the executives to remain with the Company for long and productive careers.  These policies and procedures are described above under the section “Executive Compensation”.  The Human Resource and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, composed entirely of independent directors, in consultation with consultants from time to time, oversees the Company’s compensation programs and monitors policies to ensure that those policies are appropriate.

The Company urges shareholders to read the section entitled “Executive Compensation”, above, including the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”, the 2017 Summary Compensation Table for fiscal years 2023, 2022 and related tables,2021.  Mr. Nasca served as President and CEO for each of the narrative included within that section, which provide detailed informationyears presented.

(2)

SEC rules require certain adjustments be made to the Summary Compensation Table totals to determine “compensation actually paid” as reported in the Pay Versus Performance Table.  “Compensation actually paid” does not necessarily represent cash and/or equity value transferred to the applicable NEO without restriction, but rather is a value calculated under applicable SEC rules.  In general, “compensation actually paid” is calculated as Summary Compensation Table total compensation adjusted to include the fair market value of equity awards as of December 31 of the applicable year or, if earlier, the vesting date (rather than the grant date).  The following table details these adjustments:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PEO

2023

2022

2021

Summary Compensation Table Total

$                                     1,041,488 

$                              1,299,185 

$                   1,039,433 

Subtract Amounts Reported under the "Stock Awards" column in the Summary Compensation Table

(169,926)(164,992)(123,820)

Subtract Amounts Reported under the "Option Awards" column in the Summary Compensation Table

 -

 -

(41,262)

Add Fair Value of Awards Granted during year that Remain Unvested as of Year-End

150,966 158,384 127,751 

Add (Subtract) for Change in Fair Value from prior Year-End to current Year-End of Awards Granted Prior to Year that were Outstanding and Unvested as of Year-End.

(74,888)(23,840)195,901 

Add (Subtract) for Change in Fair Value from prior Year-End to current Year-end of Awards Granted Prior to Year that Vested during the Year.

(47,204)(20,451)48,828 

Compensation Actually Paid

$                                        900,436 

$                              1,248,286 

$                   1,246,831 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other NEO's

2023

2022

2021

Summary Compensation Table Total

$                                        454,555 

$                                 394,612 

$                      380,635 

Subtract Amounts Reported under the "Stock Awards" column in the Summary Compensation Table

(70,149)(53,187)(32,225)

Subtract Amounts Reported under the "Option Awards" column in the Summary Compensation Table

 -

 -

(10,725)

Add Fair Value of Awards Granted during year that Remain Unvested as of Year-End

29,591 51,056 33,248 

Add (Subtract) for Change in Fair Value from prior Year-End to current Year-End of Awards Granted Prior to Year that were Outstanding and Unvested as of Year-End.

(16,553)(6,795)55,643 

Add (Subtract) for Change in Fair Value from prior Year-End to current Year-End of Awards Granted Prior to Year that Vested during the Year.

(11,356)(5,892)12,253 

Compensation Actually Paid

$                                        386,088 

$                                 379,794 

$                      438,829 

(3)

The NEOs in the 2023 reporting year were Messrs. Connerton and Pawlak.  NEOs in the 2022 and 2021 reporting year were Messrs. Connerton and Aaron Whitehouse.

(4)

TSR is determined based on the Company’s compensation policies and practices and the compensationvalue of the Named Executive Officers. 

Non-Binding Resolution

This advisory resolution, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” resolution, is not binding on the Company, the Boardan initial fixed investment of Directors or the Human Resource and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, and may not be construed as overruling any decision made by the Board.  However, the Board and the Human Resource and Compensation Committee will take the voting results into account when evaluating the Company’s executive compensation program and considering future compensation arrangements.$100.

46

63

 


Executive Compensation

Relationship Between Pay and Performance

As described in more detail in pages 38 to 61 of this Proxy Statement regarding the Company’s executive compensation program, the Company’s executive compensation program includes variable components in the form of annual incentive cash compensation based upon the Company’s profitability.  Compensation decisions at the Company are made independently of SEC disclosure requirements. While the Company utilizes several performance measures to align executive compensation with the Company’s performance, all of those measures are not presented in the “Pay Versus Performance Table.” Moreover, the Company generally seeks to incentivize long-term performance and, therefore, does not specifically align the Company’s performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of SEC Regulation S-K) for a particular year.

A screenshot of a graph

Description automatically generated

Cap vs. Total Shareholder Return

CAP vs. Net Income



64


Transactions with Related Persons

The Company’s written policies and procedures with respect to transactions with related persons require the review and approval or ratification by the Audit Committee for any transaction in which the Company will be a participant and any related person has or will have a material interest (direct or indirect), other than transactions involving less than $5,000 when aggregated with all similar transactions. Related persons include the Company’s directors, director nominees and executive officers and their immediate family members, as well as persons owning more than 5% of the Company’s common stock and any immediate family member of such shareholder.

Under the Company’s Related Person Transaction Policy, a related person transaction may be consummated or continue if the Audit Committee has approved or ratified the transaction in accordance with the following guidelines: in considering whether to approve or ratify related person transactions, the Audit Committee will take into account, among other factors, (i) whether the related person transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party; (ii) whether the related person transaction has been reviewed and approved by the Company’s subsidiary banking institution in accordance with Federal Reserve Regulation O and the process and procedure established by such subsidiary banking institution to ensure compliance with Regulation O; (iii) whether the related person transaction is approved by the disinterested members of the Board of Directors; and (iv) whether the related person transaction involves compensation approved by the Company’s Human Resource and Compensation Committee.

The Audit Committee meets annually with management to discuss and review related person transactions for the current calendar year and the two previous calendar years, including the proposed aggregate value of such transactions. After review and discussion, the Audit Committee will determine, based on the above guidelines, whether to approve or ratify each related person transaction, and at each subsequently scheduled meeting, management will update the Audit Committee, as necessary, as to any material change to previously approved related person transactions and any proposed related person transactions.

The Bank has had, and in the future expects to have, banking and fiduciary transactions with directors and executive officers of the Company and some of their affiliates. All such transactions have been in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms (including interest rates and collateral on loans) as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated third parties, and do not involve more than a normal risk of collectivity or present other unfavorable features.

65


Audit Committee Report

The information contained in this Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” or incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with the Company’s management and Crowe LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2023 fiscal year. The Audit Committee has also discussed with Crowe LLP the matters required to be discussed under the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Crowe LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding Crowe LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Crowe LLP its independence from the Company.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its 2023 fiscal year for filing with the SEC.

Submitted by the Audit Committee,

Michael J. Rogers, Chairman

Dawn DePerrior

Robert A. James

Nora B. Sullivan

Lee C. Wortham

66


Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Crowe LLP served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and conducted the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2023. Representatives of Crowe LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions that may be raised, and they will have the opportunity to make a statement, if they so desire.

Fees Billed by Crowe LLP. The following table shows the fees that Crowe LLP billed the Company for audit and other services provided for fiscal years 2023 and 2022.  Audit fees consist of professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, review of the Company’s financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and services that are normally provided by independent auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings, including SEC filings or engagements for fiscal years 2023 and 2022.  



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

2023

 

  

2022

 

 

 

 

Audit Fees

  

$

486,000 

 

  

$

486,000 

 

 

 

 

Audit-Related Fees

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Fees

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

All Other Fees

  

 

$16,935 

 

  

 

$4,252 

 

 

 

 

Total

  

$

502,935 

 

  

$

490,252 

 

All fees listed in the table above were pre-approved by the Company’s Audit Committee under the pre-approval policy described below.

The Audit Committee’s pre-approval policy details the types of audit, audit-related, tax and other services that have the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee, and the cost limits for those services. Unless a type of service to be provided by the independent auditors has received general pre-approval, it requires specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Also, any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost levels require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.

67


Proposal II – Advisory Vote on the Compensation Paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers

General

In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company is requesting shareholder approval of a non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation paid to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table included in this proxy statement (the NEOs) as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s executive compensation disclosure rules, including the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”, compensation tables and narrative discussion provided in this proxy statement under the caption “Executive Compensation,” above. At our 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders expressed a preference that the advisory “Say on Pay” vote take place on the annual basis recommended by our Board of Directors. This preference was subsequently adopted by our Board of Directors, and so we are again providing our shareholders with a “Say-on-Pay” vote this year.

The Board of Directors requests that shareholders approve the following advisory resolution:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.

The Company believes that its compensation policies and procedures are effective in achieving the Company’s goals of rewarding sustained financial and operating performance and leadership excellence, aligning the executives’ long-term interests with those of the Company’s shareholders, and motivating the executives to remain with the Company for long and productive careers. These policies and procedures are described above under the section “Executive Compensation”. The Human Resource and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, composed entirely of independent directors, in consultation with consultants from time to time, oversees the Company’s compensation programs and monitors policies to ensure that those policies are appropriate.

The Company urges shareholders to read the section entitled “Executive Compensation”, above, including the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”, the 2023 Summary Compensation Table and related tables, and the narrative included within that section, which provide detailed information on the Company’s compensation policies and practices and the compensation of the Named Executive Officers.

Non-Binding Resolution

This advisory resolution, commonly referred to as a “Say-on-Pay” resolution, is not binding on the Company, the Board of Directors or the Human Resource and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, and may not be construed as overruling any decision made by the Board. However, the Board and the Human Resource and Compensation Committee will take the voting results into account when evaluating the Company’s executive compensation program and considering future compensation arrangements.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast is needed to approve the non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation paid to the NEOs. Under New York law, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

Unless otherwise directed, the persons named in the proxy card intend to vote shares as to which proxies are received FOR approval of the non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION PAID TO THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

47

 


                

PROPOSAL III – RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

68


Proposal III – Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm

The Company is asking shareholders to ratify the appointment of Crowe LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our current fiscal year. Our 2024 fiscal year began on January 1, 2024 and will end on December 31, 2024. Although ratification is not legally required, the Company is submitting the appointment of Crowe LLP to our shareholders for ratification in the interest of good corporate governance. In the event that this appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee of the Board will reconsider the appointment but may still engage Crowe LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee appoints the independent registered public accounting firm annually. Before appointing Crowe LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2024, the Audit Committee carefully considered the firm’s experience and qualifications.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast is needed to approve the ratification of the appointment of Crowe LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Under New York law, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

Unless authority to so vote is withheld, the persons named in the proxy card intend to vote shares as to which proxies are received FOR ratification of the appointment of Crowe LLP as to the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2024.  

                

The Company is asking shareholders to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for our current fiscal year.  Our 2018 fiscal year began on January 1, 2018 and will end on December 31, 2018.  Although ratification is not legally required, the Company is submitting the appointment of KPMG to our shareholders for ratification in the interest of good corporate governance.  In the event that this appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee of the Board will reconsider the appointment, but may still engage KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm.

 

The Audit Committee appoints the independent registered public accounting firm annually.  Before appointing KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2018, the Audit Committee carefully considered the firm’s qualifications and performance during fiscal 2017, as well as the fees paid to KPMG for such services.  In its review of non-audit service fees and its appointment of KPMG as Evans Bancorp, Inc.’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee considered whether the provision of such services was compatible with maintaining KPMG’s independence.

 

Representatives of KPMG will be present at the Annual Meeting.  They will be given an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

        

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast is needed to approve the ratification of the appointment of KPMG as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.  Under New York law, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

Unless authority to so vote is withheld, the persons named in the proxy card intend to vote shares as to which proxies are received FOR ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as to the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2018.

 

THE COMPANY’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMGCROWE LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL 2018.2024.

 

                

48


OTHER MATTERS

The cost of solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company.  Solicitation other than by mail may be made by directors, officers or by regular employees of the Company, who will receive no additional compensation therefore, by personal or telephone solicitation, the cost of which is expected to be nominal.

The Board of Directors knows of no other matters to be presented for shareholder action at the Annual Meeting, other than the election of directors, the advisory vote on the compensation paid to our NEOs, and the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s registered public accounting firm.  However, if other matters do properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof, the Board of Directors intends that the persons named in the proxies will vote upon such matters in accordance with their best judgment.

49


SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2018

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Requirements for Shareholder Proposals to be Considered for Inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Materials.Shareholders of the Company may submit proposals on matters appropriate for shareholder action at meetings of shareholders in accordance with Rule 14a-8(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act.  For such proposals to be included in the Company’s proxy materials relating to its 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, all applicable requirements of Rule 14a-8 must be satisfied and such proposals must be received by the Company no later than November 22, 2018.  Such proposals should be delivered to the Secretary, Evans Bancorp, Inc., One Grimsby Drive, Hamburg, New York 14075.

Requirements for Shareholder Proposals to be Brought Before the Annual Meeting.  Except in the case of proposals made in accordance with Rule 14a-8(e) and for shareholder nominations to the Board of Directors which are governed by the procedures for director nominations by shareholders contained in the Company’s bylaws, described above under “Board of Director Committees – Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee,” for proposals to be considered at an Annual Meeting, the shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of the Company not less than 45 days prior to the anniversary of the date on which the Company first sent its proxy materials for its immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders. To be timely for the 2019 Annual Meeting, a shareholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received by the Secretary of the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company by February 5, 2019.  A shareholder’s notice to the Secretary must set forth, as to each matter the shareholder proposes to bring before the Annual Meeting, a detailed description of the matter to be acted upon.  This requirement is in addition to, and separate from, the requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a proposal included in the proxy statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting under Rule 14a-8(e).  A proxy granted by a shareholder will give discretionary authority to the proxies to vote on any matters not received by the Company on a timely basis as set forth above, subject to applicable rules of the SEC.

A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (without exhibits) is being distributed with this Proxy Statement.  The Annual Report on Form 10-K is also available, without charge, by writing or telephoning Michelle Baumgarden, Evans Bancorp, Inc., One Grimsby Drive, Hamburg, NY 14075, (716) 926-2000.  In addition, the Annual Report on Form 10-K (with exhibits) is available at the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov)and the Company’s website (www.evansbancorp.com).

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Picture 11

EVANS BANCORP, INC.

Robert G. Miller, Jr.

Secretary

Hamburg, New York

March 22,  2018

50


This page intentionally left blank


Picture 1

Picture 8


Picture 9

Other Matters

The cost of solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company. Solicitation other than by mail may be made by directors, officers or by regular employees of the Company, who will receive no additional compensation therefore, by personal or telephone solicitation, the cost of which is expected to be nominal.

The Board of Directors knows of no other matters to be presented for shareholder action at the Annual Meeting, other than the election of directors, the advisory vote on the compensation paid to our NEOs, and the ratification of the appointment of Crowe LLP as the Company’s registered public accounting firm. However, if other matters do properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof, the Board of Directors intends that the persons named in the proxies will vote upon such matters in accordance with their best judgment. A proxy granted by a shareholder will give the Board of Directors discretionary authority to vote on any matters of which the Company was not notified at least 45 days before the date on which the Company mailed its proxy materials for the prior year’s Annual Meeting.

69

 


Shareholder Proposals for 2025 

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Requirements for Shareholder Proposals to be Considered for Inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Materials.Shareholders of the Company may submit proposals on matters appropriate for shareholder action at meetings of shareholders in accordance with Rule 14a-8(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. For such proposals to be included in the Company’s proxy materials relating to its 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, all applicable requirements of Rule 14a-8 must be satisfied and such proposals must be received by the Company no later than November 25, 2024. Such proposals should be delivered to the Secretary, Evans Bancorp, Inc., 6460 Main Street, Williamsville, New York 14221.

Requirements for Shareholder Nominations to be Brought Before the Annual Meeting. Shareholder nominations to the Board of Directors are governed by the procedures for director nominations by shareholders contained in the Company’s bylaws, as described under “Board of Director Committees – Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.” Nominations made pursuant to the bylaws must be received by the Company no earlier than January 6, 2025 and no later than February 6, 2025.   Nominations should be delivered to the Secretary, Evans Bancorp, Inc., 6460 Main Street, Williamsville, New York 14221. This requirement is in addition to, and separate from, the requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a proposal included in the proxy statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting under Rule 14a-8(e).

Notice of Solicitation of Proxies. In accordance with Rule 14a-19 promulgated under the Exchange Act, a shareholder intending to engage in a director election contest with respect to the Company’s 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must give the Company notice of its intent to solicit proxies by providing the names of its nominees and certain other information at least 60 calendar days before the anniversary of the previous year’s annual meeting.  This deadline is March 8, 2025.

A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 (without exhibits) is available free of charge at www.edocumentview.com/EVBN, at the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov) and at the Company’s website (https://evansbancorp.q4ir.com). The Annual Report on Form 10-K is also available, without charge, by writing or telephoning Michelle Baumgarden, Evans Bancorp, Inc., 6460 Main Street, Williamsville, NY 14221, (716) 926-2000.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Picture 36

EVANS BANCORP, INC.

Michelle A. Baumgarden

Secretary

Williamsville, New York

March 25, 2024 

70


A black text on a white background

Description automatically generated

Annual Meeting Proxy Card

A close-up of a card

Description automatically generated

71


A close up of a document

Description automatically generated

Annual

The 2022 Annual Meeting of

The 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Evans Bancorp Inc. will be held on Tuesday, May 7th. 2024 at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time, virtually via the internet at meetnow.global/mfsswy9. Shareholders who hold their shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker must register in advance to attend the annual meeting. To register shareholders must submit proof of your proxy power (legal proxy) reflecting their Evans Bancorp, Inc holdings along with their name and email address to our transfer agent, Computershare, at legalproxy@computershare.com Requests for registration must be labeled as “legal proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m, Eastern time on April 22, 2024. Important notice regarding the internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The material is available at: www.envisionreports.com/EVBN